| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Almer, Jakob, et al.
(author)
-
Ischemic QRS prolongation as a biomarker of myocardial injury in STEMI patients
- 2019
-
In: Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. - : Wiley. - 1082-720X. ; 24:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Patients with acute coronary occlusion (ACO) may not only have ischemia-related ST-segment changes but also changes in the QRS complex. It has recently been shown in dogs that a greater ischemic QRS prolongation (IQP) during ACO is related to lower collateral flow. This suggests that greater IQP could indicate more severe ischemia and thereby more rapid infarct development. Therefore, the purpose was to evaluate the relationship between IQP and measures of myocardial injury in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with first-time STEMI were retrospectively included from the recently published SOCCER trial. All patients underwent a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination 2-6 days after the acute event. Infarct size (IS), myocardium at risk (MaR), and myocardial salvage index (MSI) were assessed and related to IQP. IQP measures assessed were; computer-generated QRS duration, QRS duration at maximum ST deviation, absolute IQP and relative IQP, all derived from a pre-PCI, 12-lead ECG.RESULTS: Median absolute IQP was 10 ms (range 0-115 ms). There were no statistically significant correlations between measures of IQP and any of the CMR measures of myocardial injury (absolute IQP vs IS, r = 0.03, p = 0.80; MaR, r = -0.01, p = 0.89; MSI, r = -0.05, p = 0.68).CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous experimental studies, the IQP was limited in patients presenting at the emergency room with first-time STEMI and no correlation was found between IQP and CMR variables of myocardial injury in these patients. Therefore, IQP does not seem to be a suitable biomarker for triaging patients in this clinical context.
|
|
| 3. |
- Axelsson, Karl-Jonas, et al.
(author)
-
Adaptation of ventricular repolarization duration and dispersion during changes in heart rate induced by atrial stimulation.
- 2020
-
In: Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc. - : Wiley. - 1542-474X. ; 25:3
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The duration of ventricular repolarization (VR) and its spatial and temporal heterogeneity are central elements in arrhythmogenesis. We studied the adaptation of VR duration and dispersion and their relationship in healthy human subjects during atrial pacing.Patients 20-50 years of age who were scheduled for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia without preexcitation but otherwise healthy were eligible. Vectorcardiography recordings with Frank leads were used for data collection. Incremental atrial pacing from a coronary sinus electrode was performed by decrements of 10ms/cycle from just above sinus rate, and then kept at a fixed heart rate (HR) just below the Wenckebach rate for ≥5min and then stopped. VR duration was measured as QT and VR dispersion as T area, T amplitude and ventricular gradient. The primary measure (T90 End) was the time to reach 90% change from baseline to the steady state value during and after pacing.A complete study protocol was accomplished in 9 individuals (6 women). VR duration displayed a monophasic adaptation during HR acceleration lasting on average 20s. The median (Q1-Q3) T90 End for QT was 85s (51-104), a delay by a factor >4. All dispersion measures displayed a tri-phasic response pattern during HR acceleration and T90 End was 3-5 times shorter than for VR duration.Even during close to "physiological" conditions, complex and differing response patterns in VR duration and dispersion measures followed changes in HR. Extended knowledge about these responses in disease conditions might assist in risk evaluation and finding therapeutic alternatives.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Bacharova, Ljuba, et al.
(author)
-
ISE/ISHNE expert consensus statement on the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy : The change of the paradigm
- 2023
-
In: Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. - 1082-720X. ; 29:1, s. e13097-
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The ECG diagnosis of LVH is predominantly based on the QRS voltage criteria. The classical paradigm postulates that the increased left ventricular mass generates a stronger electrical field, increasing the leftward and posterior QRS forces, reflected in the augmented QRS amplitude. However, the low sensitivity of voltage criteria has been repeatedly documented. We discuss possible reasons for this shortcoming and proposal of a new paradigm. The theoretical background for voltage measured at the body surface is defined by the solid angle theorem, which relates the measured voltage to spatial and non-spatial determinants. The spatial determinants are represented by the extent of the activation front and the distance of the recording electrodes. The non-spatial determinants comprise electrical characteristics of the myocardium, which are comparatively neglected in the interpretation of the QRS patterns. Various clinical conditions are associated with LVH. These conditions produce considerable diversity of electrical properties alterations thereby modifying the resultant QRS patterns. The spectrum of QRS patterns observed in LVH patients is quite broad, including also left axis deviation, left anterior fascicular block, incomplete and complete left bundle branch blocks, Q waves, and fragmented QRS. Importantly, the QRS complex can be within normal limits. The new paradigm stresses the electrophysiological background in interpreting QRS changes, i.e., the effect of the non-spatial determinants. This postulates that the role of ECG is not to estimate LV size in LVH, but to understand and decode the underlying electrical processes, which are crucial in relation to cardiovascular risk assessment.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Bayés de Luna, Antoni, et al.
(author)
-
Anticoagulation in patients at high risk of stroke without documented atrial fibrillation. Time for a paradigm shift?
