| 1. |
- Batory, Agnes, et al.
(författare)
-
Regulating Collaboration : The Legal Framework of Collaborative Governance in Ten European Countries
- 2020
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Public Administration. - New York : Taylor & Francis. - 0190-0692 .- 1532-4265. ; 43:9, s. 780-789
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Many scholars have considered when and why collaboration between government agencies and societal actors occurs. This article argues that a simple but largely overlooked answer to these questions is that a formal legal or administrative requirement to do so is in place. Therefore, the objective is to substantiate whether there are legal requirements to collaborate and in what type of source and context this obligation applies in ten European countries. The main finding is that collaboration is underpinned by an extensive range of legal requirements in Europe, although imposing these requirements is generally not the main objective. © 2019 The Author(s).
|
|
| 2. |
- Batory, Agnes, et al.
(författare)
-
The fuzzy concept of collaborative governance : A systematic review of the state of the art
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Central European Journal of Public Policy. - Warsaw : Sciendo. - 1802-4866. ; 13:2, s. 28-39
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article contributes to the consolidation and synthesis of scholarship on collaborative governance by expanding our knowledge of how the term is used in the academic literature and policy documents in a range of European countries. It adds value to the existing reviews of the field by conducting a systematic literature review on a corpus of over 700 article abstracts and a traditional literature review identifying five key analytical dimensions. The article also provides an exploratory analysis of grey literature hitherto outside the purview of researchers and considers the linguistic and cultural connotations that alter the meaning of the term when translated into new contexts in ten EU/EFTA countries. Findings indicate heterogeneity and fuzziness in the way the concept is used. The article argues that explicit positions with respect to five main analytical dimensions and taking into account the national connotations that the term carries across political systems would inject more clarity into the academic discourse. This, in turn, will help policymakers to make informed use of the concept, especially in multi-national policy-making arenas. © 2019 Agnes Batory et al., published by Sciendo 2019.
|
|
| 3. |
- Batory, Agnes, et al.
(författare)
-
The Use and Abuse of Participatory Governance by Populist Governments
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Policy and politics (Print). - Bristol : Policy Press. - 0305-5736 .- 1470-8442. ; 47:2, s. 227-244
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Populists claim that they alone represent the voice of the people against a corrupt elite. We argue that populist governments augment this claim by appropriating and manipulating the language and methods of participatory governance. Advancing an analytical framework on content, process, effect, resource efficiency and communication dimensions, we illustrate these arguments with the National Consultations in Hungary in 2010–18. Our conclusion for the case study is that these exercises were deeply flawed for securing popular input into policy-making. The implication for scholarship is that participatory governance enthusiasts need to be more aware not just of the uses, but also the abuses, of public input, while scholars of populism should pay more attention to the actual policies and practices populist actors employ to gain or maintain power.
|
|
| 4. |
- Svensson, Sara, 1975-, et al.
(författare)
-
(e-)Participation and propaganda : The mix of old and new technology in Hungarian national consultations
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Engaging Citizens in Policy Making. - Cheltenham : Edward Elgar Publishing. - 9781800374355 - 9781800374362 ; , s. 56-70
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This chapter provides a case study of the use of online platforms for national consultations that target all citizens in Hungary. The Hungarian government, since 2010 led by the national-conservative populist party Fidesz, has carried out what is the most extensive series of consultations in contemporary Europe if measured by the share of citizens involved. The consultations are dominantly conducted by questionnaires that are printed and mailed by the postal service to all citizens, but recent consultations have also offered an online platform. Drawing on previous research on what happens when populist actors employ and institutionalize participatory methods, the chapter extends the inquiry to include the use of an electronic platform. Findings of this work shows that the online component has so far not led to new dynamics, and to the limited extent that it had any effect, it has largely been negative in terms of procedural guarantees. Due to the weakness of technology to prevent abuse, the online version of the consultation eroded rather than enhanced the credibility of the consultation process. The case study serves as a cautionary tale to those believing that e-participation practices ‘by default’ lead to superior normative and/or policy outcomes.
|
|
