SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Markenroth Bloch Karin)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Markenroth Bloch Karin) > Validation and repr...

Validation and reproducibility of cardiovascular 4D-flow MRI from two vendors using 2 × 2 parallel imaging acceleration in pulsatile flow phantom and in vivo with and without respiratory gating

Bock, Jelena (författare)
Lund University,Skåne University Hospital
Töger, Johannes (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Klinisk fysiologi, Lund,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Diagnostic Radiology, (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Clinical Physiology (Lund),Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Skåne University Hospital
Bidhult, Sebastian (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Avdelningen för Biomedicinsk teknik,Institutionen för biomedicinsk teknik,Institutioner vid LTH,Lunds Tekniska Högskola,Klinisk fysiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Department of Biomedical Engineering,Departments at LTH,Faculty of Engineering, LTH,Clinical Physiology (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Skåne University Hospital
visa fler...
Markenroth Bloch, Karin (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Lund University Bioimaging Center,Medicinska fakulteten,Faculty of Medicine,Philips Healthcare, Sweden
Arvidsson, Per (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Klinisk fysiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Clinical Physiology (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Skåne University Hospital
Kanski, Mikael (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Klinisk fysiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Clinical Physiology (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Skåne University Hospital
Arheden, Håkan (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Klinisk fysiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Clinical Physiology (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Skåne University Hospital
Testud, Frederik (författare)
Siemens Healthcare AB
Greiser, Andreas (författare)
Siemens Healthineers
Heiberg, Einar (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Avdelningen för Biomedicinsk teknik,Institutionen för biomedicinsk teknik,Institutioner vid LTH,Lunds Tekniska Högskola,Klinisk fysiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Department of Biomedical Engineering,Departments at LTH,Faculty of Engineering, LTH,Clinical Physiology (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Skåne University Hospital
Carlsson, Marcus (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Klinisk fysiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Clinical Physiology (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Skåne University Hospital
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018-06-26
2018
Engelska.
Ingår i: Acta Radiologica. - : SAGE Publications. - 0284-1851 .- 1600-0455.
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used. Purpose: To validate 4D-flow sequences in phantom and in vivo, comparing volume flow and kinetic energy (KE) head-to-head, with and without respiratory gating. Material and Methods: Achieva dStream (Philips Healthcare) and MAGNETOM Aera (Siemens Healthcare) 1.5-T scanners were used. Phantom validation measured pulsatile, three-dimensional flow with 4D-flow MRI and laser particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) as reference standard. Ten healthy participants underwent three cardiac MRI examinations each, consisting of cine-imaging, 2D-flow (aorta, pulmonary artery), and 2 × 2 accelerated 4D-flow with (Resp+) and without (Resp−) respiratory gating. Examinations were acquired consecutively on both scanners and one examination repeated within two weeks. Volume flow in the great vessels was compared between 2D- and 4D-flow. KE were calculated for all time phases and voxels in the left ventricle. Results: Phantom results showed high accuracy and precision for both scanners. In vivo, higher accuracy and precision (P < 0.001) was found for volume flow for the Aera prototype with Resp+ (–3.7 ± 10.4 mL, r = 0.89) compared to the Achieva product sequence (–17.8 ± 18.6 mL, r = 0.56). 4D-flow Resp− on Aera had somewhat larger bias (–9.3 ± 9.6 mL, r = 0.90) compared to Resp+ (P = 0.005). KE measurements showed larger differences between scanners on the same day compared to the same scanner at different days. Conclusion: Sequence-specific in vivo validation of 4D-flow is needed before clinical use. 4D-flow with the Aera prototype sequence with a clinically acceptable acquisition time (<10 min) showed acceptable bias in healthy controls to be considered for clinical use. Intra-individual KE comparisons should use the same sequence.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Radiologi och bildbehandling (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

4D-flow
cardiac output
heart failure
valvular regurgitation

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy