| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Carlsen Misic, Martina, 1986-, et al.
(författare)
-
Balancing power by including parents as co-researchers : Live parental singing, breastfeeding, skin-to-skin-contact as procedural support in Swedish neonatal pain care
- 2022
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Frequent and inadequately treated pain combined with separation from the parent cause adverse interruptions to the parent-infant attachment process. The pain might harm the infant physically and psychologically including increasing the risk for abnormally heightened sensitivity to pain. Effective pain management strategies are needed and parent-delivered interventions such as infant-directed lullaby singing, breastfeeding and skin-to-skin contact where parents themselves mediate pain relief, is consistent with a modern understanding of pain and of family-integrated care. Important for translating research into practice is to involve healthcare professionals and parents as co-researchers. Neonatal pain research is an interdisciplinary field where music therapy has just started to publish results. The Nordic neonatal music therapy pain management strategy provides a theoretical and practical resource-oriented music therapy model of how parent-delivered infant-directed singing can be comprehensively used in interdisciplinary neonatal pain research. Parents as pain management in Swedish neonatal care (SWEpap), is a new cutting-edge interdisciplinary multi-centre clinical study with mixed methods. The collaborative participatory action research design for the qualitative part of the SWEpap study aims to democratise the research process involving both parents and health professionals in the knowledge-making. The second part of SWEpap is a randomised controlled trial informed by music therapy expertise and research using the Nordic neonatal music therapy pain management strategy as a theoretical framework for its design. The RCT will investigate the efficacy of combined pain management with live parental lullaby singing, breastfeeding and skin-to-skin contact compared with standard pain care during routine metabolic screening of newborn infants.
|
|
| 3. |
- Carlsen Misic, Martina, 1986-, et al.
(författare)
-
Nurses' perception, knowledge, and use of neonatal pain assessment
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Paediatric and Neonatal Pain. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 2379-5824 .- 2637-3807. ; 3:2, s. 68-74
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Preterm and sick newborn infants undergo several painful procedures during their hospital stay, potentially leading to short‐ and long‐term negative consequences. Pain assessment should be performed regularly to provide optimal pain management. Nurses' knowledge of and attitude toward neonatal pain assessment affect how pain is assessed and managed in the clinical situation. The aim of this study was to explore Swedish nurses' perception, knowledge, and use of neonatal pain assessment. This descriptive, cross‐sectional questionnaire study was conducted across all Swedish neonatal units (n = 38). Respondents were chosen through convenience sampling by the head nurses at each unit. Ten nurses from each unit were asked to complete the survey, which contained both closed and open questions. A majority of the units (30/38; 79%) participated and 232 surveys were returned, a response rate of 61%. Of the nurses, 91% thought that neonatal pain assessment was important. Many nurses mentioned various difficulties with pain assessment and concerns that the scales used might not assess pain correctly. About half of the nurses considered themselves to have enough knowledge of neonatal pain assessment. Those who reported having enough knowledge of pain assessment viewed the pain scales used at their units more positively. Of the nurses, 74% reported using a pain assessment scale several times per work shift. Pain management guidelines were available according to 75% of nurses, but only 53% reported that the guidelines were followed. Although nurses in general expressed a positive attitude toward pain assessment scales, this was not necessarily evident in their clinical practice. Lack of knowledge, available or accessible guidelines, or concerns regarding the validity of available pain scales seemed to limit their use.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
