| 1. |
- Baiocchi, Gian Luca, et al.
(författare)
-
International consensus on a complications list after gastrectomy for cancer
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Gastric Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1436-3291 .- 1436-3305. ; 22:1, s. 172-189
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Perioperative complications can affect outcomes after gastrectomy for cancer, with high mortality and morbidity rates ranging between 10 and 40%. The absence of a standardized system for recording complications generates wide variation in evaluating their impacts on outcomes and hinders proposals of quality-improvement projects. The aim of this study was to provide a list of defined gastrectomy complications approved through international consensus. Methods: The Gastrectomy Complications Consensus Group consists of 34 European gastric cancer experts who are members of the International Gastric Cancer Association. A group meeting established the work plan for study implementation through Delphi surveys. A consensus was reached regarding a set of standardized methods to define gastrectomy complications. Results: A standardized list of 27 defined complications (grouped into 3 intraoperative, 14 postoperative general, and 10 postoperative surgical complications) was created to provide a simple but accurate template for recording individual gastrectomy complications. A consensus was reached for both the list of complications that should be considered major adverse events after gastrectomy for cancer and their specific definitions. The study group also agreed that an assessment of each surgical case should be completed at patient discharge and 90 days postoperatively using a Complication Recording Sheet. Conclusion: The list of defined complications (soon to be validated in an international multicenter study) and the ongoing development of an electronic datasheet app to record them provide the basic infrastructure to reach the ultimate goals of standardized international data collection, establishment of benchmark results, and fostering of quality-improvement projects.
|
|
| 2. |
- Coupland, Victoria H, et al.
(författare)
-
Hospital volume, proportion resected and mortality from oesophageal and gastric cancer : a population-based study in England, 2004-2008
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Gut. - : BMJ. - 0017-5749 .- 1468-3288. ; 62:7, s. 961-966
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE:This study assessed the associations between hospital volume, resection rate and survival of oesophageal and gastric cancer patients in England.DESIGN: 62 811 patients diagnosed with oesophageal or gastric cancer between 2004 and 2008 were identified from a national population-based cancer registration and Hospital Episode Statistics-linked dataset. Cox regression analyses were used to assess all-cause mortality according to hospital volume and resection rate, adjusting for case-mix variables (sex, age, socioeconomic deprivation, comorbidity and type of cancer). HRs and 95% CIs, according to hospital volume, were evaluated for three predefined periods following surgery: <30, 30-365, and >365 days. Analysis of mortality in relation to resection rate was performed among all patients and among the 13 189 (21%) resected patients.RESULTS:Increasing hospital volume was associated with lower mortality (p(trend)=0.0001; HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.95 for hospitals resecting 80+ and compared with <20 patients a year). In relative terms, the association between increasing hospital volume and lower mortality was particularly strong in the first 30 days following surgery (p(trend)<0.0001; HR 0.52, (0.39 to 0.70)), but a clinically relevant association remained beyond 1 year (p(trend)=0.0011; HR 0.82, (0.72 to 0.95)). Increasing resection rates were associated with lower mortality among all patients (p(trend)<0.0001; HR 0.86, (0.84 to 0.89) for the highest, compared with the lowest resection quintile).CONCLUSIONS:With evidence of lower short-term and longer-term mortality for patients resected in high-volume hospitals, this study supports further centralisation of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgical services in England.
|
|
