| 1. |
- Anop, Sviatlana, 1974-
(författare)
-
Анализ хозяйственной деятельности: Учеб.-метод. комплекс для студ. спец. 25 01 07, 25 01 04 Полоцкий Государственный Университет, Новополоцк, Республика Беларусь /Analysis of the economic activity: Study manual for students with specialization 25 01 07, 25 01 04. 2nd ed. Polotsk State University, Novopolotsk, Belarus
- 2005
-
Annan publikation (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Приведены темы изучаемого курса, изложены теоретические и практические основы анализа хозяйственной деятельности промышленных предприятий и в основных отраслях экономики. Представлены задания для практических занятий, рекомендации по организации рейтингового контроля изучения дисциплины, вопросы к экзамену, тест для проведения зачета, контрольные работы по курсу, тематика курсовых работ.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Arzyutov, Dmitry V.
(författare)
-
Antropolog ili politik? Politicheskie pristrastii͡a i teoreticheskie postroenii͡a Sergei͡a Shirokogorova [Anthropologist or Politician? Political Bias and Theoretical Constructions of Sergei M. Shirokogoroff]
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Etnographicheskoe Obozrenie. - : Russian Academy of Sciences. - 0869-5415. ; :5, s. 121-142
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article deals with the archival collection of photographs and drawings of Sergei and Elizabeth Shirokogoroff from the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography. I examine these images as a visual technique of theoretical thinking in anthropology. In the first part of the article, I reconstruct the fieldwork of the Shirokogoroffs and focus on the technical history of fieldworking and the analysis of the images. Two main case studies are in the centre of the article: the analysis of the background and foreground of the photographs and “composite portraits” as a special genre in the history of physical anthropology. In the final part of the article, I provide an analysis of diagrams and drawings that Shirokogoroff did as an illustration of his theoretical ideas. The article concludes with an analysis of social life of their images in writings and archives of their colleagues.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Arzyutov, Dmitry V., et al.
(författare)
-
Whole Parts: Transnational Life Histories of the Archives of Sergei and Elizabeth Shirokogoroff
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Antropologicheskij forum. - : Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography of the Russian Academy of Sciences (The Kunstkamera). - 1815-8870. ; 17:51, s. 175-198
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- What does an anthropologist’s archive look like? Where is it located? And is the anthropology of archives important for the understanding of anthropological thinking today? Here we answer these questions by analysing the various life histories of the archival fragments of one of the most puzzling and influential anthropologists in the history of Russian and Soviet anthropology: Sergei Mikhailovich Shirokogoroff (1887–1939). Shirokogoroff is credited as being one of the authors of the etnos theory — one of the main instruments of identity politics in Russia, China, Germany and also, in part, Japan and South Africa. The transnational life histories of Shirokogoroff and his wife Elizaveta [Elizabeth] Nikolaevna (1884–1943), and of their ideas, suggests a conception of the archive not as a single whole, but instead as a collection of forgotten, hidden, obliterated, or, on the other hand, scrupulously preserved fragments. These fragments are not centred in one place or organized around any one reading, but they nevertheless represent “partial connections”. Moreover, as we can see today with hindsight, none of these archival fragments lay inert. They have been intertwined in local political and social ontologies. Our text has an autoethnograpic quality. While illustrating separate episodes from the life of the Shirokogoroffs we also will tell of our search for the manuscripts through which we were forced onto strange paths and encounters. These greatly deepened our understanding both of the life of documents and their material links to the lives of researchers. Our article is an attempt to illustrate this complex picture which, in the end, will allow us to conclude that we have only just begun to understand the workings of the anthropologist’s archive in the history of anthropological thought.
|
|
