| 1. |
- Liljeroos, Maria
(författare)
-
Caring needs in patient-partner dyads affected by heart failure : An evaluation of the long-term effects of a dyadic psycho-educational intervention
- 2017
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Introduction: As medical treatment has improved, patients with heart failure (HF) now live longer and care mostly takes place at home with partners providing the main assistance. Taking care of an ill or disabled individual imposes a well-documented burden on the partner’s healthrelated quality of life. The awareness of partners’ burdensome situation is increasing, but few interventions have targeted the needs of patientpartner dyads with HF. The results have been inconclusive and give no clear guidance on how interventional programmes should be designed to improve both patient and partner outcomes.Aim: The overall aim of this thesis was to evaluate the effects of a psychoeducational intervention delivered to patient-partner dyads with HF during long-term follow-up, and to explore the dyads’ perceived caring needs.Methods: The thesis is based on four papers that used both quantitative and qualitative data. Study I and II used a randomized controlled design with a follow-up assessment after 24 months including 155 patientpartner dyads. The control group received care as usual. The intervention group received care as usual, and in addition they participated in the nurse-led psycho-educational intervention. Data was collected using questionnaires before and 24 months after the intervention, in order to determine the long-term effects on patients and partners regarding health related quality of life, perceived control, symptoms of depression and partners’ caregiver burden (I, II). A conceptual health promotion model inspired the intervention. To describe how the model was applied, a qualitative approach analysing nurses’ documentation of the sessions with 71 dyads in the intervention group (III) was used. Study IV has an explorative design. To further explore the dyads’ perceived caring needs, focus groups interviews with 19 patient-partner dyads with heart failure (IV) were performed.Results: The intervention did not have any significant effect on physical or mental health- related quality of life, depressive symptoms, or perceived control over the heart failure among the dyads (I) or caregiver burden in the partners (II) after 24 months. Furthermore, time to first event did not differ significantly between the dyads in the intervention group and the control group (I, II). As for the partners, both the intervention and control group reported decreased physical health between the baseline assessment and the 24-month follow-up (I). The intervention was composed of three components; 1) cognitive 2) supportive, and 3) behavioural component. The analysis of the nurses’ documentation confirmed the coverage of all the components and the analysis revealed a vide range of caring needs among the dyads (III). The dyads described a need to learn about HF to be able to manage everyday life. Regular outpatient clinic visits and access to telephone support were vital and both the patient and the partner need to be present at the clinic visits. Meeting others who are in the same situation and sharing the burden in nurse-led group sessions was proposed as an opportunity to support each other and others (IV).Conclusions: Over the 24-month follow-up period, the intervention had a neutral effect on health- related quality of life, depressive symptoms and perceived control over the HF among the dyads, and on partners’ caregiver burden. Considering the fact that partners serve as a critical extension of the formal healthcare system, and that both patients and partners ask for more support, it will become crucial to find new ways to support dyads affected by heart failure. This thesis may be viewed as a first step in trying to understand dyads’ perceived caring needs, and it can serve as a guide in clinical work and when designing new dyadic interventions.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ågren, Susanna, 1964-
(författare)
-
Supportive care for patients with heart failure and their partners : A descriptive and interventional study
- 2010
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Having the support of a partner is essential for both health related quality of life and survival in heart failure patients. However, caring for a patient with heart failure may affect the health related quality of life, well‐being and cause a burden for the partner. The partner is expected to be responsible for the care, which may have consequences for the heart failure patient’s long‐term health and well‐being. Further research to determine health related quality of life, well‐being, caregiver burden and needs of partners is warranted as well as studies evaluating interventions targeting patient‐partner dyads.Aim: The overall aim was to describe how the life situation of patient‐partner dyads was influenced by heart failure and to determine the effects of an intervention of follow‐up with education and psychosocial support for patient‐partner dyads.Design and methods: The thesis is based on three quantitative studies and one qualitative study. The first two studies were descriptive and included 135 dyads (patient‐partner) (I, II) and the randomised intervention study included a total of 155 dyads (IV). The qualitative study had a grounded theory approach. Thirteen partners were interviewed and data analysed using constant comparative method (III).Results: Caregiver burden was perceived as moderate in 30% of the partners and the rest experienced a low caregiver burden. The patients’ physical component score of SF‐36, partners’ mental component score of SF‐36 and perceived control explained 39% of the caregiver burden (I). Patients had lower health related quality of life compared to their partners in all dimensions except in the mental health domain of SF‐36 and lower qualityadjusted life year weights compared to their partners. Mental health scores were lower in partners compared to age and gender‐matched references. All other health related quality of life scores and the quality‐adjusted life year weights were comparable between the partners and the reference group. Patients had more depressive symptoms than their partners. There was no difference in the level of perceived control or knowledge about chronic heart failure between patients and partners (II). During grounded theory analysis confirmation was identified as describing the core category of the partners’ individual needs. The core category theoretically binds together three underlying subcategories: security, rest for mind and body, and inner strength. Confirmation facilitated acceptance and improvement of mental and physical health among partners (III). At the three month follow‐up the dyad‐intervention had improved perceived control in patients, but not in the partners. There were no other significant differences in the control and intervention group with regard to the dyads’ health related quality of life and symptoms of depression. There were also no differences in the patients’ self‐care behaviour and partners’ experiences of caregiver burden (IV).Conclusions and implications: Partners to patients with chronic heart failure are at risk of decreased mental well‐being. One third of the partners experienced a moderate caregiver burden and was therefore at a higher risk of poor mental health and decreased perceived control. During short‐term follow‐up the intervention with education and psychosocial support to dyads (patient‐partner) improved the level of perceived control in the chronic heart failure patient group. By identifying partnersʹ needs for security, rest for mind and body, and inner strength, healthcare professionals can confirm these needs throughout the caring process, from the critical care period and throughout rehabilitation at home. Interventions targeting dyads have been limited in previous research. Partners need to be prepared regarding the disease process, the daily regimen, hopes for the future and responsible care providers. They also need to be confirmed because they are vital to the patients’ recovery. Further, the effects of the intervention study should also include a long‐term follow‐up as well as an evaluation of the health‐economic perspective including direct and indirect costs of care.
|
|
