| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Kollind, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Shock treatment in a cohort of Scandinavian intensive care units in 2014
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. - : WILEY-BLACKWELL. - 0001-5172 .- 1399-6576. ; 60:7, s. 945-957
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundShock is common in intensive care units, and treatment includes fluids, vasopressor and/or inotropic drugs, guided by hemodynamic monitoring. The aim of this study was to identify current practice for treatment of shock in Scandinavian intensive care units. MethodsSeven-day inception cohort study in 43 intensive care units in Scandinavia. Patients 15years old receiving more than 4h of cardiovascular acting drug infusion were included. The use of fluids, vasopressor and inotropic drugs, type of monitoring, and target values were recorded. ResultsOne hundred and seventy-one patients were included. At inclusion, 136/168 (81%) had received vasopressor and/or inotropic drug therapy for less than 24h, and 143/171 (84%) had received volume loading before the onset of vasoactive drug treatment. Ringers solution was given to 129/143 (90%) of patients and starches in 3/143 (2%) patients. Noradrenaline was the most commonly used cardiovascular acting drug, given in 168/171 (98%) of cases while dopamine was rarely used. Mean arterial pressure was considered the most important variable for hemodynamic monitoring. Invasive arterial blood pressure was monitored in 166/171 (97%) of patients, arterial pulse wave analysis in 11/171 (7%), and echocardiography in 50/171 (29%). ConclusionIn this survey, Ringers solution and noradrenaline were the most common first-line treatments in shock. The use of starches and dopamine were rare. Almost all patients were monitored with invasive arterial blood pressure, but comprehensive hemodynamic monitoring was used only in a minority of patients.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Penketh, J A, et al.
(författare)
-
Airway management during in hospital cardiac arrest: An international, multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Resuscitation. - : Elsevier BV. - 1873-1570 .- 0300-9572. ; 153, s. 143-8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To determine the type of airway devices used during in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) resuscitation attempts.International multicentre retrospective observational study of in-patients aged over 18 years who received chest compressions for cardiac arrest from April 2016 to September 2018. Patients were identified from resuscitation registries and rapid response system databases. Data were collected through review of resuscitation records and hospital notes. Airway devices used during cardiac arrest were recorded as basic (adjuncts or bag-mask), or advanced, including supraglottic airway devices, tracheal tubes or tracheostomies. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression modelling were used for data analysis.The final analysis included 598 patients. No airway management occurred in 36 (6%), basic airway device use occurred at any time in 566 (95%), basic airway device use without an advanced airway device in 182 (30%), tracheal intubation in 322 (54%), supraglottic airway in 103 (17%), and tracheostomy in 1 (0.2%). There was significant variation in airway device use between centres. The intubation rate ranged between 21-90% while supraglottic airway use varied between 1-45%. The choice of tracheal intubation vs. supraglottic airway as the second advanced airway device was not associated with immediate survival from the resuscitation attempt (odds ratio 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.35-1.8).There is wide variation in airway device use during resuscitation after IHCA. Only half of patients are intubated before return of spontaneous circulation and many are managed without an advanced airway. Further investigation is needed to determine optimal airway device management strategies during resuscitation following IHCA.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
