| 1. |
- Almqvist, Bengt, et al.
(författare)
-
Handbok i hörselmätning
- 1990
-
Bok (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Denna bok ger en grundläggande kunskap om hörseln samt förmedlar förutsättningar för olika hörselmätmetoder. Viktiga inslag är felkällor vid hörselmätning, tolkning av mätresultat och lämplig teststrategi i olika tillämpningar. Inläst ur LIC, 1990
|
|
| 2. |
- Almqvist, Bengt, et al.
(författare)
-
Metodbok i praktisk hörselmätning
- 1983
-
Bok (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Denna bok är avsedd att användas vid utbildning av audionomer. Den kan dessutom vara en viktig referenskälla för alla övriga yrkesgrupper inom hörselvården. De metodbeskrivningar som presenteras i boken har goda förutsättningar att bidra till förbättrad hörselmätning
|
|
| 3. |
- Andersson, Eva, 1943-, et al.
(författare)
-
Audiometric screening of a population with intellectual disability
- 2013
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Audiology. - London : Informa Healthcare. - 1499-2027 .- 1708-8186. ; 52:1, s. 50-56
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Evaluation of pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in hearing screening of a population with mild to profound intellectual disability (ID).Design: PTA was performed at six frequencies at the screening level 20 dB HL. Referral criteria were threshold levels ≥ 25 dB HL at two or more frequencies for one ear or both.Study sample: 1478 participants aged 7–91 years were included.Results: 1470 (99.5%) people cooperated in screening of which 1325 (90%) could be tested on both ears at all six frequencies. A majority, 987 (66.8%), performed ordinary PTA, 234 (15.8%) conditioned play audiometry, and 249 (16.9%) behavioural observation audiometry. Six hundred and sixty-nine (45%) passed and 809 (55%) failed according to referral criteria. Of those failing, 441 (54.5%) accepted referral to clinical evaluation.Conclusions: PTA with slight modifications is applicable for screening of a population with mild to profound intellectual disability. The most challenging and time-consuming activity is to introduce the test procedure in a way that reduces anxiety and establishes trust.
|
|
| 4. |
- Andersson, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Evaluation of OAE-recording as a complementary test method for adults with moderate to profound mental retardation
- 2000
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Audiology. - : Taylor & Francis. - 0105-0397 .- 1940-2872. ; 29:2, s. 120-126
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The recording of otoacoustic emissions (OAE) was evaluated as a complementary test method for adults with moderate to profound mental retardation (MR). A portable apparatus, ILO 288 Echoport linked to a Compaq LTE 5100 notebook with software ILO 88 V 4.2, was used. Otoscopy and tympanometry were also performed. Criteria for emissions were S/N 3 dB or more and reproducibility 60% or more for at least three frequency-bands. The criteria for partial emissions were the same, but for only one or two frequencies. Two examiners were needed: one to keep the tested person calm and quiet and the other to handle the keyboard. Thirty-eight people with different degrees of MR in connection with other disabilities were included. They had all exhibited incomplete results in a previous hearing screening of more than 1000 adults with MR. Reproducible transiently evoked OAEs (TEOAE) were recorded from II ears (7 people), partial TEOAEs from 6 ears (4 people) and no emissions from 15 ears (10 people). Registration from 24 ears (13 people) could not be evaluated because of too much external and internal noise. Eight people rejected the examination. Only four people showed emissions in both ears. Accordingly, 34 people (89.5%) had to be re-tested or referred for further investigation, 21 of them (55%) because of noisy recordings or no co-operation. It is concluded that the TEOAE-test in its present form cannot fulfil the demands for a functioning test method for this population. In single cases, however, TEOAE-recording can complement other audiological tests.
|
|
| 5. |
- Andersson, Sara, et al.
(författare)
-
Rehabilitering
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Nordisk lärobok i audiologi. - Bromma : C. A. Tegnér AB. - 9789163194405 ; , s. 325-389
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Sjukdomstillstånd och skador i organ och vävnader orsakar diverse funktionella avvikelser, som i sin tur ger upphov till symptom, som personen ifråga kan iaktta och lida av. Dessa orsakar funktionsnedsättningar, som påverkar individens möjligheter att fungera och klara sig i sin dagliga miljö hemma, i olika arbetssituationer och i olika sociala sammanhang.
|
|
| 6. |
- Arlinger, Stig, 1939-
(författare)
-
A survey of public health policy on bilateral fittings and comparison with market trends : The evidence-base required to frame policy
- 2006
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Audiology. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1499-2027 .- 1708-8186. ; 45:SUPPL. 1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This report presents a review of the situation in a number of countries with respect to public health policy for funding of hearing aid services in general and support to bilateral fittings in particular. The data show considerable variations among the countries studied in number of hearing aids fitted per 1000 inhabitants, differing by a factor of 6 between the extremes. Also the percentage of bilateral fittings differs with an average estimated to be of the order of 50%. For hearing-impaired children, bilateral fittings are given full financial support in most countries studied. The data presented indicate the need for a reliable, scientifically valid evidence-base regarding bilateral hearing aid fitting. © 2006 British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society.
|
|
| 7. |
- Arlinger, Stig, 1939-
(författare)
-
Audiologic diagnosis of infants
- 2000
-
Ingår i: Seminars in Hearing. - 0734-0451 .- 1098-8955. ; 21, s. 379-387
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 8. |
- Arlinger, Stig, 1939-
(författare)
-
Can we establish internationally equivalent outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation?
- 2000
-
Ingår i: Ear and Hearing. - 0196-0202 .- 1538-4667. ; 21:4 SUPPL.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: This paper intends to discuss issues related to cultural, ethnic, and other nonaudiological variables that may affect the response when trying to determine outcome of audiological rehabilitation in different countries. Design: The ideal measure for the determination of outcome of audiological rehabilitation would be sensitive to changes in disability as well as handicap. Further, it would allow unforeseen effects to be identified and not be limited by language borders or cultural and ethnic differences. A variety of critical factors are discussed that are related to culture, social traditions, ethnic factors, etc. that may affect outcome measures and thus make international equivalence difficult. Conclusions: With careful consideration of the factors discussed, a basic set of questions could be formulated and agreed on, calibrated on suitable populations in different countries, and thereafter used as a bridge across borders to allow comparison of different procedures or meta-analyses of studies performed by different laboratories.
|
|
| 9. |
- Arlinger, Stig, 1939-, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical trial of a digital hearing aid
- 1998
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Audiology. - : Taylor & Francis. - 0105-0397 .- 1940-2872. ; 27:1, s. 51-61
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A clinical trial of Oticon DigiFocus hearing aid was performed. The test aid was evaluated on 33 subjects with several years' experience as users of modern analog hearing aids. These aids were used as reference for the 1-month-long trial. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) showed a mean difference in benefit with superior ratings for the test aid concerning ease of communication, speech in reverberation and speech in background noise. The subjects' own aids were rated somewhat better concerning aversiveness of sounds, but this difference was not statistically significant. The Gothenburg Profile showed a statistically significant difference between the test aid and the reference aids in favour of the test aid. The difference was not most evident with regard to speech communication and the effects of hearing loss on social interactions. Sound quality ratings concerning clearness were significantly higher for the test aid. Speech recognition thresholds in noise were on average 0.7 dB better for the test aids when tested at speech levels 60 and 75 dB. The difference was statistically significant only at 75 dB. There was significant interaction between general preference and hearing aid type, indicating that overall sound quality was an important factor affecting the general preference for either the test aid or the reference aid. Twenty-three subjects generally preferred the test aid, six preferred their own aid and four stated no difference.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
