Understanding Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: A Qualitative Review of the Most Used Frameworks

↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mdh-51083" > Understanding Clini...

1 av 1
Föregående post
Nästa post
Till träfflistan

Jacob, ChristineAnglia Ruskin Univ, East Rd, Cambridge CB1 1PT, England.;Univ Appl Sci Northwestern Switzerland, Brugg, Switzerland. (författare)

Understanding Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools : A Qualitative Review of the Most Used Frameworks

Artikel/kapitelEngelska2020

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

2020-07-06
JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC,2020
printrdacarrier

Nummerbeteckningar

LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:mdh-51083
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-51083URI
https://doi.org/10.2196/18072DOI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

Språk:engelska
Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

SwePubSwePub

Klassifikation

Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
Ämneskategori:for swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

Background: Although there is a push toward encouraging mobile health (mHealth) adoption to harness its potential, there are many challenges that sometimes go beyond the technology to involve other elements such as social, cultural, and organizational factors. Objective: This review aimed to explore which frameworks are used the most, to understand clinicians' adoption of mHealth as well as to identify potential shortcomings in these frameworks. Highlighting these gaps and the main factors that were not specifically covered in the most frequently used frameworks will assist future researchers to include all relevant key factors. Methods: This review was an in-depth subanalysis of a larger systematic review that included research papers published between 2008 and 2018 and focused on the social, organizational, and technical factors impacting clinicians' adoption of mHealth. The initial systematic review included 171 studies, of which 50 studies used a theoretical framework. These 50 studies are the subject of this qualitative review, reflecting further on the frameworks used and how these can help future researchers design studies that investigate the topic of mHealth adoption more robustly. Results: The most commonly used frameworks were different forms of extensions of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM; 17/50, 34%), the diffusion of innovation theory (DOI; 8/50, 16%), and different forms of extensions of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (6/50, 12%). Some studies used a combination of the TAM and DOI frameworks (3/50, 6%), whereas others used the consolidated framework for implementation research (3/50, 6%) and sociotechnical systems (STS) theory (2/50, 4%). The factors cited by more than 20% of the studies were usefulness, output quality, ease of use, technical support, data privacy, self-efficacy, attitude, organizational inner setting, training, leadership engagement, workload, and workflow fit. Most factors could be linked to one framework or another, but there was no single framework that could adequately cover all relevant and specific factors without some expansion. Conclusions: Health care technologies are generally more complex than tools that address individual user needs as they usually support patients with comorbidities who are typically treated by multidisciplinary teams who might even work in different health care organizations. This special nature of how the health care sector operates and its highly regulated nature, the usual budget deficits, and the interdependence between health care organizations necessitate some crucial expansions to existing theoretical frameworks usually used when studying adoption. We propose a shift toward theoretical frameworks that take into account implementation challenges that factor in the complexity of the sociotechnical structure of health care organizations and the interplay between the technical, social, and organizational aspects. Our consolidated framework offers recommendations on which factors to include when investigating clinicians' adoption of mHealth, taking into account all three aspects.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP Annan samhällsvetenskap hsv//swe
SOCIAL SCIENCES Other Social Sciences hsv//eng
telemedicine
smartphone
electronic health record
workflow
workload
workplace
public health practice
technology
perception
health education
mHealth
mobile health
telehealth
eHealth

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

Sanchez-Vazquez, AntonioAnglia Ruskin Univ, Innovat & Management Practice Res Ctr, Cambridge, England. (författare)
Ivory, ChrisAnglia Ruskin Univ, Innovat & Management Practice Res Ctr, Cambridge, England.,IPR(Swepub:mdh)ciy01 (författare)
Anglia Ruskin Univ, East Rd, Cambridge CB1 1PT, England.;Univ Appl Sci Northwestern Switzerland, Brugg, Switzerland.Anglia Ruskin Univ, Innovat & Management Practice Res Ctr, Cambridge, England. (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

Ingår i:JMIR mhealth and uhealth: JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC8:72291-5222

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

JMIR mhealth and uhealth (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

1 av 1
Föregående post
Nästa post
Till träfflistan

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...: Jacob, Christine; Sanchez-Vazquez, ...; Ivory, Chris

Om ämnet

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP: SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...; och Annan samhällsve ...

Artiklar i publikationen: JMIR mhealth and ...

Av lärosätet: Mälardalens universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Sök vidare i:: Google; Google Book Search; Google Scholar

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst. Hantera kakor

LIBRIS.kb.se