Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:00d5ad67-e55a-47ba-8a31-750866e6989b"
Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:00d5ad67-e55a-47ba-8a31-750866e6989b" > Use of the BOADICEA...
- 1 av 1
- Föregående post
- Nästa post
- Till träfflistan
Use of the BOADICEA Web Application in clinical practice : appraisals by clinicians from various countries
-
- Brédart, Anne (författare)
- Paris Descartes University,Curie Institute, Paris
-
- Kop, Jean Luc (författare)
- University of Lorraine
-
- Antoniou, Antonis C. (författare)
- University of Cambridge
- visa fler...
- visa färre...
- (creator_code:org_t)
- 2017-06-16
- 2018
- Engelska.
- Ingår i: Familial Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1389-9600 .- 1573-7292. ; 17:1, s. 31-41
- Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- The ‘BOADICEA’ Web Application (BWA) used to assess breast cancer risk, is currently being further developed, to integrate additional genetic and non-genetic factors. We surveyed clinicians’ perceived acceptability of the existing BWA v3. An online survey was conducted through the BOADICEA website, and the British, Dutch, French and Swedish genetics societies. Cross-sectional data from 443 participants who provided at least 50% responses were analysed. Respondents varied in age and, clinical seniority, but mainly comprised women (77%) and genetics professionals (82%). Some expressed negative opinions about the scientific validity of BOADICEA (9%) and BWA v3 risk presentations (7–9%). Data entry time (62%), clinical utility (22%) and ease of communicating BWA v3 risks (13–17%) received additional negative appraisals. In multivariate analyses, controlling for gender and country, data entry time was perceived as longer by genetic counsellors than clinical geneticists (p < 0.05). Respondents who (1) considered hormonal BC risk factors as more important (p < 0.01), and (2) communicated numerical risk estimates more frequently (p < 0.001), judged BWA v3 of lower clinical utility. Respondents who carried out less frequent clinical activity (p < 0.01) and respondents with ‘11 to 15 years’ seniority (p < 0.01) had less favourable opinions of BWA v3 risk presentations. Seniority of ‘6 to 10 years’ (p < 0.05) and more frequent numerical risk communication (p < 0.05) were associated with higher fear of communicating the BWA v3 risks to patients. The level of genetics training did not affect opinions. Further development of BWA should consider technological, genetics service delivery and training initiatives.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- Appraisal
- Breast cancer
- Clinical practice
- Risk prediction model
- Survey
- Tool
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- art (ämneskategori)
- ref (ämneskategori)
- 1 av 1
- Föregående post
- Nästa post
- Till träfflistan
Hitta mer i SwePub
- Av författaren/redakt...
- Brédart, Anne
- Kop, Jean Luc
- Antoniou, Antoni ...
- Cunningham, Alex ...
- de Pauw, Antoine
- Tischkowitz, Mar ...
- visa fler...
- Ehrencrona, Hans
- Dolbeault, Sylvi ...
- Robieux, Léonore
- Rhiem, Kerstin
- Easton, Douglas ...
- Devilee, Peter
- Stoppa-Lyonnet, ...
- Schmutlzer, Rita
- visa färre...
- Om ämnet
-
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
- och Klinisk medicin
- och Cancer och onkol ...
- Artiklar i publikationen
- Familial Cancer
- Av lärosätet
- Lunds universitet
Sök utanför SwePub
- Sök vidare i:
- Google Book Search
- Google Scholar
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
- Copyright © LIBRIS - Nationella bibliotekssystem
- LIBRIS.kb.se
