SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:509e41d7-4a56-42e0-9ef6-4f223cbc3ccf"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:509e41d7-4a56-42e0-9ef6-4f223cbc3ccf" > Climate metrics and...

Climate metrics and the carbon footprint of livestock products: where's the beef?

Persson, Martin, 1976 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Johansson, Daniel, 1975 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Cederberg, Christel, 1959 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
visa fler...
Hedenus, Fredrik, 1976 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Bryngelsson, David, 1981 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2015-03-02
2015
Engelska.
Ingår i: Environmental Research Letters. - : IOP Publishing. - 1748-9318 .- 1748-9326. ; 10:3
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • The livestock sector is estimated to account for 15% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, 80% of which originate from ruminant animal systems due to high emissions of methane (CH4) from enteric fermentation and manure management. However, recent analyses have argued that the carbon footprint (CF) of ruminant meat and dairy products are substantially reduced if one adopts alternative metrics for comparing emissions of GHGs-e.g., the 100 year global temperature change potential (GTP(100)), instead of the commonly used 100 year global warming potential (GWP(100))-due to a lower valuation of CH4 emissions. This raises the question of which metric to use. Ideally, the choice of metric should be related to a climate policy goal. Here, we argue that basing current GHG metrics solely on temperature impact 100 years into the future is inconsistent with the current global climate goal of limiting warming to 2 degrees C, a limit that is likely to be reached well within 100 years. A reasonable GTP value for CH4, accounting for current projections for when 2 degrees C warming will be reached, is about 18, leading to a current CF of 19 kg CO2-eq. per kilo beef (carcass weight, average European system), 20% lower than if evaluated using GWP(100). Further, we show that an application of the GTP metric consistent with a 2 degrees C climate limit leads to the valuation of CH4 increasing rapidly over time as the temperature ceiling is approached. This means that the CF for beef would rise by around 2.5% per year in the coming decades, surpassing the GWP based footprint in only ten years. Consequently, the impact on the livestock sector of substituting GTPs for GWPs would be modest in the near term, but could potentially be very large in the future due to a much higher (>50%) and rapidly appreciating CF.

Ämnesord

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap -- Miljövetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences -- Environmental Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

carbon footprint
global temperature change potential (GTP)
global warming potential (GWP)
livestock
agriculture
greenhouse gas metrics

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy