| 1. |
- Chye, Yann, et al.
(författare)
-
Subcortical surface morphometry in substance dependence : An ENIGMA addiction working group study
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Addiction Biology. - : WILEY. - 1355-6215 .- 1369-1600. ; 25:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- While imaging studies have demonstrated volumetric differences in subcortical structures associated with dependence on various abused substances, findings to date have not been wholly consistent. Moreover, most studies have not compared brain morphology across those dependent on different substances of abuse to identify substance-specific and substance-general dependence effects. By pooling large multinational datasets from 33 imaging sites, this study examined subcortical surface morphology in 1628 nondependent controls and 2277 individuals with dependence on alcohol, nicotine, cocaine, methamphetamine, and/or cannabis. Subcortical structures were defined by FreeSurfer segmentation and converted to a mesh surface to extract two vertex-level metrics-the radial distance (RD) of the structure surface from a medial curve and the log of the Jacobian determinant (JD)-that, respectively, describe local thickness and surface area dilation/contraction. Mega-analyses were performed on measures of RD and JD to test for the main effect of substance dependence, controlling for age, sex, intracranial volume, and imaging site. Widespread differences between dependent users and nondependent controls were found across subcortical structures, driven primarily by users dependent on alcohol. Alcohol dependence was associated with localized lower RD and JD across most structures, with the strongest effects in the hippocampus, thalamus, putamen, and amygdala. Meanwhile, nicotine use was associated with greater RD and JD relative to nonsmokers in multiple regions, with the strongest effects in the bilateral hippocampus and right nucleus accumbens. By demonstrating subcortical morphological differences unique to alcohol and nicotine use, rather than dependence across all substances, results suggest substance-specific relationships with subcortical brain structures.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Laehteenvuo, M, et al.
(författare)
-
Associations between antipsychotic use, substance use and relapse risk in patients with schizophrenia: real-world evidence from two national cohorts
- 2022
-
Ingår i: The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science. - : Royal College of Psychiatrists. - 1472-1465. ; 221:6, s. 758-765
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Research on the effectiveness of pharmacotherapies for schizophrenia and comorbid substance use disorder (SUD) is very sparse, and non-existent on the prevention of the development of SUDs in patients with schizophrenia.AimsTo compare the real-world effectiveness of antipsychotics in schizophrenia in decreasing risk of developing an initial SUD, and psychiatric hospital admission and SUD-related hospital admission among patients with an SUD.MethodTwo independent national cohorts including all persons diagnosed with schizophrenia (N = 45 476) were followed up for 22 (Finland: 1996–2017) and 11 (Sweden: 2006–2016) years. Risk of developing an SUD was calculated with between-individual models, and risks of psychiatric and SUD-related hospital admission were calculated with within-individual models, using Cox regression and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for using versus not using certain antipsychotics.ResultsFor patients with schizophrenia without an SUD, clozapine use (Finland: aHR 0.20, 95% CI 0.16–0.24, P < 0.001; Sweden: aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.24–0.50, P < 0.001) was associated with lowest risk of developing an initial SUD in both countries. Antipsychotic polytherapy was associated with second lowest risk (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.44–0.66) in Sweden, and third lowest risk (aHR 0.47, 95% CI 0.42–0.53) in Finland. Risk of relapse (psychiatric hospital admission and SUD-related hospital admission) were lowest for clozapine, antipsychotic polytherapy and long-acting injectables in both countries. Results were consistent across both countries.ConclusionsClozapine and antipsychotic polytherapy are most strongly associated with reduced risk of developing SUDs among patients with schizophrenia, and with lower relapse rates among patients with both diagnoses.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Lahteenvuo, M, et al.
(författare)
-
Effectiveness of antipsychotics in schizophrenia with comorbid substance use disorder
- 2021
-
Ingår i: EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY. - : Royal College of Psychiatrists. - 0924-9338 .- 1778-3585. ; 64, s. S161-S161
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Schizophrenia is highly comorbid with substance use disorders (SUD), which may negatively impact the course of illness. However, large studies exploring the best lines of treatment for this combination are lacking.ObjectivesWe investigated what are the most effective antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia in preventing the development of substance use disorders and preventing hospitalizations in patients already having substance use disorder.MethodsWe used two independent national cohort registries including all patient with schizophrenia aged under 46 years. Participants were followed during 22 (1996–2017, Finland) and 11 years (2006–2016, Sweden). We studied risk of rehospitalization, and risk of developing an SUD when using vs. not using antipsychotics, using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis models.Results45,476 patients with schizophrenia were identified (30,860 in Finland; 14,616 in Sweden). For patients without SUD, clozapine and antipsychotic polytherapy were associated with the lowest risks of developing SUD in both countries. For patients with co-existing SUD, the risk of hospitalization was the lowest during clozapine, polytherapy and long-acting injectable use.ConclusionsIn patients with schizophrenia and comorbid SUD, antipsychotic medications were effective in preventing relapses. In those without an SUD, antipsychotic use was associated with a markedly reduced risk of developing an initial SUD. Clozapine and long-acting injectables should be considered treatments of choice in patients with schizophrenia and SUD, or at risk of developing co-morbid SUD.DisclosureML: Genomi Solutions Ltd, DNE Ltd, Sunovion, Orion Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, Finnish Medical Foundation, Emil Aaltonen Foundation. HT, EMR, AT: Eli Lilly, Janssen–Cilag. JT: Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Lahteenvuo, M, et al.
(författare)
-
Morbidity and mortality in schizophrenia with comorbid substance use disorders in Finland and Sweden
- 2021
-
Ingår i: EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY. - : Royal College of Psychiatrists. - 0924-9338 .- 1778-3585. ; 64, s. S237-S238
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Schizophrenia is highly comorbid with substance use disorders (SUD) but large epidemiological cohorts exploring the prevalence and prognostic significance of SUD are lacking.ObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence of SUD in patients with schizophrenia in Finland and Sweden, and the effect of these co-occurring disorders on risks of psychiatric hospitalization and mortality.Methods45,476 individuals with schizophrenia from two independent national cohort studies, aged <46 years at cohort entry, were followed during 22 (1996-2017, Finland) and 11 years (2006-2016, Sweden). We first assessed SUD prevalence (excluding smoking). Then we performed Cox regression on risk of psychiatric hospitalization and mortality in patients with schizohrenia and SUD compared with those without SUD.ResultsThe prevalence of SUD in specialized healthcare ranged from 26% (Finland) to 31% (Sweden). Multiple drug use and alcohol use disorders were the most prevalent SUD, followed by cannabis use disorders. Any SUD comorbidity, and particularly multiple drug use and alcohol use, were associated with 50% to 100% increases in hospitalization and mortality compared to individuals without SUD. Elevated mortality risks were observed especially for deaths due to suicide and other external causes. All results were similar across countries.ConclusionsCo-occurring SUD, and particularly alcohol and multiple drug use, are associated with high rates of hospitalization and mortality in patients with schizophrenia. Preventive interventions should prioritize detection and tailored treatments for these co-morbidities, which often remain underdiagnosed and untreated.Conflict of interestML: Genomi Solutions Ltd, Nursie Health Ltd, Sunovion, Orion Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, Finnish Medical Foundation, Emil Aaltonen Foundation. HT, EMR, AT: Eli Lilly, Janssen–Cilag. JT: Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka.
|
|
| 8. |
- Pinzon-Espinosa, J, et al.
(författare)
-
Barriers to genetic testing in clinical psychiatry and ways to overcome them: from clinicians' attitudes to sociocultural differences between patients across the globe
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Translational psychiatry. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2158-3188. ; 12:1, s. 442-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Genetic testing has evolved rapidly over recent years and new developments have the potential to provide insights that could improve the ability to diagnose, treat, and prevent diseases. Information obtained through genetic testing has proven useful in other specialties, such as cardiology and oncology. Nonetheless, a range of barriers impedes techniques, such as whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing, pharmacogenomics, and polygenic risk scoring, from being implemented in psychiatric practice. These barriers may be procedural (e.g., limitations in extrapolating results to the individual level), economic (e.g., perceived relatively elevated costs precluding insurance coverage), or related to clinicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices (e.g., perceived unfavorable cost-effectiveness, insufficient understanding of probability statistics, and concerns regarding genetic counseling). Additionally, several ethical concerns may arise (e.g., increased stigma and discrimination through exclusion from health insurance). Here, we provide an overview of potential barriers for the implementation of genetic testing in psychiatry, as well as an in-depth discussion of strategies to address these challenges.
|
|
