| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Johansson, Bengt, 1958-, et al.
(författare)
-
Phantom study of radiation doses outside the target volume brachytherapy versus external radiotherapy of early breast cancer
- 2003
-
Ingår i: Radiotherapy and Oncology. - Amsterdam : Elsevier. - 1879-0887 .- 0167-8140. ; 69:1, s. 107-112
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and purpose: Brachytherapy is sometimes suggested as an adjuvant treatment after surgery of some tumours. When introducing this, it would be useful to have an estimate of the dose distribution to different body sites, both near and distant to target, comparing conventional external irradiation to brachytherapy. The aim of the present study was to determine radiation doses with both methods at different body sites, near and distant to target, in an experimental situation on an operated left sided breast cancer on a female Alderson phantom. Methods: Five external beam treatments with isocentric tangential fields were given by a linear accelerator. A specified dose of 1.0 Gy was given to the whole left sided breast volume. Five interstitial brachytherapy treatments were given to the upper, lateral quadrant of the left breast by a two plane, 10 needles implant. A dose of 1.0 Gy specified according to the Paris system was administered by a pulsed dose rate afterloading machine. Absorbed dose in different fixed dose points were measured by thermoluminescence dosimeters. Results: Both methods yielded an absorbed dose of the same size to the bone marrow and internal organs distant to target, 1.0-1.4% of the prescribed dose. There was a trend of lower doses to the lower half of the trunk and higher doses to the upper half of the trunk, respectively, by brachytherapy. A 90% reduction of absorbed dose with brachytherapy compared to external irradiation was found in the near-target region within 5 cm from target boundary where parts of the left lung and the heart are situated. If an adjuvant dose of 50 Gy is given with the external radiotherapy and brachytherapy, the absorbed dose in a part of the myocardium could be reduced from 31.8 to 2.1 Gy. Conclusions: Near target, brachytherapy yielded a considerably lower absorbed dose which is of special importance when considering radiation effects on the myocard and lungs. We could not demonstrate any difference of importance, in absorbed dose to dose points distant to target. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 5. |
- Kjellén, Elisabeth, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of low dose nicotinamide versus benzamide, administered per os, as radiosensitizers in a C3H mammary carcinoma
- 1988
-
Ingår i: Radiotherapy and Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-0887 .- 0167-8140. ; 12:4, s. 327-331
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We have evaluated if any differences in tumor radiosensitization exist between the two adenosine diphosphate ribosyl transferase (ADPRT) inhibitors nicotinamide and benzamide at fractionated low doses. A significant radiosensitizing effect with nicotinamide at a 10 mg/kg per day dose was found in the tumor model used. We found, however, no radiosensitizing effect with benzamide given according to this schedule.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Olsson, L E, et al.
(författare)
-
Three-dimensional dose mapping from gamma knife treatment using a dosimeter gel and MR-imaging
- 1992
-
Ingår i: Radiotherapy and Oncology. - 0167-8140. ; 24:2, s. 6-82
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A new method has been investigated for the mapping of dose distributions in three dimensions delivered by the Leksell gamma knife. The irradiation unit is used to selectively treat small volumes in the brain with single high doses of ionising radiation--a treatment procedure known as radiosurgery. The dosimetry method investigated utilises a dosimeter gel consisting of ferrous sulphate solution and agarose which is, prior to irradiation, loaded into a cavity in a spherical phantom. Chemical changes induced in the gel by the radiation are measured by means of an MR-scanner. This imaging method permits rapid evaluation of the dose distribution in an irradiated volume. It thus offers a potential verification of individual radiation intracranial target treatment regimes as well as quality assurance measurements, assuming that the precision and accuracy of the dose mapping are adequate. The dose and its distribution registered by the gel dosimeter, in this initial experiment, are in good agreement with corresponding computed data obtained with the KULA treatment planning system of the gamma knife. The gel has thus the potential of being an attractive alternative dose mapping method to those used at present in radiosurgery, i.e. radiographic film and small ionisation chambers. The precision of the dosimeter gel is, however, not yet sufficient high to be used as a basic dosimetry system for the gamma knife.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Weber, Lars, et al.
(författare)
-
Verification of a dynamic wedge implementation in a pencil beam based dose planning system
- 1995
-
Ingår i: Radiotherapy and Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-0887 .- 0167-8140. ; 37:Suppl. 1, s. 26-26
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The use of dynamic movements on linear accelerators during irradiation have found a revised interest lately due to the integration of computers to control the linear accelerator. An example of this is the generation of fields that resemble ordinary wedge fields. These fields are produced by moving one of the collimator blocks during irradiation, i. e. dynamic wedges.A pencil beam based system with the possibility of modelling dynamically modulated dose distributions from collimator movement specifications has extensively been investigated. Special interest has been focused on depth doses, profiles and output factors which have been generated by dynamic wedge fields. The data from the treatment planning system has been verified with measurements in water on a Varian 4 MV linear accelerator.The results indicate that calculations accurately predicts the outcome from dynamic wedges without any additional measurements than those used for characterisation of static open beams.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
