| 1. |
- Boriani, Giuseppe, et al.
(författare)
-
Plateau waveform shape allows a much higher patient shock energy tolerance in AF patients.
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. - : Wiley. - 1540-8167 .- 1045-3873. ; 18:7, s. 728-34
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the possible pain reduction of the plateau waveform in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated that reduced amplitude waveforms would be less painful than a conventional (65/65% tilt) biphasic waveform. Computer modeling suggested that a moderately long (10-12 msec) plateau (flat topped) shock waveform would deliver equivalent effectiveness with the lowest possible peak amplitude. METHODS: We enrolled 27 patients at two sites with persistent AF with a total of 220 shocks delivered during internal atrial cardioversion using an interleaved crossover design. Patient response was scored in three ways: (1) a verbally reported discomfort score, (2) visual analog scale (VAS), and (3) a blinded observer reporting a contraction score. RESULTS: All scores were significantly reduced (P < 0.0001) by the plateau waveform with impressive statistics: Verbal discomfort (3.51 +/- 0.13 to 2.89 +/- 0.12), VAS (7.00 +/- 0.56 to 5.91 +/- 0.36), and contraction scores (1.94 +/- 0.12 to 1.62 +/- 0.12). The average pain threshold shift (TS) for the Verbal score was 2.34, while that for the VAS score was 2.30. (This means that the patient typically could tolerate 2.34 times as much energy with the plateau waveform for the same level of verbally reported discomfort.) The contraction TS was less at 1.57. Response scores were also corrected for the shock sequence number to control for the sensitization effect from multiple shocks. This increased the TS for the Verbal score to 3.58, but the shock number was not significant for the VAS. A pulmonary artery electrode return was associated with lower pain compared with a coronary sinus position. CONCLUSION: A plateau shaped biphasic waveform resulted in significantly increased shock energy pain tolerances. Controlling for session sensitization, patients tolerated over three times as much energy for the same verbally reported discomfort score.
|
|
| 2. |
- Sperzel, Johannes, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical performance of a ventricular automatic capture verification algorithm.
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. - : Wiley. - 0147-8389 .- 1540-8159. ; 28:9, s. 933-7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of the ventricular automatic capture feature as implemented in the Insignia I Ultra pacemaker system (Guidant) utilizing a variety of ventricular leads. Currently, the optimal programming of the pacemaker output considers both pacemaker efficiency (prolonging battery longevity) and patient safety (adequate safety margin). The ability of a pacemaker to automatically adjust the ventricular output above the pacing threshold while maintaining the appropriate safety margin has been explored since the early 1970s and is only available today in conjunction with a specific low polarization lead system. METHODS: One hundred and five patients were enrolled from 17 European centers utilizing 31 different types of ventricular leads were followed through their 3-month follow-up visit. There were no restrictions on the type of ventricular leads used. RESULTS: The average mean difference between the commanded autothreshold test (0.652 + 0.335 V) and the manual threshold test (0.651 + 0.335 V) was 0.001 + 0.49 (P < 0.0001). The average mean difference between the ambulatory autothreshold test (0.696 + 0.322 V) and the commanded autothreshold test (0.682 + 0.315 V) was 0.002 + 0.74 (P < 0.0001). Holter recordings confirmed that there were no loss of capture incidences without a backup pulse being delivered. In addition, the mean number of backup pulses delivered in a 24-hour period was less than 0.1% of the total number of paced beats. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided that the automatic capture feature while using a variety of leads accurately determines the ventricular stimulation threshold and safely delivers a backup pulse when required.
|
|
| 3. |
- Sperzel, Johannes, et al.
(författare)
-
Performance evaluation of a right atrial automatic capture verification algorithm using two different sensing configurations.
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. - : Wiley. - 1540-8159 .- 0147-8389. ; 32:5, s. 579-87
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: This acute data collection study evaluated the performance of a right atrial (RA) automatic capture verification (ACV) algorithm based on evoked response sensing from two electrode configurations during independent unipolar pacing. METHODS: RA automatic threshold tests were conducted. Evoked response signals were simultaneously recorded between the RA(Ring) electrode and an empty pacemaker housing electrode (RA(Ring)-->Can) and the electrically isolated Indifferent header electrode (RA(Ring)-->Ind). The atrial evoked response (AER) and the performance of the ACV algorithm were evaluated off-line using each sensing configuration. An accurate threshold measurement was defined as within 0.2 V of the unipolar threshold measured manually. Threshold tests were designed to fail for small AER (< 0.35 mV) or insufficient signal-to-artifact ratio (SAR < 2). Manual threshold measurements were obtained during RA unipolar and bipolar pacing and compared across device indications. RESULTS: Data were collected from 38 patients with RA bipolar leads from four manufacturers. AER signals were analyzed from 34 patients who were indicated for a pacemaker (five), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (11), or cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (six) or defibrillator (12). The minimum AER amplitude was larger (P < 0.0001) when recorded from RA(Ring)-->Can (1.6+/-0.9 mV) than from RA(Ring)-->Ind (1.3+/-0.8 mV). The algorithm successfully measured the pacing threshold in 96.8% and 91.0% of tests for RA(Ring)-->Can and RA(Ring)-->Ind, respectively. No statistical difference between the unipolar and bipolar pacing threshold was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The RA(Ring)-->Can AER sensing configuration may provide a means of implementing an independent pacing/sensing method for ACV in the RA. RA bipolar pacing therapy based on measured RA unipolar pacing thresholds may be feasible.
|
|
