| 1. |
- Bahadoer, Renu R., et al.
(författare)
-
The survival gap between young and older patients after surgical resection for colorectal cancer remains largely based on early mortality : A EURECCA comparison of four European countries
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geriatric Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 1879-4068 .- 1879-4076. ; 13:6, s. 803-812
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: A decade ago, it was demonstrated that the difference in survival between older patients and younger patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) was mainly due to mortality in the first postoperative year. Over the last few years, improvements - especially in perioperative care - have increased survival. The current research investigates whether a survival gap between younger and older patients with CRC still exists on a national level in four European countries.Methods: Population-based data from Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden were collected from patients that underwent surgical resection for primary stage I-III CRC between 2007 and 2016. Relative survival and conditional relative survival (CS), with the condition of surviving the first postoperative year, were calculated for colon and rectal cancer separately, stratified for country and age category (<65, 65–75, ≥75 years). In addition, relative excess risk of death (RER) was estimated, and one-year excess mortality was calculated.Results: Data of 206,024 patients were analyzed. In general, compared to patients <65 years, patients ≥75 years had a worse survival during the first year after surgery, which was most pronounced in Belgium (RER colon cancer 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3–2.8] and RER rectal cancer 2.6 [95% CI 2.3–2.9]). After surviving the first year, CS was mostly not statistically different between patients <65 years and patients ≥75 years with stage I-II, with the exception of stage II colon cancer in Belgium. However, CS remained worse in the largest part of the patients ≥75 years with stage III colon or rectal cancer (except for rectal cancer in Norway).Conclusions: Although differences exist between the countries, the survival gap between young and older patients is based mainly on early mortality and remains only for stage III disease after surviving the first year.
|
|
| 2. |
- Karakatsanis, Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
The challenge of avoiding over- and under-treatment in older women with ductal cancer in situ : A scoping review of existing knowledge gaps and a meta-analysis of real-world practice patterns
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geriatric Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-4068 .- 1879-4076. ; 11:6, s. 917-925
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) is mainly a screen-detected disease and although the risk for breast cancer is age-dependent, most screening programs do not include women over the age of 75 years. Older women are usually excluded from clinical trials and treatment practices are largely based on observational studies or extrapolation of trial results from younger patients, leading to either over- or under-treatment of this population. We systematically reviewed available electronic databases for DCIS treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients 15 years. Inclusion criteria allowed for randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control and cross-sectional studies, as well as meta-analyses, systematic reviews and position papers. Results showed that, although elderly are not necessarily frail, they are generally treated as such by physicians, aiming to dc-escalate therapeutic interventions. After adjusting for frailty, age seems to be a significant factor for less surgery; however, older women with DCIS are more probable to receive surgery than their counterparts with early invasive cancer. DCIS biology and subtypes are independent risk factors for local recurrence or progression to invasive carcinoma, if DCIS is under-treated. The end-benefit of surgery, radio- and endocrine-therapy depend on additional parameters, such as life expectancy, co-morbidities and competing risks of death. Screen-detected DCIS in older women is a challenging clinical problem, mainly due to the lack of high-level data. Therapeutic strategies should be tailored to life expectancy and performance status, DCIS features and patient preference, aiming at combining optimal ontological outcomes with maintenance of quality of life.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Kotti, Angeliki, et al.
(författare)
-
Survival benefit of statins in older patients with rectal cancer : A Swedish population-based cohort study
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geriatric Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 1879-4068 .- 1879-4076. ; 10:5, s. 690-697
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- ObjectivesIncreasing evidence suggests that statins may have antitumor effects but their rolein rectal cancer appears inconclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate whether statins may have an impact on survival of older and younger patients with rectal cancer.Materials and MethodsThis study included 238 patients ≥70 years and 227 patients <70 years old, from the Southeast Health Care Region of Sweden, who were diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2013.ResultsIn the older group (n = 238), statin use at the time of diagnosis was related to better cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), compared to non-use (CSS: Hazard Ratio (HR), 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19–0.72; P = .003; OS: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39–0.96; P = .032). In the older group with stages I-III disease (n = 199), statin use was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) compared to non use (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06–0.59; P = .005). The improvement of CSS, OS and DFS remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders. In the older group with stage III disease, statin users had better CSS and DFS compared to non-users (log rank P = .043; log-rank P = .028, respectively). In the older group with short course radiotherapy, statin use was related to better CSS (log-rank P = .032). No such association was present in the younger group.ConclusionStatin use was related to improved survival in older patients with rectal cancer.This observation is important given the low cost and safety of statins as a drug.
|
|
| 5. |
- Liposits, Gabor, et al.
