SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-220437"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-220437" > Non-disclosure of d...

Non-disclosure of developmental neurotoxicity studies obstructs the safety assessment of pesticides in the European Union

Mie, Axel, 1974- (författare)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Stockholms universitet,Institutionen för miljövetenskap,Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Sweden,Institutionen för växtproduktionsekologi,Department of Crop Production Ecology,Karolinska Institute,Stockholm University
Rudén, Christina, 1967- (författare)
Stockholms universitet,Institutionen för miljövetenskap
 (creator_code:org_t)
 
2023
2023
Engelska.
Ingår i: Environmental Health. - 1476-069X. ; 22
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background In the European Union (EU), the safety assessment of plant protection products relies to a large extent on toxicity studies commissioned by the companies producing them. By law, all performed studies must be included in the dossier submitted to authorities when applying for approval or renewal of the active substance.Methods For one type of toxicity, i.e. developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), we evaluated if studies submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had also been disclosed to EU authorities.Results We identified 35 DNT studies submitted to the U.S. EPA and with the corresponding EU dossiers available. Of these, 9 DNT studies (26%) were not disclosed by the pesticide company to EU authorities. For 7 of these studies, we have identified an actual or potential regulatory impact.Conclusions We conclude that (1) non-disclosure of DNT studies to EU authorities, in spite of clear legal requirements, seems to be a recurring phenomenon, (2) the non-disclosure may introduce a bias in the regulatory risk assessment, and (3) without full access to all performed toxicity studies, there can be no reliable safety evaluation of pesticides by EU authorities. We suggest that EU authorities should cross-check their data sets with their counterparts in other jurisdictions. In addition, applications for pesticide approval should be cross-checked against lists of studies performed at test facilities operating under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), to ensure that all studies have been submitted to authorities. Furthermore, rules should be amended so that future studies should be commissioned by authorities rather than companies. This ensures the authorities’ knowledge of existing studies and prevents the economic interest of the company from influencing the design, performance, reporting and dissemination of studies. The rules or practices should also be revised to ensure that non-disclosure of toxicity studies carries a significant legal risk for pesticide companies.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Occupational Health and Environmental Health (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Juridik -- Juridik (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Law -- Law (hsv//eng)
LANTBRUKSVETENSKAPER  -- Annan lantbruksvetenskap -- Miljö- och naturvårdsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES  -- Other Agricultural Sciences -- Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Developmental neurotoxicity
Non-disclosure
Pesticides
Plant protection products
Regulatory assessment
Reporting bias

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy