1. |
- Abbasi, Rasha, et al.
(författare)
-
IceCube search for neutrinos from GRB 221009A
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of 38th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2023). - : Sissa Medialab Srl.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- GRB 221009A is the brightest Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) ever observed. The observed extremelyhigh flux of high and very-high-energy photons provide a unique opportunity to probe the predictedneutrino counterpart to the electromagnetic emission. We have used a variety of methods to searchfor neutrinos in coincidence with the GRB over several time windows during the precursor, promptand afterglow phases of the GRB. MeV scale neutrinos are studied using photo-multiplier ratescalers which are normally used to search for galactic core-collapse supernovae neutrinos. GeVneutrinos are searched starting with DeepCore triggers. These events don’t have directionallocalization, but instead can indicate an excess in the rate of events. 10 GeV - 1 TeV and >TeVneutrinos are searched using traditional neutrino point source methods which take into accountthe direction and time of events with DeepCore and the entire IceCube detector respectively. The>TeV results include both a fast-response analysis conducted by IceCube in real-time with timewindows of T0 − 1 to T0 + 2 hours and T0 ± 1 day around the time of GRB 221009A, as well asan offline analysis with 3 new time windows up to a time window of T0 − 1 to T0 + 14 days, thelongest time period we consider. The combination of observations by IceCube covers 9 ordersof magnitude in neutrino energy, from MeV to PeV, placing upper limits across the range forpredicted neutrino emission.
|
|
2. |
- Offermann, Anne, et al.
(författare)
-
TRIM24 as an independent prognostic biomarker for prostate cancer
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Urologic Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 1078-1439 .- 1873-2496. ; 37:9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Simply applicable biomarkers for prostate cancer patients predicting the clinical course are urgently needed. Recently, TRIM24 has been identified to promote androgen receptor signaling and to correlate with an aggressive prostate cancer phenotype. Based on these data, we proofed TRIM24 as a prognostic biomarker for risk stratification.Materials and Methods: We performed TRIM24 immunohistochemistry on 2 independent cohorts including a total of 806 primary tumors, 26 locally advanced/recurrent tumors, 30 lymph node metastases, 30 distant metastases, and 129 benign prostatic samples from 497 patients as well as on 246 prostate needle biopsies. Expression data were correlated with clinic-pathological data including biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) as endpoint.Results: Benign samples show no or low TRIM24 expression in 94%, while tumor tissues demonstrate significant higher levels. Strongest expression is observed in advanced and metastatic tumors. In multivariate analyses, TRIM24 up-regulation on radical prostatectomy specimens correlates with shorter bRFS independent of other prognostic parameters. 5-(10-) year bRFS rates for TRIM24 negative, low, medium and high expressing tumors are 93.1(93.1)%, 75.4(68.5)%, 54.9(47.5)% and 43.1(32.3)%, respectively. Of interest, tumors diagnosed as indolent disease, TRIM24 expression stratifies patients into specific risk groups. Increased TRIM24 expression associates with higher grade group, positive nodal status and extraprostatic tumor growth. TRIM24 assessment on prostate needle biopsies taken prior to treatment decision at time of initial diagnosis significantly correlates with recurrence after surgery.Conclusion: Using 2 large independent radical prostatectomy specimen cohorts, we found that TRIM24 expression predicts patients' risk to develop disease recurrence with high accuracy and independent from other established biomarkers. Further, this is the first study exploring TRIM24 expression on prostate needle biopsies which represents the clinically relevant tissue type on which biomarkers guide treatment decisions. Thus, we strongly suggest introducing TRIM24 evaluation in prostate needle biopsies in clinical routine as an inexpensive and simple immunohistochemical test.
|
|
3. |
- Offermann, Anne, et al.
(författare)
-
TRIM24 as Independent Prognostic Marker in Prostate Cancer
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Modern Pathology. - : Nature Publishing Group. - 0893-3952 .- 1530-0285. ; 31:Suppl. 2, s. 372-373
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Simply applicable biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa) predicting the clinical course are urgently needed. Recently, TRIM24 has been identified to promote androgen-receptor signaling and to correlate with poor outcome. Based on these data, we validated TRIM24 as a prognostic biomarker for PCa.Design: We performed TRIM24 immunohistochemistry on two independent cohorts including a total of 806 primary tumors, 26 locally advanced/recurrent tumors, 30 lymph node metastases, 30 distant metastases and 129 benign prostatic samples from 497 patients. Expression data were correlated with clinic-pathological data including biochemical recurrence free survival (bRFS) as endpoint.Results: Benign samples show no/low TRIM24 expression in 94%, while tumors demonstrate significantly higher levels. Strongest expression is observed in metastatic tumors. In multivariate analyses, TRIM24 up-regulation correlates with shorter bRFS independent of other prognostic parameters. 5-(10-) year bRFS rates for TRIM24 negative, low, medium and high expressing tumors are 93.1(93.1)%, 75.4(68.5)%, 54.9(47.5)% and 43.1(32.3)%, respectively. Of interest, tumors diagnosed as indolent disease, TRIM24 expression stratifies patients into specific risk groups. Increased TRIM24 expression associates with higher Grade Group, positive nodal status and extraprostatic tumor growth.Conclusions: Using two large independent cohorts, we found that TRIM24 expression predicts patients’ risk to develop disease recurrence with high accuracy and independently from other established prognostic markers. To our knowledge, TRIM24 is the first prognostic biomarker to be independent, accurate and reproducible on three different primary PCa cohorts. Thus, we strongly suggest introducing TRIM24 in clinical routine as a simple immunohistochemical test.
|
|
4. |
- Tehua Lu, Timothy, et al.
(författare)
-
An evaluation of the genetic-matched pair study design using genome-wide SNP data from the European population
- 2009
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Human Genetics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1018-4813 .- 1476-5438. ; 17:7, s. 967-975
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Genetic matching potentially provides a means to alleviate the effects of incomplete Mendelian randomization in population-based gene-disease association studies. We therefore evaluated the genetic-matched pair study design on the basis of genome-wide SNP data (309 790 markers; Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 500K Array) from 2457 individuals, sampled at 23 different recruitment sites across Europe. Using pair-wise identity-by-state (IBS) as a matching criterion, we tried to derive a subset of markers that would allow identification of the best overall matching (BOM) partner for a given individual, based on the IBS status for the subset alone. However, our results suggest that, by following this approach, the prediction accuracy is only notably improved by the first 20 markers selected, and increases proportionally to the marker number thereafter. Furthermore, in a considerable proportion of cases (76.0%), the BOM of a given individual, based on the complete marker set, came from a different recruitment site than the individual itself. A second marker set, specifically selected for ancestry sensitivity using singular value decomposition, performed even more poorly and was no more capable of predicting the BOM than randomly chosen subsets. This leads us to conclude that, at least in Europe, the utility of the genetic-matched pair study design depends critically on the availability of comprehensive genotype information for both cases and controls. European Journal of Human Genetics (2009) 17, 967-975; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2008.266; published online 21 January 2009
|
|