SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:a8964254-4f63-496e-986b-9499371426db"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:a8964254-4f63-496e-986b-9499371426db" > Comparative thermod...

Comparative thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification-based light olefin production using methanol or DME as the platform chemical

Arvidsson, Maria, 1984 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Haro, Pedro (författare)
Universidad de Sevilla,University of Seville
Morandin, Matteo, 1981 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
visa fler...
Harvey, Simon, 1965 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2016
2016
Engelska.
Ingår i: Chemical Engineering Research and Design. - : Elsevier BV. - 0263-8762 .- 1744-3563. ; 115, s. 182-194
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • This work investigates and compares the thermodynamic performance of alternative platform chemicals for the production of light olefins (i.e., ethylene, propylene, and mixed butylenes) via gasification of lignocellulosic biomass (forest residues). Two concepts based on the same general process layout are considered: (i) via methanol synthesis and methanol-to-olefins (MTO) synthesis; (ii) via direct dimethyl ether (DME) synthesis and DME-to-olefins (DTO) synthesis. The work is based on process models established in Aspen Plus to obtain mass and energy balances. Heat recovery targets for integration of a steam network for combined heat and power production are investigated using pinch analysis tools. The different process alternatives are compared in terms of energy efficiency. Additionally, to identify key process differences, the cold gas efficiency and carbon conversion from biomass feedstock to various intermediate products along the process value chain are compared. The results show that light olefins could be produced with an energy efficiency of approximately 52–54% (higher heating value (HHV) basis) using methanol and DME as platform chemicals. The two investigated concepts had similar cold gas efficiency along the process value chain and overall electricity balance. Accordingly, no significant thermodynamic difference could be identified for the two investigated cases. One interesting feature that is identified is that the same amount of the renewable carbon in the feedstock is lost, mainly as CO2, regardless of whether the methanol or DME route is adopted. The difference is where in the process value chain most of the CO2 is formed and removed.

Ämnesord

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Kemiteknik -- Kemiska processer (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Chemical Engineering -- Chemical Process Engineering (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Platform chemical
Biorefinery
Light olefins
Gasification
DME
Methanol

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy