| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Cutas, Daniela
(författare)
-
Ai cui sunt embrionii?
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Think Outside the Box.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Florea, Ioana, 1981
(författare)
-
Gazeta de Arta Politica : Political Art Gazette
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Gazeta de Arta Politica. - 2559-6446. ; 5:18, 19
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Gazeta de Artă Politică discusses, analyzes and promotes the social and political dimension of the most diverse forms of cultural and artistic projects. G.A.P. aims at: • disclosing the political dimension of artistic objects, including those that do not explicitly assume it; • analyzing the potential impact of major cultural programs and public policies in the cultural sphere; • promoting artistic projects with emancipatory goals and contributing to the consolidation of an Eastern-European left-wing-oriented arts network; • elaborating a revolutionary artistic discourse and practice, from a local perspective.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Bagiu, Lucian
(författare)
-
"Celelalte lumi" ale lui Eugen Curta sau labirintul metalepselor narative
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Philologica. - 1582-5523. ; 16:1, s. 319-327
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The author proves a very good knowledge of the most subtle and diverse narrative methods up to the point of suspecting him of affectedness in writing: he seems to enjoy drawing up the most fanciful frameworks of a novel’s design. Each new fragment is being narrated from a certain character’s point of view, the abundant prospects achieving the equivocation of the whole story up to the absurd. Some of the initial doubtless information will come to be uncertain. The author’s voice is hanging over, self-centred, narcissist; a character itself insinuating to indulge in the part of puppeteer of all. The narrator recounts – to us or to him, an unsolved issue – using first person, as if in a liberating confession, seemingly banal deeds of his rather dull and washed-out existence. Reading through the lines we distinguish however the condition of the author expounding his project to write the novel in the making. The author narrator devises compensatory the other worlds of his novel. They are fictitious worlds where he can unburden and where he can ultimately evade to, in order to live thoroughly, untroubled the illusions, the Utopias, the small or big conceitedness or vanities. The narrator proposes, for himself the bookish perception of existence, living the reality according to certain unreal, fictitious experiences.
|
|
| 9. |
- Bagiu, Lucian
(författare)
-
Despre Sebastian, Sorescu, Dosoftei, Derrida și limba română
- 2016
-
Bok (refereegranskat)abstract
- The book is a collection of the articles the author has published between 2003-2015, in Romanian or English, in various academic journals. Some of them are concerned with the dramaturgy of Mihail Sebastian (Jocul de-a vacanța), of Marin Sorescu (Paracliserul), the translations and versifing of the Psalms by Dosoftei, Derrida's deconstruction philosophy as opposed to Saussure's structuralism, teaching of Romanian language to foreign students in various universities (NTNU, Charles University in Prague, 1 Decembrie 1918 University in Alba Iulia, Lund University), three interviews with the author in Romanian media (2009, 2013, 2016) etc.
|
|
| 10. |
- Bagiu, Lucian, et al.
(författare)
-
Diferite "voci" în "Meșterul Manole" de Lucian Blaga
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Discourse as a Form of Multiculturalism in Literature and Communication : Literature - Literature. - 9786068624211 ; , s. 1651-1658
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- There are several characters with a brief appearance in the history of the drama, thus having an apparent minor significance in designing the play. They seem to be mere “working tools” for the playwright. However when relating them to the major issues of the literary product and if integrating them in a larger vision of the whole creation of the author their significance and role can be outlined in a more adequate manner. The Herald may stand for the impossibility of the common man to understand the drama of the artist, for the incapacity of a mediocre person to assimilate the aspirations of the genius. The Second Carter is a good opportunity to express the middle-ages relations between the Orthodoxy of the Romanians and the Lutheranism of the Saxons in Transylvania, the Protestantism and the whole religious Reform having been rejected naturally by the Romanian people. The Third Carter is the pretext to express in an artistic manner a historical reality, i.e. the major role Târgovişte played as a spiritual focal point for the Romanian middle-ages Orthodoxy, but also as a centre for the religious printings in Romanian or Slavonic languages. Also one can distinguish the suggestion of a light irony on the behalf of the author with regards to the human prosaic hypostasis of the Romanian Orthodox priests when associating their two fundamental habits, anointing the priests and taking care of their own housekeeping. The Voivode is an image of a person with a subtle, diplomatic intelligence that leaves room for a waggish wit. He is fully aware of his condition as patron of church building. He hesitates between two decisions he should make concerning Manole the Craftsman: either to highly praise the artist, the creator or to sentence to death the human murderer. Whichever decision he would make, he knows very well his prerogative as a ruler is absolute and supreme, the middle-ages autocracy allowing him anything. Having a refined spirit, the Voivode understands from the very beginning both the superlative features of the creation and the sacrifice of the creator. His attitude seems to be benevolent, conciliatory, as he is very satisfied with the “gift” of the Masons – in his view the church belongs both to the ruler and to God. It becomes obvious the Voivode urges Manole to enjoy the “fruit of his endeavor and of his hands”. He forgives Manole, having been convinced that at the Last Judgment the church Manole has built would exculpate him of all sins. After Manole commits suicide the Voivode pays him the proper respect. The whole portrait configures the Voivode as an exceptional ambassador of his people, at a far distance from the bloody figure portrayed in some variants of the folk ballad, closer to the real historical character, the benefactor of the Argeş Monastery, Neagoe.
|
|
