SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:ebf9ced3-99e3-4f53-bcab-ec8cc84b1b7a"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:ebf9ced3-99e3-4f53-bcab-ec8cc84b1b7a" > Iran: A Clash of Tw...

  • Banakar, RezaLund University,Lunds universitet,Rättssociologiska institutionen,Samhällsvetenskapliga institutioner och centrumbildningar,Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten,Department of Sociology of Law,Departments of Administrative, Economic and Social Sciences,Faculty of Social Sciences (författare)

Iran: A Clash of Two Cultures?

  • 1
  • Artikel/kapitelEngelska2020

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

  • 2020
  • electronicrdacarrier

Nummerbeteckningar

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:ebf9ced3-99e3-4f53-bcab-ec8cc84b1b7a
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/ebf9ced3-99e3-4f53-bcab-ec8cc84b1b7aURI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

  • Språk:engelska
  • Sammanfattning på:engelska &svenska

Ingår i deldatabas

Klassifikation

  • Ämneskategori:kap swepub-publicationtype
  • Ämneskategori:vet swepub-contenttype

Anmärkningar

  • Since the 1979 Revolution, the clerical regime in Iran has been limiting the legal profession’s autonomy by preventing members of the Iranian Bar Association (IBA) from freely electing their Board of Directors and by establishing a new body of lawyers—legal advisors of the judiciary—to contest the IBA’s professional monopoly. Clerics have even attempted to bring the legal profession under the control of the Ministry of Justice and merge it with the legal advisors. The IBA’s struggle to remain a civil society organisation independent of the judiciary offers a vantage point from which to explore the role of the legal profession in Iranian society and the legal system of the Islamic Republic. Why does the Iranian judiciary oppose an independent legal profession, and why does the profession refuse to capitulate? What are the implications of this ongoing conflict for the legal order of the Islamic Republic, whose political elite consists mainly of Islamic jurists? What are the socio-cultural consequences of undermining the integrity and autonomy of the legal profession? These questions will guide our inquiry.After discussing the IBA’s development before and after the 1979 Revolution, we describe how practising attorneys view the IBA, advocacy, legal practice, legal services and their troubled relationship with the judiciary. They recount the obstacles they encounter within a politicised judicial order and explain how they preserve professional integrity within a legal system that lacks the public’s confidence. We conclude by arguing that the Islamic Republic’s attempt to subordinate the legal profession to administrative and ideological control by the judiciary reflects the clash of two legal cultures. Iranian judges reconstruct and apply Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) as part of their efforts to deliver substantive justice within a codified legal system, while IBA attorneys understand and seek to practise law consistent with the ideals of due process, certainty and uniformity in legal decision-making.
  • Since the 1979 Revolution, the clerical regime in Iran has been limiting the legal profession’s autonomy by preventing members of the Iranian Bar Association (IBA) from freely electing their Board of Directors and by establishing a new body of lawyers—legal advisors of the judiciary—to contest the IBA’s professional monopoly. Clerics have even attempted to bring the legal profession under the control of the Ministry of Justice and merge it with the legal advisors. The IBA’s struggle to remain a civil society organisation independent of the judiciary offers a vantage point from which to explore the role of the legal profession in Iranian society and the legal system of the Islamic Republic. Why does the Iranian judiciary oppose an independent legal profession, and why does the profession refuse to capitulate? What are the implications of this ongoing conflict for the legal order of the Islamic Republic, whose political elite consists mainly of Islamic jurists? What are the socio-cultural consequences of undermining the integrity and autonomy of the legal profession? These questions will guide our inquiry.After discussing the IBA’s development before and after the 1979 Revolution, we describe how practising attorneys view the IBA, advocacy, legal practice, legal services and their troubled relationship with the judiciary. They recount the obstacles they encounter within a politicised judicial order and explain how they preserve professional integrity within a legal system that lacks the public’s confidence. We conclude by arguing that the Islamic Republic’s attempt to subordinate the legal profession to administrative and ideological control by the judiciary reflects the clash of two legal cultures. Iranian judges reconstruct and apply Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) as part of their efforts to deliver substantive justice within a codified legal system, while IBA attorneys understand and seek to practise law consistent with the ideals of due process, certainty and uniformity in legal decision-making.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

  • Keyvan, Ziaee (författare)
  • Richard, Abel (redaktör/utgivare)
  • Hammerslev, Ole (redaktör/utgivare)
  • Sommerlad, Hilary (redaktör/utgivare)
  • Schultz, Ulrike (redaktör/utgivare)
  • Rättssociologiska institutionenSamhällsvetenskapliga institutioner och centrumbildningar (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

  • Ingår i:Lawyers in 21st Century : Vol1: National Reports - Vol1: National Reports19781509915156

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy