SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Zaring Olof 1962 )
 

Search: WFRF:(Zaring Olof 1962 ) > Local Political Cap...

Local Political Capital for Innovation in the Global Knowledge Economy

Szücs, Stefan, 1964 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Centrum för forskning om offentlig sektor (CEFOS),Statsvetenskapliga institutionen,Center for Public Sector Research (CEFOS),Department of Political Science,University of Gothenburg
Zaring, Olof, 1962 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutet för innovation och entreprenörskap,Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship,University of Gothenburg
McKelvey, Maureen, 1965 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutet för innovation och entreprenörskap,Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship
show more...
McKelvey, Tomas, 1966 (author)
Göteborgs universitet,University of Gothenburg
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2010
2010
English.
In: Book of Abstracts, XVII World Congress of Sociology, 11-17 July 2010, Gothenburg. ; XVII, s. 472-473
  • Conference paper (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Over the last decade, policy initiatives to promote innovativeness and growth, inspired by normative models of capacity building through industrial clusters, triple helix and innovation systems, have proliferated. Theories of economic development offer several explanations of the emergence of clusters in particular environments. Most theorists would argue that specific, natural, economic, or institutional factors determine capacity building in terms of cluster development. Other theorists emphasize the role of local social networks and phases of regional knowledge-based spaces in explaining the emergence of such capacity building. Neither of these theoretical streams offers systematic explanations of differences in the emergence and success of capacity building, beyond finding that crucial resources are unevenly distributed. The theoretical linkage between triple helix and capacity building through innovation governance is unclear. We still do not have a relevant theory explaining the influence of innovation governance involving local/regional government–industry–university relationships on capacity building leading to successful innovations. Therefore, we are making a proposal to further develop theory by focusing on capacity building through different sequences of innovation governance in relation to components of local political capital - values/norms of identity, networks and local-global relations - in the era of the global knowledge economy.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap -- Övrig annan samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences -- Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Statsvetenskap -- Statsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Political Science -- Political Science (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Företagsekonomi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Economics and Business -- Business Administration (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Ekonomi och näringsliv (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Economics and Business (hsv//eng)

Keyword

political capital
innovation
governance
sequences
local-global relations
political capital

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
kon (subject category)

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view