| 1. |
- Backemar, Lovisa, et al.
(författare)
-
Comorbidities and Risk of Complications After Surgery for Esophageal Cancer : A Nationwide Cohort Study in Sweden.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: World Journal of Surgery. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0364-2313 .- 1432-2323. ; 39:9, s. 2282-8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The selection for surgery is multifaceted for patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Since it is uncertain how comorbidity should influence the selection, this study addressed comorbidities in relation to risk of severe complications following esophageal cancer surgery.METHODS: This population-based cohort study was based on prospectively included patients who underwent surgical resection for an esophageal or gastro-esophageal junctional cancer in Sweden during 2001-2005. The participation rate was 90%. Associations between pre-defined comorbidities and pre-defined post-operative complications occurring within 30 days of surgery were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. The resulting odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were adjusted for age, sex, tumor stage, tumor histology, neoadjuvant therapy, type of surgery, annual hospital volume, other comorbidities, and other complications.RESULTS: Among 609 included patients, those with cardiac disease (n = 92) experienced an increased risk of pre-defined complications in general (adjusted OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.13-2.90), while patients with hypertension (n = 137), pulmonary disorders (n = 79), diabetes (n = 67), and obesity (n = 66) did not. Patients with a Charlson comorbidity index score ≥2 had substantially increased risks of pre-defined complications (adjusted OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.60-3.72).CONCLUSION: Cardiac disease and a Charlson comorbidity index score ≥2 seem to increase the risk of severe and early post-operative complications in patients with esophageal cancer, while hypertension, pulmonary disorders, diabetes, and obesity do not. These findings should be considered in the clinical decision-making for improved selection of patients for surgery.
|
|
| 2. |
- Backemar, Lovisa
(författare)
-
Oesophageal cancer surgery : the role of co-morbidities
- 2016
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The overall aim of this thesis was to produce information which can be used to improve clinical decision-making in order to optimise treatment and improve the well-being of patients with oesophageal cancer following surgery. Oesophageal cancer is a devastating disease with poor prognosis. The most established curatively intended treatment involves major surgery, often in combination with neoadjuvant therapy, and comes with a high risk of morbidity and limited chance of long-term survival. The clinical decision process of determining which patients would benefit from surgery is critically important. Several factors are considered when evaluating whether a patient is suitable for surgery or not, but the main factors are tumour stage, general fitness and comorbidity. The focus of this thesis focus was to assess how co-morbidities in general, and specific co-morbidities in particular, influence mortality, morbidity and health related quality of life (HRQOL) after surgery for oesophageal cancer. A subjective outcome such as HRQOL is of great importance in this patient group which adds an extra dimension to more objective outcomes in determining the outcome of the treatment. The four studies included in the thesis were cohort studies from Sweden and England. Studies I and III were based on a prospective cohort including patients operated on between 2001 and 2005 in Sweden, and study II was based on a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent surgery between 1987 and 2010 in Sweden. Study IV used a prospective cohort of patients who underwent oesophagectomy at St Thomas’ Hospital London between 2011 and 2014/2015. In studies I and II, co-morbidity was examined in relation to mortality after oesophageal cancer surgery. There was an increased risk of mortality among patients with a Charlson co-morbidity index score ≥2 and among patients with a history of myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure. Study III assessed co-morbidity in relation to morbidity after surgery. Patients with ≥1 co-morbidities or cardiac disease had an increased risk of severe post-operative complications. In study IV, co-morbidity was assessed in relation to HRQOL. Before surgery, patients with co-morbidities had worse HRQOL for several aspects, while at 6 months following surgery, patients had deteriorated in most HRQOL aspect regardless of co-morbidity status, except for the fact that patients with several comorbidities had worse physical function, fatigue and more trouble with coughing compared to those with fewer co-morbidities. In conclusion, this thesis provides additional information on how co-morbidities affect outcomes following surgery for oesophageal cancer and could help to improve clinical decision-making for these patients.
|
|
| 3. |
- Backemar, Lovisa, et al.
(författare)
-
The Influence of Comorbidity on Health-Related Quality of Life After Esophageal Cancer Surgery
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgical Oncology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1068-9265 .- 1534-4681. ; 27:8, s. 2637-2645
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundEsophageal cancer surgery reduces patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study examined whether comorbidities influence HRQoL in these patients.MethodsThis prospective cohort study included esophageal cancer patients having undergone curatively intended esophagectomy at St Thomas’ Hospital London in 2011–2015. Clinical data were collected from patient reports and medical records. Well-validated cancer-specific and esophageal cancer-specific questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25) were used to assess HRQoL before and 6 months after esophagectomy. Number of comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA), and specific comorbidities were analyzed in relation to HRQoL aspects using multivariable linear regression models. Mean score differences with 95% confidence intervals were adjusted for potential confounders.ResultsAmong 136 patients, those with three or more comorbidities at the time of surgery had poorer global quality of life and physical function and more fatigue compared with those with no comorbidity. Patients with ASA III–IV reported more problems with the above HRQoL aspects and worse social function and pain compared with those with ASA I–II. Cardiac comorbidity was associated with worse global quality of life and dyspnea, while pulmonary comorbidities were related to coughing. Patients assessed both before and 6 months after surgery (n = 80) deteriorated in most HRQoL aspects regardless of comorbidity status, but patients with several comorbidities had worse physical function and fatigue and more trouble with coughing compared with those with fewer comorbidities.ConclusionComorbidity appears to negatively influence HRQoL before esophagectomy, but appears not to severely impact 6-month recovery of HRQoL.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
