| 1. |
- Bravo, Giangiacomo, et al.
(författare)
-
Hidden connections : Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Informetrics. - : Elsevier. - 1751-1577 .- 1875-5879. ; 12:1, s. 101-112
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper aims to examine the influence of authors’ reputation on editorial bias in scholarly journals. By looking at eight years of editorial decisions in four computer science journals, including 7179 observations on 2913 submissions, we reconstructed author/referee-submission networks. For each submission, we looked at reviewer scores and estimated the reputation of submission authors by means of their network degree. By training a Bayesian network, we estimated the potential effect of scientist reputation on editorial decisions. Results showed that more reputed authors were less likely to be rejected by editors when they submitted papers receiving negative reviews. Although these four journals were comparable for scope and areas, we found certain journal specificities in their editorial process. Our findings suggest ways to examine the editorial process in relatively similar journals without recurring to in-depth individual data, which are rarely available from scholarly journals.
|
|
| 2. |
- Squazzoni, Flaminio, et al.
(författare)
-
Peer review and gender bias : A study on 145 scholarly journals
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Science Advances. - : American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). - 2375-2548. ; 7:2, s. 1-12
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Scholarly journals are often blamed for a gender gap in publication rates, but it is unclear whether peer reviewand editorial processes contribute to it. This article examines gender bias in peer review with data for 145 journalsin various fields of research, including about 1.7 million authors and 740,000 referees. We reconstructed threepossible sources of bias, i.e., the editorial selection of referees, referee recommendations, and editorial decisions,and examined all their possible relationships. Results showed that manuscripts written by women as solo authorsor coauthored by women were treated even more favorably by referees and editors. Although there were somedifferences between fields of research, our findings suggest that peer review and editorial processes do notpenalize manuscripts by women. However, increasing gender diversity in editorial teams and referee pools could helpjournals inform potential authors about their attention to these factors and so stimulate participation by women.
|
|
| 3. |
- Squazzoni, Flaminio, et al.
(författare)
-
Unlock ways to share data on peer review
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Nature. - : Nature Publishing Group. - 0028-0836 .- 1476-4687. ; 578:7796, s. 512-514
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
