| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Insulander, J., et al.
(författare)
-
Prognosis following surgical bypass compared with laparotomy alone in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma
- 2016
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 103:9, s. 1200-1208
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Resection with curative intent has been shown to prolong survival of patients with locoregional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, up to 33 per cent of patients are deemed unresectable at exploratory laparotomy owing to unanticipated locally advanced or metastatic disease. In these patients, prophylactic double bypass (PDB) procedures have been considered the standard of care. The aim of this study was to compare PDB with exploratory laparotomy alone in terms of impact on postoperative course, chemotherapy and overall survival.Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study (2004-2013) was conducted using a prospective institutional database. Patients with histologically confirmed, unresectable PDAC were included. Relationships between PDB procedures, exploratory laparotomy alone, postoperative chemotherapy and best supportive care were investigated by means of Cox regression. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimations and log rank test.Results: Of 503 patients with PDAC scheduled for resection with curative intent, 104 were deemed unresectable at laparotomy (resection rate 79·3 per cent). Seventy-four patients underwent PDB procedures and 30 had exploratory laparotomy alone. PDB and exploratory laparotomy were similar in terms of perioperative mortality, initiation of chemotherapy and overall survival. Compared with best supportive care, postoperative chemotherapy prolonged survival (8·0 versus 14·4 months in locally advanced PDAC, P = 0·007; 2·3 versus 8·0 months in metastatic PDAC, P < 0·001). Patients undergoing chemotherapy following exploratory laparotomy alone had longer median overall survival than patients undergoing chemotherapy following PDB procedures (16·3 versus 10·3 months; P = 0·040).Conclusion: Patients with pancreatic cancer deemed unresectable at laparotomy may derive survival benefit from subsequent chemotherapy as opposed to supportive care alone. At laparotomy, proceeding with a bypass procedure for prophylactic symptom control may be prognostically unfavourable.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Sadr Azodi, O., et al.
(författare)
-
Genetic and environmental influences on the risk of acute appendicitis in twins
- 2009
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - West Sussex, United Kingdom : John Wiley & Sons. - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 96:11, s. 1336-1340
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Acute appendicitis is common but the aetiology is unclear. This study examined the heritability of acute appendicitis.Methods: The study included twin pairs with known zygosity born between 1959 and 1985. Individuals with acute appendicitis were found by record linkage with the Swedish Inpatient Register. Comparing monodizygotic and dizygotic twins, the similarity and relative proportions of phenotypic variance resulting from genetic and environmental factors were analysed. Risks of acute appendicitis explained by heritability and environmental effects were estimated.Results: Some 3441 monozygotic and 2429 dizygotic twins were identified. Almost no genetic effects were found in males (8 (95 per cent confidence interval 0 to 50) per cent), but shared (31 (0 to 49) per cent) and non-shared (61 (47 to 74) per cent) environmental factors accounted for this risk. In females, the heritability was estimated as 20 (0 to 36) per cent and the remaining variation was due to non-shared environmental factors (80 (64 to 98) per cent). For the sexes combined, genetic effects accounted for 30 (5 to 40) per cent and non-shared environmental effects for 70 (60 to 81) per cent of the risk.Conclusion: Acute appendicitis has a complex aetiology with sex differences in heritability and environmental factors.
|
|
| 10. |
- Sanjeevi, Srinivas, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of delay between imaging and treatment in patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer
- 2015
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 103:3, s. 267-275
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Locoregional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may progress rapidly and/or disseminate despite having an early stage at diagnostic imaging. A prolonged interval from imaging to resection might represent a risk factor for encountering tumour progression at laparotomy. The aim of this study was to determine the therapeutic window for timely surgical intervention.Methods: This observational cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed PDAC scheduled for resection with curative intent from 2008 to 2014. The impact of imaging-to-resection/reassessment (IR) interval, vascular involvement and tumour size on local tumour progression or presence of metastases at reimaging or laparotomy was evaluated using univariable and multivariable regression. Risk estimates were approximated using hazard ratios (HRs).Results: Median IR interval was 42 days. Of 349 patients scheduled for resection, 82 had unresectable disease (resectability rate 76.5 per cent). The unresectability rate was zero when the IR interval was 22 days or shorter, and was lower for an IR interval of 32 days or less compared with longer waiting times (13 versus 26.2 per cent; HR 0.42, P = 0.021). It was also lower for tumours smaller than 30 mm than for larger tumours (13.9 versus 32.5 per cent; HR 0.34, P < 0.001). Tumours with no or minor vascular involvement showed decreased rates of unresectable disease (20.6 per cent versus 38 per cent when there was major or combined vascular involvement; HR 0.43, P = 0.007). However, this failed to reach statistical significance on multivariable analysis (P = 0.411), in contrast to IR interval (P = 0.028) and tumour size (P < 0.001).Conclusion: Operation within 32 days of diagnostic imaging reduced the risk of tumour progression to unresectable disease by half compared with a longer waiting time. The results of this study highlight the importance of efficient clinical PDAC management.
|
|
