Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
WFRF:(Bane Anita)
Sökning: WFRF:(Bane Anita) > Analytical validati...
Analytical validation of a standardized scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicenter collaboration
-
- Leung, Samuel CY (författare)
- University of British Columbia
-
- Nielsen, Torsten (författare)
- University of British Columbia
-
- Zabaglo, Lila A (författare)
- Institute of Cancer Research London
- visa fler...
- visa färre...
- (creator_code:org_t)
- 2019-07-08
- 2019
- Engelska 11 s.
- Ingår i: Histopathology. - : Wiley. - 0309-0167 .- 1365-2559. ; 75:2, s. 225-235
- Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Aims: The nuclear proliferation marker Ki67 assayed by immunohistochemistry has multiple potential uses in breast cancer, but an unacceptable level of interlaboratory variability has hampered its clinical utility. The International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group has undertaken a systematic programme to determine whether Ki67 measurement can be analytically validated and standardised among laboratories. This study addresses whether acceptable scoring reproducibility can be achieved on excision whole sections.Methods and results: Adjacent sections from 30 primary ER+ breast cancers were centrally stained for Ki67 and sections were circulated among 23 pathologists in 12 countries. All pathologists scored Ki67 by two methods: (i) global: four fields of 100 tumour cells each were selected to reflect observed heterogeneity in nuclear staining; (ii) hot‐spot: the field with highest apparent Ki67 index was selected and up to 500 cells scored. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the global method [confidence interval (CI) = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.799–0.93] marginally met the prespecified success criterion (lower 95% CI ≥ 0.8), while the ICC for the hot‐spot method (0.83; 95% CI = 0.74–0.90) did not. Visually, interobserver concordance in location of selected hot‐spots varies between cases. The median times for scoring were 9 and 6 min for global and hot‐spot methods, respectively.Conclusions: The global scoring method demonstrates adequate reproducibility to warrant next steps towards evaluation for technical and clinical validity in appropriate cohorts of cases. The time taken for scoring by either method is practical using counting software we are making publicly available. Establishment of external quality assessment schemes is likely to improve the reproducibility between laboratories further.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- art (ämneskategori)
- ref (ämneskategori)
Hitta mer i SwePub
- Av författaren/redakt...
- Leung, Samuel CY
- Nielsen, Torsten
- Zabaglo, Lila A
- Arun, Indu
- Badve, Sunil S
- Bane, Anita L
- visa fler...
- Bartlett, John
- Borgquist, Signe
- Chang, Martin C
- Dodson, A
- Ehinger, Anna
- Fineberg, Susan
- Focke, Cornelia
- Gao, Dongxia
- Gown, Allen M
- Gutierrez, Carol ...
- Hugh, Judith C
- Kos, Zuzana
- Laenkholm, Anne ...
- Mastropasqua, Ma ...
- Moriya, Takuya
- Nofech-Mozes, Sh ...
- Osborne, C Kent
- Penault-Llorca, ...
- Piper, Tammy
- Sakatani, Takash ...
- Salgado, Roberto
- Starczynski, Jan ...
- Sugie, Tomoharu
- van der Vegt, Be ...
- Viale, Giuseppe
- Hayes, Daniel
- McShane, Lisa M
- Dowsett, Mitch
- visa färre...
- Om ämnet
-
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
- och Klinisk medicin
- och Cancer och onkol ...
- Artiklar i publikationen
- Histopathology
- Av lärosätet
- Lunds universitet
Sök utanför SwePub
- Sök vidare i:
- Google Book Search
- Google Scholar
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
- Copyright © LIBRIS - Nationella bibliotekssystem
- LIBRIS.kb.se