- 2017
-
In: Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. - : Wiley. - 1082-720X. ; 22:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently considered a risk factor for stroke. Depending on the severity of clinical factors (risk scores) a recommendation for full anticoagulation is made. Although AF is most certainly a risk factor for ischemic stroke, it is not necessarily the direct cause of it. The causality of association between AF and ischemic stroke is questioned by the reported lack of temporal relation between stroke events and AF paroxysms (or atrial high-rate episodes detected by devices). In different studies, only 2% of patients had subclinical AF > 6 minutes in duration at the time of stroke or systemic embolism. Is it time to consider AF only one more factor of endothelial disarray rather than the main contributor to stroke? In this “opinion paper” we propose to consider not only clinical variables predicting AF/stroke but also electrocardiographic markers of atrial fibrosis, as we postulate this as a strong indicator of risk of AF/stroke. We ask if it is time to change the paradigm and to consider, in some special situations, to protect patients (preventing stroke) who have no evidence of AF.
|
|
| 8. |
- Birnbaum, Yochai, et al.
(author)
-
The Role of the ECG in Diagnosis, Risk Estimation, and Catheterization Laboratory Activation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Consensus Document
- 2014
-
In: Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. - : Wiley. - 1082-720X. ; 19:5, s. 412-425
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most widely used imaging tool helping in diagnosis and initial management of patients presenting with symptoms compatible with acute coronary syndrome. Acute ischemia affects the configuration of the QRS complexes, the ST segments and the T waves. The ECG should be read along with the clinical assessment of the patient. ST segment elevation (and ST depression in leads V-1-V-3) in patients with active symptoms usually indicates acute occlusion of an epicardial artery with ongoing transmural ischemia. These patients should be triaged for emergent reperfusion therapy per current guidelines. However, many patients have ST segment elevation secondary to nonischemic causes. ST depression in leads other than V-1-V-3 usually are indicative of subendocardial ischemia secondary to subocclusion of the epicardial artery, distal embolization to small arteries or spasm supply/demand mismatch. ST depression may also be secondary to nonischemic etiologies, such as left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiomyopathies, etc. Knowing the clinical scenario, comparison to previous ECG and subsequent ECGs (in cases that there are changes in the quality or severity of symptoms) may add in the diagnosis and interpretation in difficult cases. This review addresses the different ECG patterns, typically seen in patients with active symptoms, after resolution of symptoms and the significance of such changes when seen in asymptomatic patients.
|
|
| 9. |
- Brandtvig, Tove Olsson, et al.
(author)
-
Association between left ventricular lead position and intrinsic QRS morphology with regard to clinical outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure
- 2023
-
In: Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. - 1082-720X. ; 28:4
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BackgroundLeft ventricular (LV) lead position may be an important factor for delivering effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We therefore aimed to evaluate the effects of LV lead position, stratified by native QRS morphology, regarding the clinical outcome.MethodsA total of 1295 CRT-implanted patients were retrospectively evaluated. LV lead position was classified as lateral, anterior, inferior, or apical, and was determined using the left and right anterior oblique X-ray views. Kaplan Meier and Cox regression were performed to evaluate the effects on all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization, and the potential interaction between LV lead position and native ECG morphologies.ResultsA total of 1295 patients were included. Patients were aged 69 ± 7 years, 20% were female, 46% received a CRT-Pacemaker (vs. CRT-Defibrillator), mean LVEF was 25% ± 7%, and median follow-up was 3.3 years [IQR 1.6–5–7 years]. Eight hundred and eighty-two patients (68%) had a lateral LV lead location, 207 (16%) anterior, 155 (12%) apical, and 51 (4%) inferior. Patients with lateral LV lead position had larger QRS reduction (−13 ± 27 ms vs. −3 ± 24 ms, p ConclusionsIn patients treated with CRT, non-lateral LV lead positions (including apical, anterior, and inferior positions) were associated with worse clinical outcome and less reduction of QRS duration. This association was strongest for patients with native LBBB or RBBB.
|
|
| 10. |
- Chaudhry, Uzma, et al.
(author)
-
Evaluation of the ECG based Selvester scoring method to estimate myocardial scar burden and predict clinical outcome in patients with left bundle branch block, with comparison to late gadolinium enhancement CMR imaging
- 2017
-
In: Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. - : Wiley. - 1082-720X. ; 22:5
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Myocardial scar burden quantification is an emerging clinical parameter for risk stratification of sudden cardiac death and prediction of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. We investigated the relationships among semiautomated Selvester score burden and late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) assessed scar burden and clinical outcome in patients with underlying heart failure, left bundle branch block (LBBB) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment. Methods: Selvester QRS scoring was performed on all subjects with ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy at Skåne University Hospital Lund (2002-2013) who had undergone LGE-CMR and 12-lead ECG with strict LBBB pre-ICD implantation. Results: Sixty patients were included; 57% nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and 43% ischemic cardiomyopathy with mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 27.6% ± 11.7. All patients had scar by Selvester scoring. Sixty-two percent had scar by LGE-CMR (n = 37). The Spearman correlation coefficient for LGE-CMR and Selvester score derived scar was r = .35 (p = .007). In scar negative LGE-CMR, there was evidence of scar by Selvester scoring in all patients (range 3%-33%, median 15%). Fourteen patients (23%) had an event during the follow-up period; 11 (18%) deaths and six adequate therapies (10%). There was a moderate trend indicating that presence of scar increased the risk of clinical endpoints in the LGE-CMR analysis (p = .045). Conclusion: There is a modest correlation between LGE-CMR and Selvester scoring verified myocardial scar. CMR based scar burden is correlated to clinical outcome, but Selvester scoring is not. The Selvester scoring algorithm needs to be further refined in order to be clinically relevant and reliable for detailed scar evaluation in patients with LBBB.
|
|
