Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:e2da0e2a-b126-4227-8655-53c45228a785" >
Comparison of Long-...
Comparison of Long-term Performance of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Sweden from 2003 to 2018
-
- Persson, Michael (författare)
- Karolinska Institutet,Karolinska Institute,Karolinska University Hospital
-
- Glaser, Natalie (författare)
- Karolinska Institutet,Karolinska Institute,Stockholm South General Hospital
-
- Nilsson, Johan (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Thoraxkirurgi,Sektion II,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Artificiell intelligens och bioinformatik inom thoraxkirurgisk vetenskap,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Thoracic Surgery,Section II,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Artificial Intelligence and Bioinformatics in Cardiothoracic Sciences (AIBCTS),Lund University Research Groups,Skåne University Hospital
-
visa fler...
-
- Friberg, Örjan (författare)
- Örebro University Hospital
-
- Franco-Cereceda, Anders (författare)
- Karolinska Institutet,Karolinska Institute,Karolinska University Hospital
-
- Sartipy, Ulrik (författare)
- Karolinska Institutet,Karolinska Institute,Karolinska University Hospital
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2022-03-07
- 2022
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: JAMA Network Open. - : American Medical Association (AMA). - 2574-3805. ; 5:3
- Relaterad länk:
-
http://dx.doi.org/10... (free)
-
visa fler...
-
https://jamanetwork....
-
https://lup.lub.lu.s...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
http://kipublication...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Importance: The performance of bioprosthetic aortic valves is usually assessed in single valve models or head-to-head comparisons. National databases or registries offer the opportunity to investigate all available valve models in the population and allows for a comparative assessment of their performance. Objective: To analyze the long-term rates of reintervention, all-cause mortality, and heart failure hospitalization associated with commonly used bioprosthetic aortic valves and to identify valve model groups with deviation in clinical performance. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, nationwide cohort study included all adult patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery or ascending aortic surgery) in Sweden between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2018. Patients were identified from the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) registry. Patients with concomitant valve surgery, previous cardiac surgery, and previous transcatheter valve replacement were excluded. Follow-up was complete for all participants. Data were analyzed from March 9, 2020, to October 12, 2021. Exposures: Primary surgical aortic valve replacement with the Perimount, Mosaic/Hancock, Biocor/Epic, Mitroflow/Crown, Soprano, and Trifecta valve models. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of reintervention, defined as a subsequent aortic valve operation or transcatheter valve replacement. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Regression standardization and flexible parametric survival models were used to account for intergroup differences. Mean follow-up time was 7.1 years, and maximum follow-up time was 16.0 years. Results: A total of 16983 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.6 [8.5] years; 10 685 men [62.9%]) were included in the analysis. The Perimount valve model group had the lowest and the Mitroflow/Crown valve model group had the highest cumulative incidence of reintervention. The estimated cumulative incidence of reintervention at 10 years was 3.6% (95% CI, 3.1%-4.2%) in the Perimount valve model group and 12.2% (95% CI, 9.8%-15.1%) in the Mitroflow/Crown valve model group. The estimated incidence of reintervention at 10 years was 9.3% (95% CI, 7.3%-11.3%) in the Soprano valve model group. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study showed that the Perimount valve was the most commonly used and had the lowest incidence of reintervention, all-cause mortality, and heart failure hospitalization, whereas the Mitroflow/Crown valve had the highest rates. These findings highlight the need for clinical vigilance in patients who receive either a Soprano or Mitroflow/Crown aortic bioprosthesis..
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Kardiologi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems (hsv//eng)
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- art (ämneskategori)
- ref (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas