| 1. |
- Alobaidy, Abdulqadir, et al.
(författare)
-
Grooved vs smooth ureteric stent before extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy : Single-blind randomised clinical trial
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Arab Journal of Urology. - : Taylor & Francis Group. - 2090-598X .- 2090-5998. ; 20:1, s. 41-48
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: No study compared the grooved stent to the widely used standard smooth (nongrooved) stent in humans. We compared stone clearance, complications, and patient tolerance of the grooved stent vs standard JJ stent. Patients and Methods: Single-blinded randomised trial among patients planned for pre-extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) stenting. Adult patients with unilateral ureteric/ renal stones planned for ESWL were randomly assigned to receive (Percuflex) smooth ureteric stent or (Visiostar) grooved lithotripsy stent and blinded to the stent type. We collected and compared the baseline data and outcomes (stone-free rate, complications, and stent-related symptoms) of both patient groups. Results: A total of 96 adults were included (48 per arm). There were no significant differences between the groups at baseline in terms of demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, renal function, number of ESWL sessions, and stone characteristics, including pre-ESWL stone volume (mean [SD] smooth 310.2 [301.6] vs grooved 270.7 [278.6] mm3, P = 0.5). Stone clearance was statistically insignificant between the groups, although clinically relevant (smooth stent 70.8% vs grooved stent 81.2%, P = 0.2). Grooved-stent patients reported comparable urinary symptoms score (P = 0.05) and operative complications (P = 0.6), but significantly more urinary tract infections (UTIs) not requiring hospitalisation (P = 0.003). Conclusions: Although statistically insignificant, the grooved stent exhibited higher stone clearance compared to the smooth stent, with similar complication rates excpet that patients with grooved stents reported more UTIs. A re-visit to the size of the outer diameter of the grooved stent could enhance its stone clearance properties, and further development of its coating material could lead to better patient satisfaction.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Elbardisi, Haitham, et al.
(författare)
-
Geographical differences in semen characteristics of 13 892 infertile men
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Arab Journal of Urology. - : Arab Association of Urology. - 2090-598X. ; 16:1, s. 3-9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To assess the relationship between geographical differences and all semen parameters, across 13,892 infertile men of 84 diverse nationalities, recruited at a specialised tertiary hospital that represents the main healthcare provider in Qatar. Male infertility is an important and global public health problem. Despite this, there is a significant scarcity of epidemiological male infertility and semen analysis research in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, as well as geographical comparisons with other parts of the world. Patients and methods: Retrospective study of semen findings of 13 892 infertile men assessed at the Male Infertility Unit at Hamad Medical Corporation, in Qatar between January 2012 and August 2015. Based on country of origin, patients were categorised into those from the MENA region (n = 8799) and non-MENA patients (n = 5093). The two groups were compared across demographic features and semen characteristics: age, sperm volume, sperm total motility, sperm progressive motility (PMot), abnormal sperm forms (ABF), and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF). Results: The whole sample's mean (SD) age was 35.7 (0.7) years, sperm concentration was 32.3 (0.25) × 106 sperm/mL, total motility was 45.4 (0.2)%, sperm PMot was 25.1 (0.2)%, and ABF was 79.9 (0.2)%. Overall, 841 patients had azoospermia (6.05%), 3231 had oligospermia (23.3%), 4239 had asthenospermia (30.5%) and 6772 had teratospermia (48.7%). SDF (1050 patients) was abnormal in 333 patients (31.7%). MENA patients were significantly younger than their non-MENA counterparts and had a greater semen volume. Non-MENA patients had significantly higher sperm counts, total motility and PMot, and lower ABF. SDF showed no statistical difference between the two groups. MENA patients had significantly higher prevalence of oligospermia, asthenospermia, and teratospermia; and lower prevalence of normal sperm concentration, normal motility, and normal morphology. Throughout the 4 years of the study, MENA patients constantly had significantly lower sperm counts; generally lower sperm total motility percentage and generally lower quality sperm morphology. We compared patients by age (≤40 and >40 years): in the patients aged ≤40 years, the same results as for the overall study were reproduced; in the >40-years group, the same results were reproduced with the exception of morphology, which was not significantly different between the MENA and non-MENA patients. Conclusion: Semen quality is generally lower in male infertility patients from the MENA region compared to non-MENA regions. © 2018 Arab Association of Urology
|
|
| 4. |
- Majzoub, Ahmad, et al.
(författare)
-
Oxidation–reduction potential and sperm DNA fragmentation, and their associations with sperm morphological anomalies amongst fertile and infertile men
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Arab Journal of Urology. - : Arab Association of Urology. - 2090-598X. ; 16:1, s. 87-95
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To assess seminal oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) and sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in male infertility and their relationships with sperm morphology in fertile and infertile men. Patients and methods: Prospective case-control study comparing the findings of infertile men (n = 1168) to those of men with confirmed fertility (n = 100) regarding demographics and semen characteristics (conventional and advanced semen tests). Spearman rank correlation assessed the correlation between ORP, SDF, and different morphological indices. Means of ORP and SDF were assessed in variable levels of normal sperm morphology amongst all participants. Results: Infertile patients had a significantly lower mean sperm count (32.7 vs 58.7 × 106 sperm/mL), total motility (50.1% vs 60.4%), and normal morphology (5.7% vs 9.9%). Conversely, infertile patients had significantly higher mean head defects (54% vs 48%), and higher ORP and SDF values than fertile controls. ORP and SDF showed significant positive correlations and significant negative correlations with sperm head defects and normal morphology in infertile patients, respectively. ORP and SDF were significantly inversely associated with the level of normal sperm morphology. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, ORP and SDF threshold values of 1.73 mV/106 sperm/mL and 25.5%, respectively, were associated with 76% and 56% sensitivity and 72% and 72.2% specificity, respectively, in differentiating <4% from ≥4% normal morphology. Conclusion: A direct inverse relationship exists between seminal ORP and SDF with various levels of normal sperm morphology. Using ORP and SDF measures in conjunction with standard semen morphology analysis could validate the result of the fertility status of patients. © 2017 Arab Association of Urology
|
|
