SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

hsv:(SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP)
 

Sökning: hsv:(SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP) > Umeå universitet > (2020) > Contextualizing tec...

  • Ottemo, Andreas,1979Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för pedagogik och specialpedagogik,Department of Education and Special Education,Department of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden (författare)

Contextualizing technology: Between gender pluralization and class reproduction

  • Artikel/kapitelEngelska2020

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

  • 2020-04-14
  • Wiley,2020

Nummerbeteckningar

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/293140
  • https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/293140URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21576DOI
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-169658URI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

  • Språk:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

Klassifikation

  • Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

  • A diverse body of feminist scholarship has addressed the masculine orientation of Western engineering education for at least four decades. Among critiques specifically targeting curriculum, a recurrent line of argumentation highlights its reductionist framing and narrow focus on mathematics and technology. The argument is that these traits represent a masculine orientation and that women would gain from a curriculum more oriented towards the context and applicability of technical knowledge. Simultaneously, researchers working in a Bernsteinian, social realist, educational tradition have suggested that, from a social-class perspective, it is important to provide all students with access to theoretical, abstract and context-independent knowledge. This article explores the resultant, theoretical tension between these two positions. Our empirical starting point is a recently completed ethnographic study of a male-dominated bachelor's degree engineering program in Sweden. This program's curriculum repeatedly emphasizes the value of experiential and contextually rooted knowledge over contextless and mathematically modeled knowledge. Borrowing Bernstein's terminology, we argue that such emphasis represents a privileging of horizontal discourse over vertical and that, as such, said curriculum potentially deprives the male, working-class students of access to powerful knowledge. We further highlight how the program represents a poor target for the line of feminist critique identified above, despite being strongly male dominated. We thereby shed light on challenges related to formulating (intersectional) critiques of the engineering curriculum simultaneously attentive to both class and gender. Conclusively, we argue that efforts directed at making the engineering curriculum more inclusive can learn from both feminist and social realist lines of argumentation.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

  • Berge, Maria,1979-Umeå universitet,Institutionen för naturvetenskapernas och matematikens didaktik(Swepub:umu)mabe0313 (författare)
  • Silfver, Eva,1958-Umeå universitet,Pedagogiska institutionen(Swepub:umu)evny0002 (författare)
  • Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för pedagogik och specialpedagogik (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

  • Ingår i:Science Education: Wiley104:4, s. 693-7130036-83261098-237X

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy