| 1. |
- Andersén, Jimmie, 1981-, et al.
(författare)
-
Municipal responsibilities in strategic housing provision planning : to accommodate, support and facilitate
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Planning practice + research. - : Routledge. - 0269-7459 .- 1360-0583. ; 38:2, s. 236-252
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Swedish municipalities are obliged to formulate housing provision policies in housing programs, as part of municipal strategic planning. This article explores how municipalities interpret this responsibility. We analyze housing provision programs by drawing from prospective responsibility and policy analysis. Our analysis shows three different prospective responsibilities in the municipality’s production of housing provision responsibility. The results show that municipalities take actions by different means, leading to ambiguities and inequalities in housing provision planning. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Berglund Snodgrass, Lina, 1980-
(författare)
-
Conceptualising Knowledge in Spatial Planning and Displacement of “the Political”
- 2017
-
Ingår i: DISP. - : Routledge. - 0251-3625 .- 2166-8604. ; 53:4, s. 33-41
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper argues that organising spatial planning policies by funding local projects constitutes a steering mode that organises knowledge in such a way that it contributes to displacing “the political” in local spatial planning practice. “The political” is conceptualised as a space of agonistic conflicts and choicemaking (Mouffe 2005a). Such an organisation of knowledge operates to consolidate the initial framing of the problem, in which the goal and the possibility to monitor the goal is in focus, rather than challenging or questioning it in the name of justness and fairness. This is illustrated through an analysis of conceptualisations of knowledge within 127 project applications within the Swedish government's Safe and Gender Equal planning policy (2008–2010), which the National Board of Housing, Building and Planning facilitated in conjunction with the County Administration Boards of Sweden.
|
|
| 4. |
- Berglund Snodgrass, Lina, 1980-, et al.
(författare)
-
Conceptualizing Testbed Planning : Urban Planning in the Intersection between Experimental and Public Sector Logic
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Urban Planning. - : Cogitatio Press. - 2183-7635. ; 5:1, s. 96-106
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Urban planning is, in many countries, increasingly becoming intertwined with local climate ambitions, investments in urban attractiveness and “smart city” innovation measures. In the intersection between these trends, urban experimentation has developed as a process where actors are granted action space to test innovations in a collaborative setting. One arena for urban experimentation is urban testbeds. Testbeds are sites of urban development, in which experimentation constitutes an integral part of planning and developing the area. This article introduces the notion of testbed planning as a way to conceptualize planning processes in delimited sites where planning is combined with processes of urban experimentation. We define testbed planning as a multi-actor, collaborative planning process in a delimited area, with the ambition to generate and disseminate learning while simultaneously developing the site. The aim of this article is to explore processes of testbed planning with regard to the role of urban planners. Using an institutional logics perspective we conceptualize planners as navigating between a public sector—and an experimental logic. The public sector logic constitutes the formal structure of “traditional” urban planning, and the experimental logic a collaborative and testing governance structure. Using examples from three Nordic municipalities, this article explores planning roles in experiments with autonomous buses in testbeds. The analysis shows that planners negotiate these logics in three different ways, combining and merging them, separating and moving between them or acting within a conflictual process where the public sector logic dominates.
|
|
| 5. |
- Berglund-Snodgrass, Lina, et al.
(författare)
-
Conceptualizing testbed planning : Urban planning in the intersection between experimental and public sector logics
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Urban Planning. - 2183-7635. ; 5:1, s. 96-106
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Urban planning is, in many countries, increasingly becoming intertwined with local climate ambitions, investments in urban attractiveness and “smart city” innovation measures. In the intersection between these trends, urban experimentation has developed as a process where actors are granted action space to test innovations in a collaborative setting. One arena for urban experimentation is urban testbeds. Testbeds are sites of urban development, in which experimentation constitutes an integral part of planning and developing the area. This article introduces the notion of testbed planning as a way to conceptualize planning processes in delimited sites where planning is combined with processes of urban experimentation. We define testbed planning as a multi-actor, collaborative planning process in a delimited area, with the ambition to generate and disseminate learning while simultaneously developing the site. The aim of this article is to explore processes of testbed planning with regard to the role of urban planners. Using an institutional logics perspective we conceptualize planners as navigating between a public sector-and an experimental logic. The public sector logic constitutes the formal structure of “traditional” urban planning, and the experimental logic a collaborative and testing governance structure. Using examples from three Nordic municipalities, this article explores planning roles in experiments with autonomous buses in testbeds. The analysis shows that planners negotiate these logics in three different ways, combining and merging them, separating and moving between them or acting within a conflictual process where the public sector logic dominates.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Berglund Snodgrass, Lina, 1980-, et al.
(författare)
-
Debatt. Planerarrollen i samtid och framtid : Kunskaper, förmågor och färdigheter
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Nordic Journal of Architectural Research. - : The nordic associationof Architectural Research (NAF/NAAR). - 1893-5281. ; 30:3, s. 135-156
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Samhällsutmaningar påverkar hur, vad, när och varför vi ska planera, vilket medför nya förväntningar och krav på planerarens förmågor och färdigheter. Från att fokus i princip enkom har varit på reglering av mark genom framtagandet av markanvändningsplaner, utgör idag exempelvis ’facilitator’ (möjliggörare), samordnare, processledare, katalysator, urban designer och rumslig agent nya möjliga planerarroller. I den här artikeln diskuterar vi framtidens planerarroll och planeringsstudenternas föreställningar om sin kommande profession. Vad menar studenterna är fundamentala kunskaper som de måste förvärva för att kunna utöva sitt yrke? Hur uppfattar de planerarrollen? Och, vad är det för planerare som vi de facto utbildar?
|
|
| 8. |
- Berglund Snodgrass, Lina, 1980-
(författare)
-
Demanding Certainty : A Critical Examination of Swedish Spatial Planning for Safety.
- 2016
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This dissertation constitutes a critical examination of Swedish spatial planning for safety. Spatial planning for safety rests on a number of assumptions about the desired order of the world. These assumptions appear as given and unproblematic, making the formulation of alternatives appear unnecessary. This dissertation provides an account of how, and on what basis a spatial planning problem such as ‘fear and insecurity’ is formulated and acted upon. It is an account of how and what conceptions of knowledge operate to legitimise ideological representations of spatial planning problems. And furthermore, what these ideological representations of spatial planning problems substantially entail, so as to allow for a political spatial planning practice that formulates and deliberates alternatives. This is carried out by analysing assumptions of public life and knowledge within Swedish spatial planning for safety. This dissertation finds that Swedish spatial planning for safety constitutes ‘certainty’ as a hegemonic criterion for participating in public life, which operates to limit the articulation of alternative discourses in spatial planning for safety. The desired for safe public life is organised based on visual certainty, where the urban fabric should be configured in such ways as to allow for stereotypical visual identifications of one another. Such a public life reflects an individualised practice, where perceptions of fear should be governed by individuals themselves, by independently assessing situations and environments in terms of risks. This individualised conduct is coupled with the fostering of active subjects, which encompasses being engaged in the local residential areas as well as in one another. Such substantial content of ‘planning for safety’ brings about tensions in terms of its ideological legitimating basis, by moving from principles of ‘rights’, where the individual constitutes the first ethical planning subject, to unitary principles of ‘collective values’, in which the ‘community’ constitutes the first ethical planning subject. These presuppositions are further enabled through the ways in which knowledge is conceptualised in spatial planning. This dissertation argues that a hegemonic instrumental emphasis on knowledge in spatial planning prevails. Having such a hegemonic emphasis on knowledge has the implication that even though spatial planning adopts different assumptions, or moves between alternative assumptions of knowledge, the knowledge becomes meaningful only in its instrumental implementation. The instrumental emphasis on knowledge should be regarded in light of the rational and goal-oriented nature of project-based planning, which constitutes a logic that constrains the emphasis on knowledge in spatial planning. This dissertation argues further that if spatial planning should be considered a political practice that debates its goals and values, a politicisation of the emphasis on knowledge in spatial planning is imperative.
|
|
| 9. |
- Berglund Snodgrass, Lina, 1980-, et al.
(författare)
-
Editorial: Making Space for Hope: Exploring its Ethical, Activist and Methodological Implications
- 2019
-
Ingår i: plaNext. - : Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP). - 2468-0648. ; 8, s. 6-9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- [From the introduction] This volume is a special issue with contributions that stem from the collaborations of the 2018 AESOP PhD workshop, held 5-8 July at Tjärö island, Sweden. The overarching aim of the workshop was to establish inclusive spaces for dialogue and collaboration between PhD students across countries and continents on issues that pertained to the AESOP’s 2018 congress theme “Making space for hope”. Furthermore the PhD students got the chance to learn from the invited mentors with long experience from the academic planning field. The theme drew from a recognition of the severe challenges facing the world at present, for example, challenges coupled with the climate crisis, growing social inequalities, rapid population growth in urban regions and de-population trends in peripheral regions.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
