| 1. |
- Pillai, Rajath S, et al.
(författare)
-
Assessment of Somatosensory and Psychosocial Function of Patients With Trigeminal Nerve Damage
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Clinical Journal of Pain. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 1536-5409 .- 0749-8047. ; 36:5, s. 321-335
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: The present study assessed somatosensory changes related to trigeminal nerve damage using extensive evaluation tools and assessed the effect of such damage on the patients' psychosocial status and quality of life compared with healthy participants.METHODS: In 37 patients with intraorally or extraorally presenting trigeminal nerve damage diagnosed as painful or nonpainful posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy, psychophysical tests like quantitative sensory testing (QST) and qualitative sensory testing and the electrophysiological "nociceptive-specific" blink reflex were performed. The patients and 20 healthy participants completed a set of questionnaires assessing their psychosocial status and quality of life.RESULTS: A loss or gain of somatosensory function was seen in at least 1 QST parameter in >88.9% of the patients. Patients in whom extraoral QST was performed showed an overall loss of somatosensory function, whereas intraoral QST showed a general gain of somatosensory function. Qualitative sensory testing identified a side-to-side difference in the tactile and pinprick stimulation in >77% of the patients. An abnormal "nociceptive-specific" blink reflex response was seen in 42.1% to 71.4% of patients dependent on the trigeminal branch stimulated, though comparisons with healthy reference values showed ambiguous results. Compared with the healthy participants, patients showed higher scores for pain catastrophizing, symptoms of depression and anxiety, limited jaw function, more somatic symptoms, and significantly impaired oral health-related quality of life (all P<0.038).DISCUSSION: The results from the present study showed presence of varied somatosensory abnormalities when assessed using psychophysical and electrophysiological investigations and a significantly impaired psychosocial status.
|
|
| 2. |
- Taneja, Pankaj, et al.
(författare)
-
Assessment of experimental orofacial pain, pleasantness and unpleasantness via standardized psychophysical testing
- 2019
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Pain. - : WILEY. - 1090-3801 .- 1532-2149. ; 23:7, s. 1297-1308
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Somatosensory assessment within the orofacial region may be performed using highly standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST). However, the function of the C-tactile (CT) afferent, a nerve fibre linked to the perception of pleasant touch, is usually not evaluated. Furthermore, the perception of unpleasantness is also rarely assessed, a dimension not only limited to a painful experience. Therefore, the primary aim was to apply standardized QST stimuli as well as standardized pleasant stimuli and evaluate their potential capacity for evocation of perceived pain, pleasant and unpleasant sensations in the facial region. Methods Twenty-one female participants underwent QST as per the protocol derived from the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain. For the first time, two modified protocols were used to investigate stimuli for perceived pleasantness and unpleasantness. Results Thermal stimuli provided separate thresholds for each sensation. From certain mechanical stimuli (e.g., vibration), overlap between the perceived sensations of pleasantness and unpleasantness was identified. It was not possible to evoke only an unpleasant sensation without a painful contribution, and both these sensations increased significantly when utilizing an increasing pinprick force (p amp;lt; 0.011). Between dynamic stimuli, the brush was rated as significantly more pleasant than the cotton wool tip (p = 0.015). A quadratic model provided the best fit for velocity against mean pleasantness ratings (R-2 = 0.62 +/- 0.08), supporting previous CT afferent literature to some extent. Conclusion Stimuli were generally not isolated to one sensation, highlighting the multidimensional construct of stimulus perception and the need for scales to capture this. Significance The battery of QST tests from the DFNS protocol has been modified to investigate pleasant and unpleasant sensations. This allows the evaluation of psychophysical properties across standardized dimensions to provide a thorough view of somatosensory function and to better understand the affective spectrum of somatosensory function.
|
|
| 3. |
- Vase, Lene, et al.
(författare)
-
How May Placebo Mechanisms Influence Orofacial Neuropathic Pain?
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Dental Research. - : Sage Publications. - 0022-0345 .- 1544-0591. ; 98:8, s. 861-869
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- The conceptualization of placebo has changed from inactive pills to a detailed understanding of how patients' perception of receiving a treatment influences pain processing and overall treatment outcome. Large placebo effects were recently demonstrated in chronic neuropathic pain, thereby opening the question of whether placebo effects also apply to orofacial neuropathic pain. In this article, we review the new definitions, magnitude, and social, psychological, neurobiologic, and genetic mechanisms of placebo effects in pain, especially neuropathic pain, to illustrate that placebo effects are not simply response bias but psychoneurobiological phenomena that can be measured at many levels of the neuroaxis. We use this knowledge to carefully illustrate how patients' perceptions of the treatment, the relationship with the health care provider, and the expectations and emotions toward a treatment can influence test and treatment outcome and potentially skew the results if they are not taken into consideration. Orofacial neuropathic pain is a new research area, and we review the status on definition, diagnosis, mechanisms, and pharmacologic treatment of neuropathic pain after trigeminal nerve injury, as this condition may be especially influenced by placebo factors. Finally, we have a detailed discussion of how knowledge of placebo mechanisms may help improve the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of orofacial neuropathic pain, and we illustrate pitfalls and opportunities of applying this knowledge to the test of dental treatments.
|
|
| 4. |
- Watanabe, Takeshi, et al.
