SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:e2229446-af79-4e83-861d-054b6d10a2d3"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:e2229446-af79-4e83-861d-054b6d10a2d3" > Outcomes-focused ev...

Outcomes-focused evaluation of engineering programs - Inhibitor or stimulant for improvement?

Arehag, Marie, 1952 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Bertilsson, Josefin (författare)
Ekvall, Åsa (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
visa fler...
Hansson, Erika (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Malmqvist, Johan, 1964 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Peterson, Lena, 1961 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Rilby, Ulla (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2013
2013
Engelska.
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, USA.
  • Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • In Sweden, a new model for quality evaluation of higher education is being introduced. It is internationally unique. A very strong emphasis on assessing the quality of an entire education through its outcomes, defined by samples of final degree reports, is perhaps the most original feature of the model. This is claimed to enable a direct assessment of quality rather than the indirect assessment used in conventional models. The model has, however, been intensively debated during its development and first years of use. The aims of this paper are first to evaluate in what ways and to what extent the Swedish national model for evaluation of higher education contributes to the quality improvement of the evaluated programs, and second to describe and evaluate an approach for organizing the project to prepare the evaluation documentation for a large-scale education evaluation. The paper concludes that on an overall and averaged level, the project participants estimated that the model will contribute to positive effects. Specific areas are identified including ethics and focus of final degree reports. However, there is a strong variance in the data: There is a substantial fraction of participants who have not identified any improvements or weak spots, and who do not think that the evaluation preparation will positively affect education quality development. Chalmers University of Technology chose to approach the evaluation with a centrally managed project. The setup gave possibilities for rationalization through common training, supporting materials, a common document database and for information sharing across departmental boundaries. Nevertheless, the project was very time-consuming with an average of 540 hours spent for each program/degree.

Ämnesord

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Annan teknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Other Engineering and Technologies (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Program evaluation
Accreditation
Education quality assurance
Sweden

Publikations- och innehållstyp

kon (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy