| 1. |
- Baldvinsdóttir, Bryndís, et al.
(författare)
-
Adverse events during endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms : A prospective nationwide study on subarachnoid hemorrhage in Sweden
- 2023
-
Ingår i: BRAIN AND SPINE. - : Elsevier. - 2772-5294. ; 3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: A range of adverse events (AEs) may occur in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Endovascular treatment is commonly used to prevent aneurysm re-rupture.Research question: The aim of this study was to identify AEs related to endovascular treatment, analyze risk factors for AEs and how AEs affect patient outcome.Material and methods: Patients with aneurysmal SAH admitted to all neurosurgical centers in Sweden during a 3.5-year period (2014-2018) were prospectively registered. AEs related to endovascular aneurysm treatment were thromboembolic events, aneurysm re-rupture, vessel dissection and puncture site hematoma. Potential risk factors for the AEs were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Functional outcome was assessed at one year using the extended Glasgow outcome scale.Results: In total, 1037 patients were treated for ruptured aneurysms. Of which, 715 patients were treated with endovascular occlusion. There were 115 AEs reported in 113 patients (16%). Thromboembolic events were noted in 78 patients (11%). Aneurysm re-rupture occurred in 28 (4%), vessel dissection in 4 (0.6%) and puncture site hematoma in 5 (0.7%). Blister type aneurysm, aneurysm smaller than 5 mm and endovascular techniques other than coiling were risk factors for treatment-related AEs. At follow-up, 230 (32%) of the patients had unfavorable outcome. Patients suffering intraprocedural aneurysm re-rupture were more likely to have unfavorable outcome (OR 6.9, 95% CI 2.3-20.9).Discussion and conclusion: Adverse events related to endovascular occlusion of a ruptured aneurysm were seen in 16% of patients. Aneurysm re-rupture during endovascular treatment was associated with increased risk of unfavorable functional outcome.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bobinski, Lukas, et al.
(författare)
-
Lateral interbody fusion without intraoperative neuromonitoring in addition to posterior instrumented fusion in geriatric patients : A single center consecutive series of 108 surgeries
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Brain and Spine. - : Elsevier. - 2772-5294. ; 3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and lateral thoracic interbody fusion (LTIF), supported by intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), gained popularity as a mini-invasive alternatives for standard interbody fusion. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome in a large elderly patient cohort who underwent LTIF/LLIF without IONM.Methods: This retrospective, single-center study enrolled elderly patients (≥70 years old) operated during the period from 2010 to 2016. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the L5/S1 segment was excluded from the analysis.Results: The study enrolled 108 patients (63 males, 58.3%) with a mean age of 76.5 y/o. The mean follow-up was 14.4 ± 11.3 months. The mean time of the surgery was 92 ± 34.2 min. The mean blood loss was 62.2 ml. There were no vascular or visceral surgical complications. 39 medical complications were encountered in 24 (22%) patients. Less than 5% of patients presented with a new onset of motor weakness and less than 2% of the patients developed a new sensory deficit at the discharge. 46% of patients were lost in follow-up at 12 months.Conclusions: IONM is not mandatory for LLIF/LTIF surgery in geriatric patients and has a low frequency of approach-related complications as well as neurological deterioration. Our results are comparable to the available literature. Regardless of the utilization of these mini-invasive, anterior approaches, in patients of advanced aged, the risk for major medical complications is high and is responsible for contributing to prolonged hospitalization.
|
|
| 3. |
- Carrwik, Christian, et al.
(författare)
-
Predicting survival of patients with spinal metastatic disease using PathFx 3.0 – A validation study of 668 patients in Sweden
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Brain and Spine. - : Elsevier BV. - 2772-5294. ; 2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction PathFx is a computer-based prediction model for estimating survival of patients with bone metastasis. The model has been validated in several studies, but this is the first validation using exclusively patients with spinal metastases. Research question Is PathFx 3.0 a tool useful for predicting survival for patients with spinal metastatic disease? Material and methods 668 patients (67% male, median age 67 years) presenting with spinal metastases at two university hospitals in Sweden 1991–2014 were included. Of those, the majority (82%, n=551) underwent surgery. Data on all patients was analyzed with PathFx version 3.0, generating a probability of survival at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. The predictions were compared to real survival data and the precision in estimation was evaluated with Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) analysis where the Area Under Curve (AUC) was calculated. Brier score and decision curve analyses were also assessed. Results The AUC for 1-, 3-, 6- and 12 months survival predictions were 0.64 (95% CI 0.5–0.71), 0.71 (95% CI 0.67–0.75), 0.70 (95% CI 0.66–0.77) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.70–0.78). For 18- and 24 months survival the AUC were 0.74 (95% CI 0.69–0.78) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.72–0.81). The Brier scores were all 0.23 or lower depending on the estimated survival time. Discussion and conclusion PathFx 3.0 is a reasonably reliable tool for predicting survival in patients with spinal metastatic disease. As the PathFx computer model can be updated to reflect advancements in oncology, we suggest this type of model, rather than rigid point-based scoring systems, to be used for estimating survival in patients with metastatic spinal disease in the future.
|
|
| 4. |
- Demetriades, Andreas K., et al.
(författare)
-
Sport-related concussion in soccer –a scoping review of available guidelines and a call for action to FIFA & soccer governing bodies
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Brain and Spine. - 2772-5294. ; 4
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Sport-related concussions (SRC) have been a concern in all sports, including soccer. The long-term effects of soccer-related head injuries are a public health concern. The Concussion in Sport Group (CISG) released a consensus statement in 2017 and several soccer governing associations have published their own SRC guidelines while referring to it but it is unclear whether this has been universally adopted. Research question: We aimed to investigate whether guidelines published by soccer associations have any discrepancies; and the extent to which they follow the CISG recommendations. Materials and methods: A scoping review of available soccer-specific SRC guidelines was performed via databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and official soccer association websites via web browser Google. The inclusion criteria were soccer-specific SRC guidelines. Comparisons between guidelines were made concerning the following index items: initial (on-site) assessment, removal from play, re-evaluation with neuroimaging, return-to-sport protocol, special populations, and education. Results: Nine soccer associations with available guidelines were included in this review. Guidelines obtained were from official associations in the United Kingdom, United States of America, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. When compared to each other and the CISG recommendations, discrepancies were found within guidelines regarding the index items. Additionally, major soccer associations in some countries famous for soccer were found to have not published any publicly available guidelines. Discussion and conclusion: SRC guidelines from different soccer associations contain discrepancies which may be detrimental to athletes, both short and long-term. We recommend that all major soccer governing associations publish guidelines that are standardised and accessible to all athletes.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Gousias, K, et al.
(författare)
-
Expertise in surgical neuro-oncology. Results of a survey by the EANS neuro-oncology section.
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Brain & spine. - 2772-5294. ; 4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Technical advances and the increasing role of interdisciplinary decision-making may warrant formal definitions of expertise in surgical neuro-oncology.The EANS Neuro-oncology Section felt that a survey detailing the European neurosurgical perspective on the concept of expertise in surgical neuro-oncology might be helpful.The EANS Neuro-oncology Section panel developed an online survey asking questions regarding criteria for expertise in neuro-oncological surgery and sent it to all individual EANS members.Our questionnaire was completed by 251 respondents (consultants: 80.1%) from 42 countries. 67.7% would accept a lifetime caseload of >200 cases and 86.7% an annual caseload of >50 as evidence of neuro-oncological surgical expertise. A majority felt that surgeons who do not treat children (56.2%), do not have experience with spinal fusion (78.1%) or peripheral nerve tumors (71.7%) may still be considered experts. Majorities believed that expertise requires the use of skull-base approaches (85.8%), intraoperative monitoring (83.4%), awake craniotomies (77.3%), and neuro-endoscopy (75.5%) as well as continuing education of at least 1/year (100.0%), a research background (80.0%) and teaching activities (78.7%), and formal interdisciplinary collaborations (e.g., tumor board: 93.0%). Academic vs. non-academic affiliation, career position, years of neurosurgical experience, country of practice, and primary clinical interest had a minor influence on the respondents' opinions.Opinions among neurosurgeons regarding the characteristics and features of expertise in neuro-oncology vary surprisingly little. Large majorities favoring certain thresholds and qualitative criteria suggest a consensus definition might be possible.
|
|
| 7. |
- Herdell, V., et al.
(författare)
-
Surgical outcomes of pediatric brain tumors in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Brain and Spine. - : Elsevier BV. - 2772-5294. ; 2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Pediatric Brain Tumors (PBT) are a common cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Contrary to high-income countries (HIC), survival rates in low-and-middle income countries (LMIC) remains low despite advances in neurosurgical care and diagnostics over the past decades. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the surgical outcomes for PBT in Sub-Saharan Africa, and the distribution of PBT types.Methods: A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, for all available literature on the surgical outcomes of PBT in Sub-Saharan Africa, published before May 3, 2022. Two reviewers performed abstract, full text screening and data collection independently, resolving any conflicts by consensus.Results: The search yielded 256 studies, of which 22 met the inclusion criteria, amounting to a total of 243 pa-tients. Nigeria was the country with most data. Only subgroups of patients could be extracted from 12 studies, and variables of interest in 6 studies had inconsistent sample sizes. The age centered around 9 years, and there were approximately equal number of girls and boys. The most common tumor was medulloblastoma, followed by craniopharyngioma and astrocytoma. There was large heterogeneity in the reporting of outcomes, and a trend was difficult to discern, considering the large number of different tumor types and different extents of resection.Discussion and conclusion: Data is insufficient and inconsistent, precluding statistical conclusions. There is a need for more studies in the field.
|
|
| 8. |
- Hossain, Iftakher, et al.