(författare)
-
Nocebo response in dentistry : A systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events in analgesic trials of third molar removal
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1365-2842 .- 0305-182X. ; 50:4, s. 332-342
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundThe nocebo response refers to the phenomenon where non-specific factors, including negative verbal suggestion and treatment expectations, cause adverse events (AE) following a placebo treatment. Non-specific factors are also likely to influence AE occurrence following administration of active pharmacological treatments. ObjectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to estimate the nocebo response in dentistry by assessing the AEs prevalence in placebo- and active arms of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing analgesic treatment following third molar (M3) surgery. MethodsA systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies had to report the number of patients experiencing at least one drug-related AE (patients with AE >= 1) separately for the active and placebo arms. The proportion of patients with AE >= 1 and drug-related dropouts were pooled, and risk differences (RDs) between patients in the placebo- and active arm were calculated. ResultsIn 50 independent RCTs of 47 identified articles, the pooled rates of patients with AE >= 1 were 22.8% in the placebo arm and 20.6% in the active arm. The pooled rates of drug-related dropout were 0.24% in the placebo arm and 0.08% in the active arm. There were no significant RDs in patients with AE >= 1 and drug-related dropouts. ConclusionThese results show that patients in the placebo arm reported AEs to the same extent as patients receiving active treatment, suggesting that most AEs in analgesic medication following M3 surgery may be attributed to the nocebo phenomenon.
|
|
| 5. |
- Watanabe, Takeshi, et al.
(författare)
-
What is the nocebo effect and does it apply to dentistry? : A narrative review
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1365-2842 .- 0305-182X. ; 49:5, s. 586-591
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Evidence for the nocebo effect, a phenomenon characterised by suboptimal treatment efficacy, worsening of symptoms, or the occurrence of adverse events caused by an individual's negative treatment expectations, is growing across a multitude of medical fields. Within dentistry, little attention has been paid to patients' negative expectations, despite a number of studies supporting the influence of related factors, such as dental fear and anxiety, on the severity of peri- and post-operative dental pain. Only recently, a small number of commentaries and letters have emerged, urging dentists to recognise the possible existence of nocebo effects in dentistry and its implications for patient care. The present review summarises essential evidence of the nocebo phenomenon especially in relation to pain and drug administration. Subsequently, an overview of the current evidence of the nocebo phenomenon in the dental field is presented. Finally, based on the general knowledge of the nocebo effect, the review indicates fruitful arrays of research into the nocebo effect in dentistry.
|
|
| 6. |
- Alstergren, Per, et al.
(författare)
-
Kroniska orofaciala smärtor i allmänpraktiken
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Tandläkartidningen. - : Tandläkarförbundet. - 0039-6982. ; 108:3, s. 78-83
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Det är viktigt att ha ett praktiskt material tillgängligt för diagnostik och behandling av patienter med kroniska orofaciala smärtor. Denna artikel innehåller en checklista för diagnostik av de vanligaste smärttillstånden. Konservativa reversibla behandlingsmetoder är minst lika effektiva som invasiva behandlingar och innebär långt mindre risk för att skada patienten, så de bör vara förstahandsalternativ för de allra flesta patienter med kroniska orofaciala smärtor.
|
|
| 7. |
- Baad-Hansen, Lene, et al.
(författare)
-
Blink reflexes in patients with atypical odontalgia
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Journal of Orofacial Pain. - : Quintessence. - 1064-6655 .- 1945-3396. ; 19:3, s. 223-247
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Aim: To examine the blink reflex (BR) evoked by stimulation of the trigeminal (V) nerve branches, to examine the painful V branch before and during a pain provocation test, and to compare the painful and the contra lateral non-painful branch in patients with atypical odon-talgia (AO). Methods: In thirteen patients with AO, the BR was elicited with the use of a concentric electrode and recorded bilaterally with surface EMG electrodes on both orbicularis oculi muscles. Electrical stimuli were applied to the skin above the V1, V2 and V3 nerve branches and to the V branch contralateral to the painful branch. The sensory and pain thresholds were determined. The BR examination of the painful V branch was repeated during a capsaicin pain provocation test. The data were analysed with use of non-parametric statistics. Results: The BR responses evoked by stimulation of the V3 were significantly lower than the BR responses evoked by stimulation of the V1 and V2 (P < 0.004). There were no differences in BR between the painful and non-painful side (P > 0.569), and the BR was not significantly modulated by experimental pain (P > 0.080). The sensory thresholds were significantly lower on the painful side compared to the non-painful side (P = 0.017). The pain thresholds were not different between sides (P > 0.910). Conclusion: These preliminary findings did not indicate major differences in the V nociceptive pathways between sides in AO patients. Future studies comparing the BR in AO patients with healthy volunteers are needed to provide further knowledge on the pain mechanisms in AO.
|
|
| 8. |
- Baad-Hansen, Lene, et al.
