SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-175128"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-175128" > Limitations of Avai...

Limitations of Available Studies Prevent Reliable Comparison Between Tumour Ablation and Partial Nephrectomy for Patients with Localised Renal Masses : A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Renal Cell Cancer Guideline Panel

Abu-Ghanem, Yasmin (författare)
Fernandez-Pello, Sergio (författare)
Bex, Axel (författare)
visa fler...
Ljungberg, Börje, Professor, 1949- (författare)
Umeå universitet,Urologi och andrologi
Albiges, Laurence (författare)
Dabestani, Saeed (författare)
Giles, Rachel H. (författare)
Hofmann, Fabian (författare)
Hora, Milan (författare)
Kuczyk, Markus A. (författare)
Kuusk, Teele (författare)
Marconi, Lorenzo (författare)
Merseburger, Axel S. (författare)
Tahbaz, Rana (författare)
Staehler, Michael (författare)
Volpe, Alessandro (författare)
Powles, Thomas (författare)
Lam, Thomas B. (författare)
Bensalah, Karim (författare)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier, 2020
2020
Engelska.
Ingår i: European Urology Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 2588-9311. ; 3:4, s. 423-442
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • The European Association of Urology (EAU) Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel performed a protocol-driven systematic review (SR) on thermal ablation (TA) compared with partial nephrectomy (PN) for T1N0M0 renal masses, in order to provide evidence to support its recommendations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and only comparative studies published between 2000 and 2019 were included. Twenty-six nonrandomised comparative studies were included, recruiting a total of 167 80 patients. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment revealed high or uncertain RoB across all studies, with the vast majority being retrospective, observational studies with poorly matched controls and short follow-up. Limited data showed TA to be safe, but its long-term oncological effectiveness compared with PN remains uncertain. A quality assessment of pre-existing SRs (n = 11) on the topic, using AMSTAR, revealed that all SRs had low confidence rating, with all but two SRs being rated critically low. In conclusion, the current data are inadequate to make any strong and clear conclusions regarding the clinical effectiveness of TA for treating T1N0M0 renal masses compared with PN. Therefore, TA may be cautiously considered an alternative to PN for T1N0M0 renal masses, but patients must be counselled carefully regarding the prevailing uncertainties. We recommend specific steps to improve the evidence base based on robust primary and secondary studies.Patient summary: In this report, we looked at the literature to determine the effectiveness of thermoablation (TA) in the treatment of small kidney tumours compared with surgical removal. We found that TA could cautiously be offered as an option due to many remaining uncertainties regarding its effectiveness.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Urologi och njurmedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Urology and Nephrology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Renal cell cancer
Ablative therapy
Partial nephrectomy
Prognosis
European Association of Urology guidelines

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
for (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy