SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "LAR1:lu ;lar1:(lnu);srt2:(2007);pers:(Paradis Carita)"

Search: LAR1:lu > Linnaeus University > (2007) > Paradis Carita

  • Result 1-2 of 2
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Jones, Steven, et al. (author)
  • Googling for opposites: a web-based study of antonym canonicity
  • 2007
  • In: Corpora. - 1755-1676. ; 2:2, s. 129-154
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • This paper seeks to explain why some semantically-opposed word pairs are more likely to be seen as canonical antonyms (for example, cold/hot) than others (icy/scorching, cold/fiery, freezing/hot, etc.). Specifically, it builds on research which has demonstrated that, in discourse, antonyms are inclined to favour certain frames, such as ‘X and Y alike’, ‘from X to Y’ and ‘either X or Y’ (Justeson and Katz, 1991; etc.), and to serve a limited range of discourse functions (Jones, 2002). Our premise is that the more canonical an antonym pair is, the greater the fidelity with which it will occupy such frames. Since an extremely large corpus is needed to identify meaningful patterns of co-occurrence, we turn to Internet data for this research. As well as enabling the notion of antonym canonicity to be revisited from a more empirical perspective, this approach also allows us to evaluate the appropriateness (and assess the risks) of using the World Wide Web as a corpus for studies into certain types of low-frequency textual phenomena.
  •  
2.
  • Paradis, Carita, et al. (author)
  • Antonyms in dictionary entries: Methodological aspects
  • 2007
  • In: Studia Linguistica. - : Wiley. - 1467-9582 .- 0039-3193. ; 61:3, s. 261-277
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • This paper takes the treatment of antonymy in Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's English Dictionary (2003) as the point of departure for a discussion about the principles of antonym inclusion in dictionaries and corpus methodologies in lexicology. CCALED includes canonical antonyms such as good/ bad and dead/alive, as well as more contextually restricted pairings such as hot/ mild and flat/fizzy. The vast majority of the antonymic pairings in the dictionary are adjectives. Most of the antonyms are morphologically different from the headwords they define and typically do not involve antonymic affixes such as non-, un- or -less. Only just over one-third of the total number of pairs is given in both directions. The principles for when antonyms are included in CCALED are not transparent. We propose an initial top-down corpus-driven method to support decisions about antonym selection and inclusion.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-2 of 2
Type of publication
journal article (2)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (2)
Author/Editor
Paradis, Carita (2)Undo refine
Willners, Caroline (2)
Jones, Steven (1)
Murphy, M. Lynne (1)
University
Lund University (2)
Linnaeus University  (2)Undo refine
Language
English (2)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Humanities (2)
Year
2007 (2)Undo refine

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view