(författare)
-
Chair-side intraoral somatosensory examination in patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy subjects
- 2012
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Chair-side intraoral somatosensory examination in patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy subjects L Baad-Hansen, M Pigg, S Elmasry Ivanovic, H Faris, T List, M Drangsholt, P Svensson Aim of investigation: In patients with persistent orofacial pain, assessment of somatosensory function is recommended. A chair-side qualitative examination with good reliability revealing signs of hyper-/hyposensitivity to touch, cold and painful pinprick stimulation may be performed. The aim of this multicenter study was to compare three qualitative measures of intraoral somatosensory function between patients with atypical odontalgia (AO) and healthy subjects. Methods: 31 AO patients (6 male, 25 female; mean age: 54±13) and 47 healthy age- and sex-matched controls (15 male, 32 female: mean age: 47±12) were recruited from Malmö University (Sweden), University of Washington (USA) and Aarhus University (Denmark). In AO patients, sensitivity to touch, cold, and pinprick stimuli was evaluated on the buccal gingiva adjacent to the painful site and the corresponding contralateral ‘mirror-image’ gingival site. In healthy subjects, tests were performed bilaterally on the buccal gingiva adjacent to the first maxillary premolars. Patients were asked to report hyper-, hypo-, or normo-sensitivity/- algesia to touch, cold and painful stimuli on the painful site compared with the contralateral site; healthy subjects were asked to compare sensitivity between sides. Χ2-tests were used to analyze differences in frequency of hyper-, hyposensitivity or normosensitivity between groups. Results: The frequency of subjectively reported normosensitivity to all stimulus modalities were significantly lower in patients (23-58%) than in healthy subjects (68-91%), P<0.001. Frequency of hypersensitivity to all modalities were significantly higher in patients (29-61%) than in controls (9-17%), P<0.015, whereas reports of hyposensitivity were similar between groups (2-16%), P>0.054. Conclusion: A quick and simple chair-side evaluation of intraoral somatosensory function can detect intraoral sensory disturbances in AO patients, mainly in the form of hyper-sensitivity. These tests may be useful in the initial screening of patients with persistent orofacial pain.
|
|
| 9. |
- Baad-Hansen, Lene, et al.
(författare)
-
Chairside intraoral qualitative somatosensory testing : reliability and comparison between patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Journal of Orofacial Pain. - : Quintessence. - 1064-6655 .- 1945-3396. ; 27:2, s. 165-170
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: To assess intraoral inter- and intraexaminer reliability of three qualitative measures of intraoral somatosensory function and to compare these measures between patients with atypical odontalgia (AO) and healthy controls. METHODS: Thirty-one AO patients and 47 healthy controls participated. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability was tested on a subgroup of 46 subjects (25 AO; 21 healthy). Sensitivity to touch, cold, and pinprick stimuli was evaluated on the painful gingival site and the corresponding contralateral site in AO patients, and bilaterally on the gingiva of the first maxillary premolars in controls. Patients were asked to report hypersensitivity, hyposensitivity, or normal sensitivity to stimuli on the painful site compared with the nonpainful site. Kappa values were calculated, and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare frequencies between groups. RESULTS: Kappa values ranged between 0.63 and 0.75. The frequency of hypersensitivity to either modality was significantly higher in patients (29% to 61%) than in controls (9% to 17%) (P < .015), whereas reports of hyposensitivity were similar between groups (2% to 16%) (P > .057). Only 3.2% of the AO patients had no reports of abnormal sensitivity on any of the tests, compared with 59.6% of the healthy subjects (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Intraoral qualitative somatosensory testing can detect intraoral sensory disturbances in AO patients, and the reliability is sufficient for initial screening of orofacial somatosensory function.
|
|
| 10. |
- Baad-Hansen, Lene, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of clinical findings and psychosocial factors in patients with atypical odontalgia and temporomandibular disorders
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Journal of Orofacial Pain. - : Quintessence. - 1064-6655 .- 1945-3396. ; 22:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: To systematically compare clinical findings and psychosocial factors between patients suffering from atypical odontalgia (AO) and an age- and gender-matched group of patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).Methods: Forty-six AO patients (7 men and 39 women, mean age, 56 years) were compared with 41 TMD patients (8 men and 33 women, mean age, 58 years). Results: Mean pain intensity at the time of inclusion in the study was similar between the groups (TMD: 5.3 ± 0.4, AO: 5.0 ± 0.3), but pain duration was longer in AO patients (AO: 7.7 ± 1.1 years, TMD: 4.5 ± 0.1 years). Eighty-three percent of the AO patients and 15% of TMD patients reported pain onset in relation to dental/surgical procedures. Episodic tension-type headache (TTH) occurred equally in both groups (TMD: 46%, AO: 46%), but TMD patients more frequently experienced chronic TTH (TMD: 35%, AO: 18%), myofascial TMD (TMD: 93%, AO: 50%), and temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD: 66%, AO: 2%). Overall, TMD patients had lower pressure pain thresholds and poorer jaw function than AO patients. Mean depression and somatization scores were moderate to severe in both groups, and widespread pain was most common in TMD patients.Conclusion: AO and TMD share some characteristics but differ significantly in report of dental trauma, jaw function, pain duration, and pain site.
|
|
