SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Antoniou Antonis C.)
 

Search: WFRF:(Antoniou Antonis C.) > Clinicians’ use of ...

Clinicians’ use of breast cancer risk assessment tools according to their perceived importance of breast cancer risk factors : an international survey

Brédart, Anne (author)
Curie Institute, Paris,Paris Descartes University
Kop, Jean Luc (author)
University of Lorraine
Antoniou, Antonis C. (author)
University of Cambridge
show more...
Cunningham, Alex P. (author)
University of Cambridge
de Pauw, Antoine (author)
Curie Institute, Paris
Tischkowitz, Marc (author)
University of Cambridge
Ehrencrona, Hans (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Avdelningen för klinisk genetik,Institutionen för laboratoriemedicin,Medicinska fakulteten,Division of Clinical Genetics,Department of Laboratory Medicine,Faculty of Medicine
Schmidt, Marjanka K. (author)
Netherlands Cancer Institute
Dolbeault, Sylvie (author)
University of Paris-Saclay,Curie Institute, Paris
Rhiem, Kerstin (author)
University Hospital of Cologne
Easton, Douglas F. (author)
University of Cambridge
Devilee, Peter (author)
Leiden University Medical Centre
Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique (author)
Curie Institute, Paris
Schmutlzer, Rita (author)
University Hospital of Cologne
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018-03-05
2019
English.
In: Journal of Community Genetics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1868-310X .- 1868-6001. ; 10:1, s. 61-71
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • The BOADICEA breast cancer (BC) risk assessment model and its associated Web Application v3 (BWA) tool are being extended to incorporate additional genetic and non-genetic BC risk factors. From an online survey through the BOADICEA website and UK, Dutch, French and Swedish national genetic societies, we explored the relationships between the usage frequencies of the BWA and six other common BC risk assessment tools and respondents’ perceived importance of BC risk factors. Respondents (N = 443) varied in age, country and clinical seniority but comprised mainly genetics health professionals (82%) and BWA users (93%). Oncology professionals perceived reproductive, hormonal (exogenous) and lifestyle BC risk factors as more important in BC risk assessment compared to genetics professionals (p values < 0.05 to 0.0001). BWA was used more frequently by respondents who gave high weight to breast tumour pathology and low weight to personal BC history as BC risk factors. BWA use was positively related to the weight given to hormonal BC risk factors. The importance attributed to lifestyle and BMI BC risk factors was not associated with the use of BWA or any of the other tools. Next version of the BWA encompassing additional BC risk factors will facilitate more comprehensive BC risk assessment in genetics and oncology practice.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

BOADICEA
Breast cancer risk assessment
Clinical practice
Factors
Survey
Tools

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view