| 2. |
- Kerzenmacher, T., et al.
(författare)
-
Validation of NO2 and NO from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE)
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. - : Copernicus GmbH. - 1680-7316 .- 1680-7324. ; 8:19, s. 5801--5841-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Vertical profiles of NO2 and NO have been obtained from solar occultation measurements by the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE), using an infrared Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) and (for NO2) an ultraviolet-visible-near-infrared spectrometer, MAESTRO (Measurement of Aerosol Extinction in the Stratosphere and Troposphere Retrieved by Occultation). In this paper, the quality of the ACE-FTS version 2.2 NO2 and NO and the MAESTRO version 1.2 NO2 data are assessed using other solar occultation measurements (HALOE, SAGE II, SAGE III, POAM III, SCIAMACHY), stellar occultation measurements (GOMOS), limb measurements (MIPAS, OSIRIS), nadir measurements (SCIAMACHY), balloon-borne measurements (SPIRALE, SAOZ) and ground-based measurements (UV-VIS, FTIR). Time differences between the comparison measurements were reduced using either a tight coincidence criterion, or where possible, chemical box models. ACE-FTS NO2 and NO and the MAESTRO NO2 are generally consistent with the correlative data. The ACE-FTS and MAESTRO NO2 volume mixing ratio (VMR) profiles agree with the profiles from other satellite data sets to within about 20% between 25 and 40 km, with the exception of MIPAS ESA (for ACE-FTS) and SAGE II (for ACE-FTS (sunrise) and MAESTRO) and suggest a negative bias between 23 and 40 km of about 10%. MAESTRO reports larger VMR values than the ACE-FTS. In comparisons with HALOE, ACE-FTS NO VMRs typically (on average) agree to ±8% from 22 to 64 km and to +10% from 93 to 105 km, with maxima of 21% and 36%, respectively. Partial column comparisons for NO2 show that there is quite good agreement between the ACE instruments and the FTIRs, with a mean difference of +7.3% for ACE-FTS and +12.8% for MAESTRO.
|
|
| 3. |
- Amekudzi, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Assessing extrajurisdictional and areawide impacts of clustered brownfield developments
- 2003
-
Ingår i: Journal of urban planning and development. - 0733-9488 .- 1943-5444. ; 129:1, s. 27-44
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Brownfields are vacant, underutilized, or abandoned industrial and commercial sites where real or perceived environmental contamination is an obstacle to development. Federal initiatives in the 1990s reduced legal liabilities associated with brownfields and provided financial incentives for development initiatives. As brownfields are often located in infill areas, they have advantages over greenfields developments in that much of the supporting infrastructure already exists and they are centrally located. However, the existing infrastructure may be deteriorated and obsolete, and brownfield developments in infill areas may require local as well as areawide transportation improvements. This paper uses a modified impact analysis approach, synthesized from regional transportation modeling and site impact analysis tools, to assess the extrajurisdictional and areawide impacts of clustered brownfield developments. The writers apply this approach to clustered brownfield developments in the City of Pittsburgh. The study results show that the synergistic effects and areawide impacts of clustered brownfield developments may not be adequately captured by traditional site impact studies. This paper is potentially useful for municipal agencies involved in assessing and planning for the transportation improvement needs of clustered brownfield developments.
|
|
