SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-289169"
 

Search: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-289169" > Outcome of segmenta...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Lundin, ErikUppsala universitet,Kolorektalkirurgi (author)

Outcome of segmental colonic resection for slow-transit constipation.

  • Article/chapterEnglish2002

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2002-11-29
  • Oxford University Press (OUP),2002
  • printrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:uu-289169
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-289169URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02213.xDOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • BACKGROUND: The standard surgical treatment for slow-transit constipation (STC) is subtotal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis. A segmental resection may serve the same purpose, but with a reduced risk of side-effects such as diarrhoea or incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional results following segmental resection in a consecutive series of patients with STC.METHODS: Selection criteria included prolonged segmental transit on oral 111In-labelled diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid scintigraphic transit study, and disabling symptoms resistant to medical therapy and treatment of outlet obstruction. Twenty-eight patients (26 women, median age 52 years) were treated with segmental resection and followed prospectively with a validated questionnaire.RESULTS: After a median of 50 (range 16-78) months, 23 patients were pleased with the outcome. The median (range) stool frequency increased from 1 (0-7) to 7 (0-63) per week (P < 0.001). The number of patients passing hard stools and straining excessively decreased (P = 0.016 and P = 0.041, respectively). The median incontinence score was unchanged. Rectal sensory thresholds were higher in patients in whom the treatment failed (P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: With a symptomatic relief comparable to that after ileorectal anastomosis and less severe side-effects, segmental colectomy may be a better alternative for selected patients with STC. Thorough preoperative evaluation is important and impaired rectal sensation may predict a poor outcome.

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Karlbom, Urban (author)
  • Påhlman, LarsUppsala universitet,Kolorektalkirurgi(Swepub:uu)larspahl (author)
  • Graf, WilhelmUppsala universitet,Kolorektalkirurgi(Swepub:uu)wilhgraf (author)
  • Uppsala universitetKolorektalkirurgi (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:British Journal of Surgery: Oxford University Press (OUP)89:100007-13231365-2168

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Lundin, Erik
Karlbom, Urban
Påhlman, Lars
Graf, Wilhelm
Articles in the publication
British Journal ...
By the university
Uppsala University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view