| 1. |
- Axer, S., et al.
(författare)
-
NON-RESPONSE AFTER GASTRIC BYPASS AND SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY - THE THEORETICAL NEED FOR REVISIONAL BARIATRIC SURGERY RESULTS FROM THE SCANDINAVIAN OBESITY SURGERY REGISTRY : Revisional surgery
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Obesity Surgery. - : Springer. - 0960-8923 .- 1708-0428. ; 32:Suppl. 2, s. 381-381
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Revisional surgery is a second-line treatment option after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (GBP) in patients with primary or secondary non-response. This study is an analysis of the theoretical need for revisional surgery when applying four indication benchmarks.Objective: The aim was to analyze the risk for primary and secondary non-response after SG and GBP.Setting: 44 hospitals in Sweden.Methods: Based on data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry, SG and GBP were compared regarding four endpoints: 1. Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) < 50%; 2. weight regain of more than 10 kg after nadir; 3. fulfillment of IFSO-guidelines; or 4. ADA-criteria for bariatric surgery two years after primary surgery.Results: 60 426 individuals were included in the study (SG: n=7856 and GBP: n=52 570). Compared to patients in the GBP-group, more SG patients failed to achieved a %EWL > 50% (23.0% versus 8.5%, p < .001), regained more than 10 kg after nadir (4.3% versus 2.5%, p < .001), more often fulfilled the IFSO-criteria (8.0% vs. 4.5%, p < .001) or the ADA criteria (3.3% vs. 1.8%, p < 001) for bariatric/metabolic surgery at the 2-year follow-up.Conclusions: SG is associated with a higher risk for primary and secondary non-response compared to gastric bypass. To offer revisional bariatric surgery to all non-responders exceeds the bounds of feasibility and operability. Hence, individual prioritization and intensified evaluation of alternative second-line treatments is necessary.
|
|
| 2. |
- Edholm, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Laparoscopy in Duodenal Switch : Safe and Halves Length of Stay in a Nationwide Cohort from the Scandinavian Obesity Registry
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. - : SAGE Publications. - 1457-4969 .- 1799-7267. ; 106:3, s. 230-234
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Unsatisfactory weight loss after gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy in super-obese patients (body mass index > 50) is a growing concern. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch results in greater weight loss, but is technically challenging to perform, especially as a laparoscopic procedure (Lap-DS). The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of Lap-DS and the corresponding open procedure (O-DS) in Sweden.MATERIAL AND METHODS:The data source was a nationwide cohort from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry and 317 biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch patients (mean body mass index = 56.7 ± 6.6 kg/m2, 38.4 ± 10.2 years, and 57% females) were analyzed. Follow-up at 30 days was complete in 98% of patients.RESULTS:The 53 Lap-DS patients were younger than the 264 patients undergoing O-DS (35.0 vs 39.1 years, p = 0.01). Operative time was 163 ± 38 min for lap-DS and 150 ± 31 min for O-DS, p = 0.01, with less bleeding in Lap-DS (94 vs 216 mL, p < 0.001). There was one conversion to open surgery. Patients undergoing Lap-DS had a shorter length of stay than O-DS, 3.3 versus 6.6 days, p = 0.02. No significant differences in overall complications within 30 days were seen (12% and 17%, respectively). Interestingly, the two leaks in Lap-DS were located at the entero-enteric anastomosis, while three out of four leaks in O-DS occurred at the top of the gastric tube.CONCLUSION:Lap-DS can be performed by dedicated bariatric surgeons as a single-stage procedure. The use of laparoscopic approach halved the length of stay, without increasing the risk for complications significantly. Any difference in long-term weight result is pending.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
