SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Auvinen Anssi)
 

Search: WFRF:(Auvinen Anssi) > Test sensitivity in...

Test sensitivity in the European prostate cancer screening trial: results from Finland, Sweden, and the Netherlands.

Auvinen, Anssi (author)
Raitanen, Jani (author)
Moss, Sue (author)
show more...
de Koning, Harry J (author)
Hugosson, Jonas, 1955 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper,Institute of Clinical Sciences
Tammela, Teuvo (author)
Roobol, Monique (author)
Lilja, Hans (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Klinisk kemi, Malmö,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Clinical Chemistry, Malmö,Lund University Research Groups
Hakama, Matti (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2009
2009
English.
In: Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. - 1538-7755. ; 18:7, s. 2000-5
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Test sensitivity pertains to the ability of a test to identify subjects with the target disorder. In cancer screening, test sensitivity can be estimated using interval cancer incidence as an indicator of false-negative result. A randomized trial provides the optimal approach for estimating test sensitivity, as the control arm provides the expected rates. We estimated the sensitivity of the prostate-specific antigen test using incidence method, i.e., based on incidence of interval cancer among subjects with negative screening results, compared with that in the control arm. Data from three centers in the European randomized screening trial were used to estimate interval cancer incidence (I(I)) among 39,389 men with negative screening tests. This was compared with incidence among the 79,525 men in the control arm of the trial (I(c)) to estimate test sensitivity (S = 1 - I(I) / I(C)). Confidence intervals were calculated using simulations, assuming that the number of cases follows a Poisson distribution. The estimated test sensitivity following the first screen was 0.87 (0.83-0.92) in Finland, 0.87 (0.62-1.00) in Sweden, and 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.96) in the Netherlands. There was some indication of a higher test sensitivity for aggressive cancers (0.85-0.98 for non-organ-confined cases or Gleason 8-10) and for the second screening round (approximately 0.85-0.95). Test sensitivity varied to some extent between the three centers in the European trial, probably reflecting variation in screening protocols, but was acceptable in the first screening round, and may be better for aggressive cancers and in the second screening round.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Urologi och njurmedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Urology and Nephrology (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Aged
Confidence Intervals
Finland
epidemiology
Humans
Incidence
Male
Mass Screening
methods
Middle Aged
Netherlands
epidemiology
Prostate-Specific Antigen
blood
Prostatic Neoplasms
blood
diagnosis
epidemiology
pathology
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sweden
epidemiology
Time Factors

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view