| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Borsgård, Gustav, 1984-
(författare)
-
Svenskämnet och demokratiuppdraget : Lärares syn på litteraturundervisning som demokratiarbete
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Utbildning och Demokrati. - : Örebro universitet. - 1102-6472 .- 2001-7316. ; 29:1, s. 65-84
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article focuses on the possibility of integrating citizenship education in Swedish language coursesafter the reform of Swedish upper secondary school in 2011. The studyis based on qualitative interviews with eight Swedish language teachers.All subjects answered questions about their views on literature educationin connection to citizenship education. The study shows that teachers canuse their interpretation of the written curriculum as a way of appropriating, refusing or negotiating with the governing policies. In several cases,teachers choose to downplay the relevance of the written curriculumand base their pedagogical choices on their own experience as teachersinstead. The study also examines the teachers’ views on democracy andentrepreneurship in education, and shows how tests and administrativeduties can influence the teachers’ pedagogical choices.
|
|
| 3. |
- Borsgård, Gustav, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Från litteraturförståelse till literacy : Om utbredningen av ett begrepp och konsekvenserna för litteraturdidaktiken
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap. - Lund : Föreningen för utgivande av Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap. - 1104-0556 .- 2001-094X. ; :4, s. 69-78
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- During the last few decades, the concept of ”literacy” has had a growing impact on the vast fields of education. Although the uses of the concept are multifaceted and diverse, the hegemonic policy discourse as supported by the OECD treats literacy as an individual competence closely tied to the development of explicit reading strategies. This article examines what the concept of literacy means for literary studies in general and literature education in particular. We argue that there are reasons to critically reflect upon the effects of invoking the concept of literacy in the field of literature education. With the aid of theorists like Rita Felski and Toril Moi, our main focus is to examine the risks of centering attention on the ”subject” (the student and his/her abilities) instead of the ”object” (in our case, the works of fiction). By turning to Gert Biesta and Emmanuel Lévinas, we argue that there is an educational value in acknowledging and appreciating what lies beyond the scope of the student’s immediate understanding.
|
|
