SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:ebac97b3-483d-40c0-b3ff-eeee4d306993"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:ebac97b3-483d-40c0-b3ff-eeee4d306993" > Are financial incen...

Are financial incentives more effective than health campaigns to quit smoking? A community-randomised smoking cessation trial in Denmark

Pisinger, Charlotta (författare)
Frederiksberg Hospital,University of Copenhagen
Toxværd, Cecilie Goltermann (författare)
Frederiksberg Hospital
Rasmussen, Mette (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Kliniskt Centrum för Hälsofrämjande Vård,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Clinical Health Promotion Centre,Lund University Research Groups,Frederiksberg Hospital
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2022
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: Preventive Medicine. - : Elsevier BV. - 0091-7435. ; 154
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • The aim of this community-randomised smoking cessation (SC) trial was to investigate both recruitment and SC-rates in three municipalities offering financial incentives (FIM) to smokers who stop smoking when attending a municipal SC-program and compare these with three municipalities investing in a campaign (CAM) that should encourage smokers to use the SC-program. Furthermore, in a non-randomised matched control design we investigated whether there was a difference in recruitment and SC-rates in the three FIM and the three CAM, comparing each with three matched control municipalities (MCM). Each municipality received approx. $16,000. The FIM rewarded persons who were abstinent when attending the municipal SC-program. The CAM spent the money on a campaign recruiting smokers to the SC-program. Two of three FIM were only partly active in recruiting smokers in the intervention year 2018. An intention-to-treat (ITT) approach was used in analyses. Complete case analyses and multiple imputation were used to address loss to follow-up. No difference in recruitment was found between the CAM and the FIM (p = 0.954), in adjusted analyses. In ITT analyses, FIM achieved significantly higher odds of validated abstinence from smoking at one-year follow-up (OR (95%CI): 1.63(1.1–2.4)), but not of self-reported continuous abstinence after six months than CAM. Compared with no intervention, campaigns increased the recruitment of smokers to the SC-program while financial incentives increased six months abstinence rates. In a randomised trial, no difference was demonstrated in the effect of financial incentives and campaigns to recruit smokers to a SC-program and financial incentives seemed superior to help smokers staying smoke-free for a year. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov ID: NCT03849092.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Campaigns
Community trial
Financial incentives
Randomised trial
Smoking cessation

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Pisinger, Charlo ...
Toxværd, Cecilie ...
Rasmussen, Mette
Om ämnet
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
och Hälsovetenskap
och Folkhälsovetensk ...
Artiklar i publikationen
Preventive Medic ...
Av lärosätet
Lunds universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy