SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:16bef072-0c89-484b-ae6e-5bbcc4c68b61"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:16bef072-0c89-484b-ae6e-5bbcc4c68b61" > A comparative life ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

A comparative life cycle assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas and three other fossil fuels

Bengtsson, Selma, 1984 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Andersson, Karin, 1952 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Fridell, Erik, 1963 (author)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
 (creator_code:org_t)
2011-05-13
2011
English.
In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. - : SAGE Publications. - 2041-3084 .- 1475-0902. ; 225:2, s. 97-110
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Air emissions from shipping have received attention in recent years and the shippingindustry is striving for solutions to reduce their emissions and to comply with stricter regulations.Strategies to reduce emissions can consist of a fuel switch, engine changes, or end-ofpipetechnologies, but they do not necessarily imply reduced life cycle emissions. The presentpaper assesses the environmental performance of marine fuels from well-to-propeller using lifecycle assessment (LCA). Four fossil fuels are compared: heavy fuel oil (HFO), marine gas oil,gas-to-liquid (GTL) fuel, and liquefied natural gas (LNG), combined with two exhaust abatementtechniques: open-loop scrubber and selective catalytic reduction. LNG and other alternativesthat comply with the SECA 2015 and Tier III NOx requirements give decreased acidification andeutrophication potentials with 78–90 per cent in a life cycle perspective compared with HFO. Incontrast, the use of LNG does not decrease the global warming potential by more than 8–20 percent, the amount depending mainly on the magnitude of the methane slip from the gas engine.None of the fossil fuels scrutinized here would decrease the greenhouse gas emissions significantlyfrom a life cycle perspective. The study supports the need for LCA when evaluating theenvironmental impact of a fuel change, e.g. it is found that the highest global warming potentialduring the whole life cycle is connected to the alternatives with GTL fuel.

Subject headings

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Naturresursteknik -- Annan naturresursteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Environmental Engineering -- Other Environmental Engineering (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap -- Miljövetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences -- Environmental Sciences (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Marine fuels
liquefied natural gas
marine gas oil
gas-to-liquid
heavy fuel oil

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view