(författare)
-
Prognostic value of baseline functional status measures and geriatric screening in vulnerable older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy : The randomized NORDIC9-study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geriatric Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 1879-4068 .- 1879-4076. ; 14:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Appropriate patient selection based on functional status is crucial when considering older adults for palliative chemotherapy. This pre-planned analysis of the randomized NORDIC9-study explored the prognostic value of four functional status measures regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in vulnerable older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy.Materials and methods: Patients >= 70 years of age with mCRC not candidates for standard full-dose combination chemotherapy were randomized to receive full-dose S1 or reduced-dose S1 + oxaliplatin. At baseline, functional status was assessed using ECOG performance status (ECOG PS), frailty phenotype, Geriatric 8 (G8), and Vulnerable Elderly Survey-13 (VES-13). Multivariable regression models were applied and C-statistics were estimated.Results: In total, 160 patients with a median age of 78 years (IQR: 76-81) were included. While in univariate analyses, ECOG PS, frailty phenotype, and VES-13 were statistically significantly associated with differences in OS between subgroups, G8 was not (HR = 1.55, 95%CI: 0.99-2.41, p = 0.050). In multivariable analyses adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and treatment allocation, we found significant differences between subgroups for all applied tools and with C-statistics in the moderate range for ECOG PS and VES-13. Concerning PFS, statistically significant differences were observed between subgroups of ECOG PS, G8, and VES-13 both in uni-and multivariable analyses, but not for frailty phenotype.Discussion: In this Nordic cohort of vulnerable older patients with mCRC, baseline ECOG PS, frailty phenotype, G8, and VES-13 showed prognostic value regarding overall survival, and moderate predictive value of models based on ECOG PS and VES-13 was demonstrated.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Samuelsson, Katja Schubert, et al.
(författare)
-
Preoperative geriatric assessment and follow-up of patients older than 75 years undergoing elective surgery for suspected colorectal cancer
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geriatric Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 1879-4068 .- 1879-4076. ; 10:5, s. 709-715
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: We investigated the predictive value of specific tools used in a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) with regard to postoperative outcome in patients 75 years and older undergoing elective colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Furthermore, recovery was followed over the first postoperative year using the same assessment tools.Material and Methods: Baseline clinical and CGA variables including functional and nutritional status, pressure sore risk, fall risk, cognition, depression, polypharmacy, comorbidity, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) were prospectively recorded. Outcome variables were postoperative complications and length of stay (LOS). Patients were likewise followed up at one, three and twelve months postoperatively.Results: Forty-nine patients underwent surgery (median age 81 years). Forty-three per cent had ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class 2 47% had ASA class 3. Postoperative complications occurred in 32.7%. Median LOS was eight days. In univariate analyses, none of the parameters tested predicted postoperative complication or LOS. During follow-up, all patients recovered to baseline values apart from HRQoL which was still reduced at three and twelve months (p = .017). Nutritional status had improved twelve months after surgery (p = .011).Conclusions: No association could be found in this study between the results of a comprehensive geriatric assessment and prolonged length of stay or postoperative complication rate after elective surgery for colorectal cancer. Patients recovered well during the first year after surgery. Quality of life, however, was still lower than prior to surgery.
