| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Leong, C, et al.
(författare)
-
Psychotropic Medication Use Before and During COVID-19: A Population-Wide Study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in pharmacology. - : Frontiers Media SA. - 1663-9812. ; 13, s. 886652-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and public health measures that took place have led to concerns regarding mental health and receipt of psychotropic medications. We aimed to study the changes in psychotropic medication dispensation rates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the general population.Methods: Administrative health data from the Canadian province of Manitoba was used to describe the quarterly incidence and prevalence of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and anxiolytic/sedative-hypnotics from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. Individuals who received at least one prescription within each quarter were considered exposed to the medication. The denominator was the total population within each quarter. Incidence was defined as no receipt of medication in the 3 years prior to the quarter of interest. Autoregression models for time series data plus indicator variables were used to compare each quarter of 2020 after public health measures were implemented in March 2020 in relation to the expected trend. Analyses were stratified by age and sex.Results: There were 1,394,885 individuals in the first quarter of 2020, with a mean (SD) age of 38.9 (23.4) years, 50.3% were female, and 36.1% had a psychiatric diagnosis in the previous 5 years. A significant decrease was observed for incident antidepressant use (p < 0.05 for both sexes and all age groups except for those 65 years and older) and anxiolytic use (p < 0.05 for both sexes and all age groups except 80 years and older) in the second quarter (April-June) of 2020 compared to the expected trend. Females and those aged 40 years and older had a significantly higher incidence of antidepressant and antipsychotic use in the final quarter of 2020 compared to the expected trend (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Our findings indicate a decrease in new prescriptions for antidepressants and anxiolytics in the 3 months after COVID-19 in-person restrictions were first implemented. We then observed an increase in the new use of antidepressants and antipsychotics at the end of 2020, in females and people aged 40 years and older, with the highest rates of use in the population 80 years and older.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Aboulatta, L, et al.
(författare)
-
Preterm birth and stillbirth rates associated with socioeconomic disparities during COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based cross-sectional study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: BMJ paediatrics open. - : BMJ. - 2399-9772. ; 7:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Conflicting evidence exists on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on preterm birth (PTB) and stillbirth rates. We aimed to evaluate changes in PTB and stillbirth rates before and during the pandemic period and assess the potential effect modification of socioeconomic status (SES).MethodsUsing the linked administrative health databases from Manitoba, Canada, we conducted a cross-sectional study among all pregnant women, comparing 3.5 years pre-pandemic (1 October 2016 to 29 February 2020) to the first year of the pandemic (1 March 2020 to 31 March 2021). We used generalised linear models to assess the quarterly rates of PTB (<37 weeks) and stillbirths. We calculated the predicted trends based on pre-pandemic period data. Finally, we evaluated the PTB and stillbirth rates among lower and higher SES pregnant women (average annual household income) using subgroup analysis and interaction models.ResultsWe examined 70 931 pregnancies in Manitoba during the study period. The risk of PTB increased by 7.7% (95%CI 1.01 to 1.13) and stillbirths by 33% (95% CI 1.08 to 1.64) during the pandemic period. Following COVID-19 restrictions implemented in March 2020, there were increases in the quarterly rates of both PTB (immediate increase (β2)=1.37; p=0.0247) and stillbirths (immediate increase (β2)=0.12; p=0.4434). Among the lower income groups, the pandemic restrictions resulted in an immediate relative increase in PTB and stillbirth rates by 20.12% (immediate increase (β2)=3.17; p=0.0057) and 27.19% (immediate increase (β2)=0.48; p=0.0852). However, over the pandemic, the overall PTB rate significantly decreased as a rebound effect by 0.85% per quarter (p=0.0004), whereas the overall stillbirth rate did not decrease significantly (slope decrease (β3) =−0.01; p=0.8296) compared with the pre-pandemic period. The quarterly rates during the pandemic among the higher income group decreased by 0.39% (p=0.1296) for PTB and increased by 0.07% (p=0.1565) for stillbirth. We observed an effect modification by SES for PTB rates (p=0.047).ConclusionWhile the onset of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions was not associated with significant effects on stillbirth rates, we observed an immediate and rebound effect on PTB rates. The impact of COVID-19 on preterm birth was dependent on SES, with higher influence on families with lower SES. Further studies are needed to detect future trend changes during pandemic waves after 2021 and assess potential underlying mechanisms.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Shouman, W, et al.
(författare)
-
Trends of Utilization of Antiseizure Medications Among Pregnant Women in Manitoba, Canada: A 20-Year Population-Based Study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in pharmacology. - : Frontiers Media SA. - 1663-9812. ; 13, s. 871136-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Evidence from developed countries demonstrates that the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) has been increasing in the last decade. Pregnant women have a very challenging risk benefit trade-off in terms of ASM utilization, and it is crucial to know if increased utilization is seen among pregnant women.Objective: To examine time-trends of utilization of ASM therapies among pregnant women in Manitoba, Canada.Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using de-identified, linked administrative databases from Manitoba. Pregnancies between 1995 and 2018 were included. Four groups of pregnant people were created based on ASM exposure and epilepsy diagnosis.Results: Of 273,492 pregnancies, 812 (3/1000) had epilepsy diagnosis and were exposed to ASMs, 963 (3.5/1000) had epilepsy diagnosis and were unexposed, and 2742 (10/1000) were exposed to ASMs and did not have epilepsy diagnosis. Overall, the number of pregnancies exposed to ASMs increased significantly from 0.56% in 1997 to 2.21% in 2018 (p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis by epilepsy diagnosis showed no significant change in ASMs exposure among pregnant women with epilepsy [the proportion of women exposed to ASM from all pregnancies was 0.37% (in 1997) and 0.36% (in 2018), p = 0.24]. A drop in carbamazepine use was observed, while the number of lamotrigine prescriptions increased from 6.45% in 1997 to 52% by 2018. ASM use among pregnant women without epilepsy increased significantly from 0.19% in 1997 to 1.85% in 2018 (p < 0.0001). In the total cohort of pregnancies, 1439 (0.53%) were exposed during their entire pregnancy, and 1369 (0.5%) were exposed only in their first trimester. Clonazepam was the most used ASM during the study period (1953 users, 0.71%), followed by gabapentin (785 users, 0.29%) and carbamazepine (449 users, 0.16%).Conclusion: No major shifts in the quantity of ASM use over the study period were observed among pregnant women with epilepsy. However, there was a significant increase in ASM use among pregnant women without epilepsy. The study results warrant further investigation into the implications of ASM use in pregnancy for indications other than epilepsy.
|
|