(författare)
-
Blood biomarkers for traumatic brain injury : A narrative review of current evidence
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Brain and Spine. - : Elsevier. - 2772-5294. ; 4
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: A blood-based biomarker (BBBM) test could help to better stratify patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), reduce unnecessary imaging, to detect and treat secondary insults, predict outcomes, and monitor treatment effects and quality of care.Research question: What evidence is available for clinical applications of BBBMs in TBI and how to advance this field?Material and methods: This narrative review discusses the potential clinical applications of core BBBMs in TBI. A literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge focused on articles in English with the words "traumatic brain injury" together with the words "blood biomarkers", "diagnostics", "outcome prediction", "extracranial injury" and "assay method" alone-, or in combination.Results: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) combined with Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1(UCH-L1) has received FDA clearance to aid computed tomography (CT)-detection of brain lesions in mild (m) TBI. Application of S100B led to reduction of head CT scans. GFAP may also predict magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities in CT-negative cases of TBI. Further, UCH-L1, S100B, Neurofilament light (NF-L), and total tau showed value for predicting mortality or unfavourable outcome. Nevertheless, biomarkers have less role in outcome prediction in mTBI. S100B could serve as a tool in the multimodality monitoring of patients in the neurointensive care unit.Discussion and conclusion: Largescale systematic studies are required to explore the kinetics of BBBMs and their use in multiple clinical groups. Assay development/cross validation should advance the generalizability of those results which implicated GFAP, S100B and NF-L as most promising biomarkers in the diagnostics of TBI.
|
|
| 9. |
- Hossain, Iftakher, et al.
(författare)
-
Huge variability in restrictions of mobilization for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage - A European survey of practice
- 2023
-
Ingår i: BRAIN AND SPINE. - : Elsevier. - 2772-5294. ; 3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: One of the major goals of neurointensive care is to prevent secondary injuries following aSAH. Bed rest and patient immobilization are practiced in order to decrease the risk of DCI.Research question: To explore the current practices in place concerning the management of patients with aSAH, specifically, protocols and habits regarding restrictions of mobilization and HOB positioning.Material and methods: A survey was designed, modified, and approved by the panel of the Trauma & Critical Care section of the EANS to cover the practice of restrictions of patient mobilization and HOB positioning in patients with aSAH.Results: Twenty-nine physicians from 17 countries completed the questionnaire. The majority (79.3%) stated that non-secured aneurysm and the presence of an EVD were the factors related to the establishment of restriction of mobilization. The average duration of the restriction varied widely ranging between 1 and 21 days. The presence of an EVD (13.8%) was found to be the main reason to recommend restriction of HOB elevation. The average duration of restriction of HOB positioning ranged between 3 and 14 days. Rebleeding or complications related to CSF over-drainage were found to be related to these restrictions.Discussion and conclusion: Restriction of patient mobilization regimens vary widely in Europe. Current limited evidence does not support an increased risk of DCI rather the early mobilization might be beneficial. Large prospective studies and/or the initiative of a RCT are needed to understand the significance of early mobilization on the outcome of patients with aSAH.
|
|
| 10. |
- Iaccarino, Corrado, et al.
(författare)
-
Consensus-based recommendations for diagnosis and surgical management of cranioplasty and post-traumatic hydrocephalus from a European panel
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Brain & spine. - : Elsevier. - 2772-5294. ; 4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Planning cranioplasty (CPL) in patients with suspected or proven post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) poses a significant management challenge due to a lack of clear guidance.RESEARCH QUESTION: This project aims to create a European document to improve adherence and adapt to local protocols based on available resources and national health systems.METHODS: After a thorough non-systematic review, a steering committee (SC) formed a European expert panel (EP) for a two-round questionnaire using the Delphi method. The questionnaire employed a 9-point Likert scale to assess the appropriateness of statements inherent to two sections: "Diagnostic criteria for PTH" and "Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction."RESULTS: The panel reached a consensus on 29 statements. In the "Diagnostic criteria for PTH" section, five statements were deemed "appropriate" (consensus 74.2-90.3 %), two were labeled "inappropriate," and seven were marked as "uncertain."In the "Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction" section, four statements were considered "appropriate" (consensus 74.2-90.4 %), six were "inappropriate," and five were "uncertain."DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Planning a cranioplasty alongside hydrocephalus remains a significant challenge in neurosurgery. Our consensus conference suggests that, in patients with cranial decompression and suspected hydrocephalus, the most suitable diagnostic approach involves a combination of evolving clinical conditions and neuroradiological imaging. The recommended management sequence prioritizes cranial reconstruction, with the option of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt when needed, preferably with a programmable valve. We strongly recommend to adopt local protocols based on expert consensus, such as this, to guide patient care.
|
|