|
|
| 8. |
- Valachis, Antonis, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Treatment patterns, risk for hospitalization and mortality in older patients with triple negative breast cancer
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geriatric Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 1879-4068 .- 1879-4076. ; 12:2, s. 212-218
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: To study the treatment patterns, potential risk factors for hospitalization within one year from diagnosis, and causes of death in older patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a registry-based cohort study using the BCBaSe database which links cases of breast cancer from three Swedish healthcare regions with socioeconomic factors, hospitalizations and causes of death. Women ≥70 years old with non-metastatic TNBC, between 1/12007 and 31/122012 were included (n = 413).RESULTS: In total, 168 patients (40.7%) received chemotherapy after surgery and 123 patients (30.0%) in the whole cohort had at least one hospitalization within one year from diagnosis. The risk of hospitalization overall was increased in the group receiving chemotherapy (Odds Ratio 2.35, 95% Confidence Intervall: 1.30-4.26) mainly due to toxicities. Cumulative incidence of breast cancer mortality was comparable among different age groups (70-74 vs. 75-79 vs. ≥ 80 years old) whereas non-breast cancer mortality was higher in patients ≥80 years old. Stage at diagnosis and comorbidities were independently associated with both breast cancer-specific- and overall mortality whereas age was only associated with overall mortality.CONCLUSIONS: The use of chemotherapy in older patients with TNBC was associated with age, tumor stage, and comorbidities. Chemotherapy use was also associated with increased risk for hospitalization within one year from diagnosis. Although the impact of chemotherapy on mortality was analyzed in a multivariate manner showing neither increased or decreased mortality, no firm conclusion can be drawn due to unmeasured confounders.
|
|
| 9. |
- Battisti, N. M. L., et al.
(författare)
-
Adapting care for older cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations from the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) COVID-19 Working Group
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geriatric Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-4068. ; 11:8, s. 1190-1198
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The COVID-19 pandemic poses a barrier to equal and evidence-based management of cancer in older adults. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) formed a panel of experts to develop consensus recommendations on the implications of the pandemic on several aspects of cancer care in this age group including geriatric assessment (GA), surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatment, palliative care and research. Age and cancer diagnosis are significant predictors of adverse outcomes of the COVID-19 infection. In this setting, GA is particularly valuable to drive decision-making. GA may aid estimating physiologic reserve and adaptive capability, assessing risk-benefits of either providing or temporarily withholding treatments, and determining patient preferences to help inform treatment decisions. In a resource-constrained setting, geriatric screening tools may be administered remotely to identify patients requiring comprehensive GA. Tele-health is also crucial to ensure adequate continuity of care and minimize the risk of infection exposure. In general, therapeutic decisions should favor the most effective and least invasive approach with the lowest risk of adverse outcomes. In selected cases, this might require deferring or omitting surgery, radiotherapy or systemic treatments especially where benefits are marginal and alternative safe therapeutic options are available. Ongoing research is necessary to expand knowledge of the management of cancer in older adults. However, the pandemic presents a significant barrier and efforts should be made to ensure equitable access to clinical trials and prospective data collection to elucidate the outcomes of COVID-19 in this population. © 2020 Elsevier Inc.
|
|
| 10. |
- Berg, Malin, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
The effect of age on health-related quality of life for head and neck cancer patients up to 1 year after curative treatment
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geriatric Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-4068. ; 13:1, s. 60-66
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the effect of age on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), treated with curative intent, in the Western healthcare region of Sweden. Materials and Methods: In this prospective observational study, 311 HNC patients completed quality of life questionnaires for cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35) and for older patients with cancer (EORT QLQELD14) at diagnosis and 3, 6, and 12 months after start of treatment. Mean scores for patients >_70 years old were compared to younger patients (50 to 69 years old) to assess differences in HRQOL. Results: Of the 311 study participants, 105 patients were >_70 years old (median age 76.7), of which 32 were >_80 years of age. Most HRQOL scores were equal or better for older adult patients at 3 months after treatment, but physical function was better for younger adult patients up to 12 months after treatment. At 6 months the HRQOL was similar (older patients had less appetite loss and financial difficulties), while the oldest patients (>_80 years) had worse fatigue, role function, and feeling ill at 12 months. For the EORTC-ELD-14 questionnaire, older patients scored better for worries at diagnosis and reported more difficulties in maintaining purpose at 12 months after treatment. Conclusion: When curative treatment is administered, older adult patients with HNC have similar or even better HRQOL compared to younger adult patients, except for physical function, during the first year. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
