SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:95ed936d-6fe7-4fce-91fc-14bb51345041"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:95ed936d-6fe7-4fce-91fc-14bb51345041" > Water-assisted colo...

Water-assisted colonoscopy: an international modified Delphi review on definitions and practice recommendations

Cadoni, Sergio (författare)
ATS Sardegna , ASSL Carbonia Presidio Ospedaliero C.T.O, Iglesias
Thorlacius, Henrik (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Kirurgi,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Surgery,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments
Leung, Felix W. (författare)
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System,University of California, Los Angeles
ATS Sardegna , ASSL Carbonia Presidio Ospedaliero CT.O, Iglesias Kirurgi (creator_code:org_t)
et al 
Elsevier BV, 2021
2021
Engelska 10 s.
Ingår i: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. - : Elsevier BV. - 1097-6779 .- 0016-5107. ; 93:6, s. 1411-1420
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background and Aims: Since 2008, a plethora of research studies has compared the efficacy of water-assisted (aided) colonoscopy (WAC) and underwater resection (UWR) of colorectal lesions with standard colonoscopy. We reviewed and graded the research evidence with potential clinical application. We conducted a modified Delphi consensus among experienced colonoscopists on definitions and practice of water immersion (WI), water exchange (WE), and UWR. Methods: Major databases were searched to obtain research reports that could potentially shape clinical practice related to WAC and UWR. Pertinent references were graded (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Extracted data supporting evidence-based statements were tabulated and provided to respondents. We received responses from 55 (85% surveyed) experienced colonoscopists (37 experts and 18 nonexperts in WAC) from 16 countries in 3 rounds. Voting was conducted anonymously in the second and third round, with ≥80% agreement defined as consensus. We aimed to obtain consensus in all statements. Results: In the first and the second modified Delphi rounds, 20 proposed statements were decreased to 14 and then 11 statements. After the third round, the combined responses from all respondents depicted the consensus in 11 statements (S): definitions of WI (S1) and WE (S2), procedural features (S3-S5), impact on bowel cleanliness (S6), adenoma detection (S7), pain score (S8), and UWR (S9-S11). Conclusions: The most important consensus statements are that WI and WE are not the same in implementation and outcomes. Because studies that could potentially shape clinical practice of WAC and UWR were chosen for review, this modified Delphi consensus supports recommendations for the use of WAC in clinical practice. © 2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kirurgi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Surgery (hsv//eng)

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Cadoni, Sergio
Thorlacius, Henr ...
Leung, Felix W.
Om ämnet
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
och Klinisk medicin
och Kirurgi
Artiklar i publikationen
Gastrointestinal ...
Av lärosätet
Lunds universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy