SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-114645"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-114645" > Reproducibility of ...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00004432naa a2200637 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:umu-114645
003SwePub
008160125s2015 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
024a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1146452 URI
024a https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu1912 DOI
040 a (SwePub)umu
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
100a Martin-Ruiz, Carmen M4 aut
2451 0a Reproducibility of telomere length assessment :b an international collaborative study
264 c 2014-09-19
264 1b Oxford University Press,c 2015
338 a electronic2 rdacarrier
520 a Background: Telomere length is a putative biomarker of ageing, morbidity and mortality. Its application is hampered by lack of widely applicable reference ranges and uncertainty regarding the present limits of measurement reproducibility within and between laboratories. Methods: We instigated an international collaborative study of telomere length assessment: 10 different laboratories, employing 3 different techniques [Southern blotting, single telomere length analysis (STELA) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR)] performed two rounds of fully blinded measurements on 10 human DNA samples per round to enable unbiased assessment of intra- and inter-batch variation between laboratories and techniques. Results: Absolute results from different laboratories differed widely and could thus not be compared directly, but rankings of relative telomere lengths were highly correlated (correlation coefficients of 0.63-0.99). Intra-technique correlations were similar for Southern blotting and qPCR and were stronger than inter-technique ones. However, inter-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) averaged about 10% for Southern blotting and STELA and more than 20% for qPCR. This difference was compensated for by a higher dynamic range for the qPCR method as shown by equal variance after z-scoring. Technical variation per laboratory, measured as median of intra- and inter-batch CVs, ranged from 1.4% to 9.5%, with differences between laboratories only marginally significant (P = 0.06). Gel-based and PCR-based techniques were not different in accuracy. Conclusions: Intra- and inter-laboratory technical variation severely limits the usefulness of data pooling and excludes sharing of reference ranges between laboratories. We propose to establish a common set of physical telomere length standards to improve comparability of telomere length estimates between laboratories.
650 7a MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAPx Hälsovetenskapx Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi0 (SwePub)303022 hsv//swe
650 7a MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCESx Health Sciencesx Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology0 (SwePub)303022 hsv//eng
653 a Ageing
653 a telomeres
653 a variation
653 a biomarker
653 a human
700a Baird, Duncan4 aut
700a Roger, Laureline4 aut
700a Boukamp, Petra4 aut
700a Krunic, Damir4 aut
700a Cawthon, Richard4 aut
700a Dokter, Martin M4 aut
700a van der Harst, Pim4 aut
700a Bekaert, Sofie4 aut
700a de Meyer, Tim4 aut
700a Roos, Göranu Umeå universitet,Patologi4 aut0 (Swepub:umu)goro0001
700a Svenson, Ulrikau Umeå universitet,Patologi4 aut0 (Swepub:umu)ulason03
700a Codd, Veryan4 aut
700a Samani, Nilesh J4 aut
700a McGlynn, Liane4 aut
700a Shiels, Paul G4 aut
700a Pooley, Karen A4 aut
700a Dunning, Alison M4 aut
700a Cooper, Rachel4 aut
700a Wong, Andrew4 aut
700a Kingston, Andrew4 aut
700a von Zglinicki, Thomas4 aut
710a Umeå universitetb Patologi4 org
773t International Journal of Epidemiologyd : Oxford University Pressg 44:5, s. 1673-1683q 44:5<1673-1683x 0300-5771x 1464-3685
856u https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu191y Fulltext
856u https://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:897391/FULLTEXT01.pdfx primaryx Raw objecty fulltext:print
856u https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu191
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-114645
8564 8u https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu191

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy