| 1. |
- Bartels, Stefan, et al.
(author)
-
Total Hip Arthroplasty Leads to Better Results After Low-Energy Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged 55 to 70 Years : A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial Comparing Internal Fixation and Total Hip Arthroplasty
- 2022
-
In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. - 0021-9355. ; 104:15, s. 1341-1351
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background:The optimal treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 55 to 70 years old remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws (IF) compared with total hip arthroplasty (THA) on hip pain and function, with use of data for outcome measures, complications, and reoperations.Methods:This multicenter randomized controlled trial included all patients 55 to 70 years old who presented with a low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture between December 2013 and December 2018. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo either IF or THA. The primary outcome was the Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the HHS at 4 and 24 months postoperatively, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L [EuroQol 5 Dimensions 3 Levels] index score and EQ-VAS [visual analogue scale]), VAS for pain, and VAS for patient satisfaction at 4, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Complications and reoperations were continuously monitored. The primary analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.Results:A total of 102 patients with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 63.7 ± 4.2 years were allocated to IF (n = 51) or THA (n = 51). The mean difference in the primary outcome, the HHS at 12 months postoperatively (5.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9 to 9.7; p = 0.017), was below the predefined minimal clinically important difference of 10 points. However, patients who underwent THA had a significantly higher HHS at 4 and 12 months, better OHS at 4 and 12 months, and better HOOS at 4, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients who underwent THA also reported better health-related quality of life at 4 months postoperatively and reported greater satisfaction and less pain at 4 and 12 months postoperatively. A total of 26 patients in the IF group (51%; 95% confidence interval, 37% to 65%) and 2 patients in the THA group (4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.5% to 13%) underwent a major reoperation.Conclusions:In this randomized controlled trial, we showed that patients between 55 and 70 years old who underwent THA for a low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture experienced better outcomes than those who underwent closed reduction and internal fixation.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Gronseth, Torstein, et al.
(author)
-
Lugol's solution and Gentian violet eradicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in skin wound infections
- 2023
-
In: International Wound Journal. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1742-4801 .- 1742-481X. ; 20:1, s. 120-130
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of Lugol's solution 5% and Gentian violet 1% against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilm in vivo. The bactericidal efficacy for treatment of MRSA-biofilm skin wound infection was tested in a murine model. Luciferase-tagged S. aureus Xen31, a MRSA-strain derived from S. aureus ATCC-3359130, was used for infection. Wounds were made in the skin of mice and infected with MRSA. The mice were treated with Lugol's solution and Gentian violet. Application of the antimicrobial agents started 24 hours post infection and was repeated daily for five-days. The antimicrobial effect on the biofilm bacteria was evaluated by measuring bioluminescence from MRSA daily for seven-days. Lugol's solution and Gentian violet showed a significant reduction in luminescent signals from the first assessment day to all subsequent days (P < .001). Lugol's solution and Gentian violet effectively eradicated MRSA in biofilm in vivo and could be alternatives or in addition to topical antibiotics when MRSA-biofilm wound infection is suspected.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Vossius, Corinna, et al.
(author)
-
The use of direct care in nursing home residents : A longitudinal cohort study over 3 years
- 2019
-
In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. - : Wiley. - 0885-6230 .- 1099-1166. ; 34:2, s. 337-351
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objectives: To evaluate the trend in the use of direct care in a cohort of nursing home (NH) residents and explore its association with resident characteristics and organizational factors.Methods/design: A total of 696 NH residents from 47 Norwegian NHs were included at admissions at NH. In 537 residents, the use of direct care was assessed every 6 months over a course of 3 years. A multiple model was estimated to identify demographic, clinical, and organizational characteristics associated with the use of direct care time.Results: Six months after admission, on average, 76.2 hours of direct care were rendered to each resident per month, while this number was reduced to 50.3 hours per month at the end of the study period. Most residents (92%) showed a stable use of direct care time, while a small group of residents displayed a much higher and varying use of direct care time. Increasing dementia, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and decreasing function in activities of daily living were associated with higher use of direct care time. Direct care time constituted about 50% of the staff's working time.Conclusion: In Norwegian NHs, high use of direct care time was associated with younger age, more severe dementia, and severe neuropsychiatric symptoms. By identifying factors that impact on direct care time, preventive measures might be put in place to the benefit of the residents and possibly to improve resource use. Further research should explore the association between direct care time, quality of care, and the residents' quality of life.
|
|
