| 1. |
- Balci, Deniz, et al.
(author)
-
Revival of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: An international multicenter study with promising outcomes
- 2023
-
In: Surgery. - : MOSBY-ELSEVIER. - 0039-6060 .- 1532-7361. ; 173:6, s. 1398-1404
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for per-ihilar cholangiocarcinoma has been considered to be contraindicated due to the initial poor results. Given the recent reports of improved outcomes, we aimed to collect the recent expe-riences of different centers performing associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma to analyze factors related to improved outcomes. Methods: This proof-of-concept study collected contemporary cases of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and analyzed for morbidity, short and long-term survival, and factors associated with outcomes. Results: In total, 39 patients from 8 centers underwent associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma from 2010 to 2020. The median preoperative future liver remnant volume was 323 mL (155-460 mL). The median future liver remnant increase was 58.7% (8.9%-264. 5%) with a median interstage interval of 13 days (6-60 days). Post-stage 1 and post-stage 2 biliary leaks occurred in 2 (7.7%) and 4 (15%) patients. Six patients (23%) after stage 1 and 6 (23%) after stage 2 experienced grade 3 or higher complica-tions. Two patients (7.7%) died within 90 days after stage 2. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 92%, 69%, and 55%, respectively. A subgroup analysis revealed poor survival for patients under-going additional vascular resection and lymph node positivity. Lymph node-negative patients showed excellent survival demonstrated by 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of 86%, 86%, and 86%. Conclusion: This study highlights that the critical attitude toward associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma needs to be revised. In selected patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy can achieve favorable survival that compares to the outcome of established surgical treatment strategies reported in benchmark studies for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma including 1-stage hepatectomy and liver transplantation. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 2. |
- Capobianco, Ivan, et al.
(author)
-
Development and internal validation of the Comprehensive ALPPS Preoperative Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score : is the patient suitable for Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)?
- 2022
-
In: Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition. - Hong Kong : AME Publishing Company. - 2304-3881 .- 2304-389X. ; 11:1, s. 52-66
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Preoperative patient selection in associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is not always reliable with currently available scores, particularly in patients with primary liver tumor. This study aims to (I) to determine whether comorbidities and patients characteristics are a risk factor in ALPPS and (II) to create a score predicting 90-day mortality preoperatively. Methods: Thirteen high-volume centers participated in this retrospective multicentric study. A risk analysis based on patient characteristics, underlying disease and procedure type was performed to identify risk factors and model the CAPRA score. A nonparametric receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to estimate the predictive ability of our score against the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the age-adjusted CCI (aCCI), the ALPPS risk score before Stage 1 (ALPPS-RS I) and Stage 2 (ALPPS-RS2). The model was internally validated applying bootstrapping. Results: A total of 451 patients were included. Mortality was 14.4%. The CAPRA score is calculated based on the following formula: (0.1*age) - (2*BSA) +1 (in the presence of primary liver tumor) +1 (in the presence of severe cardiovascular disease) +2 (in the presence of moderate or severe diabetes) +2 (in the presence of renal disease) +2 (if classic ALPPS is planned). The predictive ability was 0.837 for the CAPRA score, 0.443 for CCI, 0.519 for aCCI, 0.693 for ALPPS-RS I and 0.807 for ALPPS-RS2. After 1,000 cycles of bootstrapping the C statistic was 0.793. The accuracy plot revealed a cut-off for optimal prediction of postoperative mortality of 4.70. Conclusions: Comorbidities play an important role in ALPPS and should be carefully considered when planning the procedure. By assessing the patients preoperative condition in relation to ALPPS, the CAPRA score has a very good ability to predict postoperative mortality.
|
|
| 3. |
- DeAngelis, Nicola, et al.
(author)
-
2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy
- 2021
-
In: World Journal of Emergency Surgery. - : BMC. - 1749-7922. ; 16:1
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Bile duct injury (BDI) is a dangerous complication of cholecystectomy, with significant postoperative sequelae for the patient in terms of morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life. BDIs have an estimated incidence of 0.4-1.5%, but considering the number of cholecystectomies performed worldwide, mostly by laparoscopy, surgeons must be prepared to manage this surgical challenge. Most BDIs are recognized either during the procedure or in the immediate postoperative period. However, some BDIs may be discovered later during the postoperative period, and this may translate to delayed or inappropriate treatments. Providing a specific diagnosis and a precise description of the BDI will expedite the decision-making process and increase the chance of treatment success. Subsequently, the choice and timing of the appropriate reconstructive strategy have a critical role in long-term prognosis. Currently, a wide spectrum of multidisciplinary interventions with different degrees of invasiveness is indicated for BDI management. These World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines have been produced following an exhaustive review of the current literature and an international expert panel discussion with the aim of providing evidence-based recommendations to facilitate and standardize the detection and management of BDIs during cholecystectomy. In particular, the 2020 WSES guidelines cover the following key aspects: (1) strategies to minimize the risk of BDI during cholecystectomy; (2) BDI rates in general surgery units and review of surgical practice; (3) how to classify, stage, and report BDI once detected; (4) how to manage an intraoperatively detected BDI; (5) indications for antibiotic treatment; (6) indications for clinical, biochemical, and imaging investigations for suspected BDI; and (7) how to manage a postoperatively detected BDI.
|
|
| 4. |
- Hernandez-Alejandro, Roberto, et al.
(author)
-
Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure for colorectal liver metastasis
- 2020
-
In: International Journal of Surgery. - : ELSEVIER. - 1743-9191 .- 1743-9159. ; 82, s. 103-108
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Since first described, Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) has garnered boisterous praise and fervent criticism. Its rapid adoption and employment for a variety of indications resulted in high perioperative morbidity and mortality. However recent risk stratification, refinement of technique to reduce the impact of stage I and progression along the learning curve have resulted in improved outcomes. The first randomized trial comparing ALPPS to two stage hepatectomy (TSH) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) was recently published demonstrating comparable perioperative morbidity and mortality with improved resectability and survival following ALPPS. In this review, as ALPPS enters the thirteenth year since conception, the current status of this contentious two stage technique is presented and best practices for deployment in the treatment of CRLM is codified.
|
|
