1. |
|
|
2. |
- Mulder, Johann, et al.
(author)
-
Ingående av offentlig anställning
- 2009
-
In: Arbeid og rett. Festskrift til Henning Jakhellns 70-årsdag. - Oslo : Cappelen akademisk. - 9788202302351 ; , s. 467-476, s. 467-476
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
- Lenninger, Sara M.
(author)
-
Narratives and the semiotic freedom of children
- 2021
-
In: Sign System Studies. - 1406-4243. ; 49:1-2, s. 216-234
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Both adults’ habits-of-thought and their understanding of children’s stories shape how adults interpret children’s participation in conversations. In the light of the requests on children’s rights that follow from the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) this paper stresses the relevance of authorities having semiotically informed knowledge on children’s meaning-making within conversations with adults. In Article 12, the CRC stipulates the right of children to participate in and to be heard about decisions that affect their everyday lives. According to the same Article, however, these rights can be restrained, based on the authority’s judgements of the child’s age and maturity. Sociological studies have highlighted the importance of adopting the child’s perspective in judging matters that concern her. The present paper further suggests that narrow conceptualization of the sign can help one to observe different levels of meaning in adults’ and children’s conversations better. Although Paul Ricoeur did not investigate children’s narratives per se, his theory of narratives and narrativity offers a phenomenological approach to development that allows for better theoretical discriminations of narrative as a semiotic resource, and can thus assist adults in truly listening to children.
|
|
9. |
- Mulder, Bernard Johann, et al.
(author)
-
Sweden
- 2008
-
In: International labor and employment laws. Vol. 2 B. - Arlington : BNA Books. ; :3
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
|
|
10. |
- Papis-Almansa, Marta
(author)
-
The End Does Not Justify the Means : On How the Secondary EU Law Infringes the Primary EU Law in the Light of the Recent Judgments of the CJEU*
- 2023
-
In: Intertax. - : Kluwer Law International. - 0165-2826 .- 1875-8347. ; 51:8-9, s. 612-629
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The constitutional character of the Union legal order based on the rule of law requires that secondary sources of Union law are not infringing the primary sources, including the Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFR). The latter’s importance as a valid instrument to be invoked against measures that are excessive in their interference with the fundamental rights has recently been reinforced by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the judgments in cases such as C-694/20, Orde van Vlaamse Balies and Others, and joined cases C-37/20 and C-601/20, Luxembourg Business Registers and Sovim. The CJEU invalidated provisions of the Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC6) and 5AMLD which reminded that this is the case even when rules are motivated by important collective interests. These include the combat against tax evasion and tax fraud and enhancing broadly understood transparency and are agreed upon and are ‘validated’ by a Union’s legislature. The lessons to be learned are not to be underestimated. Understanding where the limits lie is decisive for valid law making and law enforcement as well as for effectively invoking the rights of individuals and businesses.
|
|