SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-178070"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-178070" > Individualized Esti...

Individualized Estimation of the Benefit of Radical Prostatectomy from the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Randomized Trial

Vickers, Andrew (författare)
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY, United States
Bennette, Caroline (författare)
Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, Seattle WA, United States
Steineck, Gunnar (författare)
Karolinska Institutet
visa fler...
Adami, Hans-Olov (författare)
Karolinska Institutet
Johansson, J. E., 1956- (författare)
Urologen, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
Bill-Axelson, Anna (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Urologkirurgi,University Hospital Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
Palmgren, Juni (författare)
Karolinska Institutet
Garmo, Hans (författare)
King's College London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Regional Oncologic Centre Uppsala/Örebro, Uppsala, Sweden
Holmberg, Lars (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Endokrinkirurgi,Regional Oncologic Centre Uppsala/Örebro, Uppsala, Sweden
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2012
2012
Engelska.
Ingår i: European Urology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0302-2838 .- 1873-7560. ; 62:2, s. 204-209
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: Although there is randomized evidence that radical prostatectomy improves survival, there are few data on how benefit varies by baseline risk. Objective: We aimed to create a statistical model to calculate the decrease in risk of death associated with surgery for an individual patient, using stage, grade, prostate-specific antigen, and age as predictors. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 695 men with T1 or T2 prostate cancer participated in the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group 4 trial (SPCG-4). Intervention: Patients in SPCG-4 were randomized to radical prostatectomy or conservative management. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Competing risk models were created separately for the radical prostatectomy and the watchful waiting group, with the difference between model predictions constituting the estimated benefit for an individual patient. Results and limitations: Individualized predictions of surgery benefit varied widely depending on age and tumor characteristics. At 65 yr of age, the absolute 10-yr risk reduction in prostate cancer mortality attributable to radical prostatectomy ranged from 4.5% to 17.2% for low-versus high-risk patients. Little expected benefit was associated with surgery much beyond age 70. Only about a quarter of men had an individualized benefit within even 50% of the mean. A limitation is that estimates from SPCG-4 have to be applied cautiously to contemporary patients. Conclusions: Our model suggests that it is hard to justify surgery in patients with Gleason 6, T1 disease or in those patients much above 70 yr of age. Conversely, surgery seems unequivocally of benefit for patients who have Gleason 8, or Gleason 7, stage T2. For patients with Gleason 6 T2 and Gleason 7 T1, treatment is more of a judgment call, depending on patient preference and other clinical findings, such as the number of positive biopsy cores and comorbidities. 

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Urologi och njurmedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Urology and Nephrology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Prostatic neoplasms
Statistics and research design
Randomized controlled trial
Prostatectomy

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy